COVID-19范式下学习成果评估的数字格式:调查研究

N. Morze, Rusudan Makhachashvili, L. Varchenko-Trotsenko, Liliia Hrynevych
{"title":"COVID-19范式下学习成果评估的数字格式:调查研究","authors":"N. Morze, Rusudan Makhachashvili, L. Varchenko-Trotsenko, Liliia Hrynevych","doi":"10.1145/3526242.3526252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global pandemic and emergency digitization measures have introduced systemic challenges to the university summative and formative assessment workflow. Various modes of assessment for University-level programs are a strict regimen that consists of different elements and stages (oral, hybrid, and written exams, tests of different types, project presentations, internal and external review, expert evaluation, and peering). This study aims to critically analyze the practices of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University in various forms and modes of digital assessment for stakeholders of Liberal Arts, Education, and Computer Science major programs, implemented in the years 2020–2021 through quarantine induced digital learning. The survey analysis was conducted to evaluate ICT tools and digital competencies that are implemented to compare and contrast traditional and formative assessment practices, translated into the digital hybrid format. The investigation novelty is attained through systemic empirical findings on experiences and techniques of learning outcomes assessment in the emergency digitization measures, contrastive assessment of different modes in digital learning, evaluation of ICT tools and skills, implemented through different forms of assessment in the digital learning context.","PeriodicalId":288048,"journal":{"name":"Digital Humanities Workshop","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Formats of Learning Outcomes Assessment in the COVID-19 Paradigm: Survey Study\",\"authors\":\"N. Morze, Rusudan Makhachashvili, L. Varchenko-Trotsenko, Liliia Hrynevych\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3526242.3526252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The global pandemic and emergency digitization measures have introduced systemic challenges to the university summative and formative assessment workflow. Various modes of assessment for University-level programs are a strict regimen that consists of different elements and stages (oral, hybrid, and written exams, tests of different types, project presentations, internal and external review, expert evaluation, and peering). This study aims to critically analyze the practices of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University in various forms and modes of digital assessment for stakeholders of Liberal Arts, Education, and Computer Science major programs, implemented in the years 2020–2021 through quarantine induced digital learning. The survey analysis was conducted to evaluate ICT tools and digital competencies that are implemented to compare and contrast traditional and formative assessment practices, translated into the digital hybrid format. The investigation novelty is attained through systemic empirical findings on experiences and techniques of learning outcomes assessment in the emergency digitization measures, contrastive assessment of different modes in digital learning, evaluation of ICT tools and skills, implemented through different forms of assessment in the digital learning context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Humanities Workshop\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Humanities Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3526242.3526252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Humanities Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3526242.3526252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

全球流行病和紧急数字化措施给大学总结性和形成性评估工作流程带来了系统性挑战。大学水平课程的各种评估模式是一个严格的制度,由不同的元素和阶段组成(口头、混合和笔试、不同类型的测试、项目演示、内部和外部审查、专家评估和对等观察)。本研究旨在批判性地分析鲍里斯·格林琴科基辅大学在2020-2021年期间通过隔离诱导的数字学习,为文科、教育和计算机科学专业的利益相关者提供各种形式和模式的数字评估的做法。进行调查分析是为了评估ICT工具和数字能力,这些工具和数字能力用于比较和对比转化为数字混合格式的传统和形成性评估实践。调查的新颖性是通过对应急数字化措施中学习成果评估的经验和技术的系统实证发现、对数字化学习中不同模式的对比评估、对ICT工具和技能的评估,以及在数字化学习背景下通过不同形式的评估来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Formats of Learning Outcomes Assessment in the COVID-19 Paradigm: Survey Study
The global pandemic and emergency digitization measures have introduced systemic challenges to the university summative and formative assessment workflow. Various modes of assessment for University-level programs are a strict regimen that consists of different elements and stages (oral, hybrid, and written exams, tests of different types, project presentations, internal and external review, expert evaluation, and peering). This study aims to critically analyze the practices of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University in various forms and modes of digital assessment for stakeholders of Liberal Arts, Education, and Computer Science major programs, implemented in the years 2020–2021 through quarantine induced digital learning. The survey analysis was conducted to evaluate ICT tools and digital competencies that are implemented to compare and contrast traditional and formative assessment practices, translated into the digital hybrid format. The investigation novelty is attained through systemic empirical findings on experiences and techniques of learning outcomes assessment in the emergency digitization measures, contrastive assessment of different modes in digital learning, evaluation of ICT tools and skills, implemented through different forms of assessment in the digital learning context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信