发展一个跨学科的,定性的方法来写作技术研究

Devon Cook
{"title":"发展一个跨学科的,定性的方法来写作技术研究","authors":"Devon Cook","doi":"10.1145/3328020.3353912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research project is built around empirical observations and interviews conducted with expert letterpress typesetters in the United States. These observations and interviews focused on participants' composition processes, placing fine-grained analysis of their observable habits and actions in the context of their explanations of these habits and actions. Observation and interview data was collected and analyzed with the goal of describing \"intra-actions\" [1] present in the relationship between human and machine. Preliminary results show evidence of a wide variety of intra-actions, including the following: habits and actions based on a desire for efficiency, a cyclical composing process, a concern for correctness, and a deference to letterpress printing's history. By taking seriously the ways in which the traditional concept of agency has been complicated by new materialist and posthuman theories, this study looks for ways to diversify and improve research methods for understanding how humans engage in the complex design activities that is writing. If the user is adding any new data, they should make sure to style it as per the instructions provided in previous sections.","PeriodicalId":262930,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a transdisciplinary, qualitative approach to writing technology research\",\"authors\":\"Devon Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3328020.3353912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research project is built around empirical observations and interviews conducted with expert letterpress typesetters in the United States. These observations and interviews focused on participants' composition processes, placing fine-grained analysis of their observable habits and actions in the context of their explanations of these habits and actions. Observation and interview data was collected and analyzed with the goal of describing \\\"intra-actions\\\" [1] present in the relationship between human and machine. Preliminary results show evidence of a wide variety of intra-actions, including the following: habits and actions based on a desire for efficiency, a cyclical composing process, a concern for correctness, and a deference to letterpress printing's history. By taking seriously the ways in which the traditional concept of agency has been complicated by new materialist and posthuman theories, this study looks for ways to diversify and improve research methods for understanding how humans engage in the complex design activities that is writing. If the user is adding any new data, they should make sure to style it as per the instructions provided in previous sections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3328020.3353912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3328020.3353912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个研究项目是建立在经验观察和访谈与专家凸版排字在美国进行。这些观察和访谈集中在参与者的构成过程上,在他们对这些习惯和行为的解释的背景下,对他们可观察到的习惯和行为进行细致的分析。收集和分析观察和访谈数据,目的是描述人与机器关系中存在的“intra-actions”[1]。初步结果显示了各种各样的内部行动的证据,包括以下内容:基于对效率的渴望的习惯和行动,循环的排版过程,对正确性的关注,以及对凸版印刷历史的尊重。通过认真对待传统的代理概念被新唯物主义和后人类理论复杂化的方式,本研究寻找多样化和改进研究方法的方法,以理解人类如何参与复杂的设计活动,即写作。如果用户要添加任何新数据,他们应该确保按照前面章节中提供的说明对其进行样式设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a transdisciplinary, qualitative approach to writing technology research
This research project is built around empirical observations and interviews conducted with expert letterpress typesetters in the United States. These observations and interviews focused on participants' composition processes, placing fine-grained analysis of their observable habits and actions in the context of their explanations of these habits and actions. Observation and interview data was collected and analyzed with the goal of describing "intra-actions" [1] present in the relationship between human and machine. Preliminary results show evidence of a wide variety of intra-actions, including the following: habits and actions based on a desire for efficiency, a cyclical composing process, a concern for correctness, and a deference to letterpress printing's history. By taking seriously the ways in which the traditional concept of agency has been complicated by new materialist and posthuman theories, this study looks for ways to diversify and improve research methods for understanding how humans engage in the complex design activities that is writing. If the user is adding any new data, they should make sure to style it as per the instructions provided in previous sections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信