电子消息传递安全:三种方法的比较

[1989 Proceedings] Fifth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference Pub Date : 1989-12-04 DOI:10.1109/CSAC.1989.81021

R. Housley

{"title":"电子消息传递安全:三种方法的比较","authors":"R. Housley","doi":"10.1109/CSAC.1989.81021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three approaches to securing electronic mail are described and compared: the 1988 CCITT X.411 Recommendation, RFC 1113, and the Message Security Protocol (MSP). Each approach offers the same basic security services. The MSP approach is found to be the least invasive. Thus, the MSP approach is unable to provide additional security features such as protected reports from MTAs (mail transfer agents) and selective body part protection.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":284420,"journal":{"name":"[1989 Proceedings] Fifth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic messaging security: a comparison of three approaches\",\"authors\":\"R. Housley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSAC.1989.81021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three approaches to securing electronic mail are described and compared: the 1988 CCITT X.411 Recommendation, RFC 1113, and the Message Security Protocol (MSP). Each approach offers the same basic security services. The MSP approach is found to be the least invasive. Thus, the MSP approach is unable to provide additional security features such as protected reports from MTAs (mail transfer agents) and selective body part protection.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":284420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989 Proceedings] Fifth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989 Proceedings] Fifth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSAC.1989.81021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989 Proceedings] Fifth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSAC.1989.81021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本文描述并比较了三种保护电子邮件的方法:1988年CCITT X.411建议书、RFC 1113和消息安全协议(MSP)。每种方法都提供相同的基本安全服务。MSP方法是侵入性最小的。因此，MSP方法无法提供额外的安全特性，例如来自mta(邮件传输代理)的受保护报告和选择性身体部分保护

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Electronic messaging security: a comparison of three approaches

Three approaches to securing electronic mail are described and compared: the 1988 CCITT X.411 Recommendation, RFC 1113, and the Message Security Protocol (MSP). Each approach offers the same basic security services. The MSP approach is found to be the least invasive. Thus, the MSP approach is unable to provide additional security features such as protected reports from MTAs (mail transfer agents) and selective body part protection.<>

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

[1989 Proceedings] Fifth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference

自引率

0.00%

发文量