钢筋混凝土受弯深梁承载力计算的不同方法分析

The proceedings of the 13th international conference "Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques" (MBMST 2019) Pub Date : 2019-12-03 DOI:10.3846/mbmst.2019.158

Beata Levon, Remigijus Šalna, Linas Juknevičius

{"title":"钢筋混凝土受弯深梁承载力计算的不同方法分析","authors":"Beata Levon, Remigijus Šalna, Linas Juknevičius","doi":"10.3846/mbmst.2019.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the singularities of the design of deep beams without shear reinforcement according to\ndifferent design codes, namely, STR 2.05.05:2005, EC2, EC2-SMM and ACI-318. The comparative analysis of calculation\nmodels, experimental verification, accuracy of models and the ranking of models according to the Modified Demerit\nPoints Classification (MDP) method are presented. The results shown that despite the systematic error of the\nSTR 2.05.05:2005 method is closest to 1 if compared to the other methods, it is classified as dangerous one according\nto the MDP ranking.","PeriodicalId":169478,"journal":{"name":"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\" (MBMST 2019)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the different techniques for calculation of bearing capacity of flexural reinforced concrete deep beams\",\"authors\":\"Beata Levon, Remigijus Šalna, Linas Juknevičius\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/mbmst.2019.158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper deals with the singularities of the design of deep beams without shear reinforcement according to\\ndifferent design codes, namely, STR 2.05.05:2005, EC2, EC2-SMM and ACI-318. The comparative analysis of calculation\\nmodels, experimental verification, accuracy of models and the ranking of models according to the Modified Demerit\\nPoints Classification (MDP) method are presented. The results shown that despite the systematic error of the\\nSTR 2.05.05:2005 method is closest to 1 if compared to the other methods, it is classified as dangerous one according\\nto the MDP ranking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \\\"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\\\" (MBMST 2019)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \\\"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\\\" (MBMST 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/mbmst.2019.158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\" (MBMST 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/mbmst.2019.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

根据不同的设计规范，即STR 2.05.05:2005、EC2、EC2- smm和ACI-318，分析了无剪力配筋深梁设计的奇异性。给出了基于改进分数分类(MDP)方法的计算模型对比分析、实验验证、模型精度和模型排序。结果表明，与其他方法相比，str 2.05.05:2005方法的系统误差最接近于1，但根据MDP排名，该方法属于危险方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Analysis of the different techniques for calculation of bearing capacity of flexural reinforced concrete deep beams

The paper deals with the singularities of the design of deep beams without shear reinforcement according to different design codes, namely, STR 2.05.05:2005, EC2, EC2-SMM and ACI-318. The comparative analysis of calculation models, experimental verification, accuracy of models and the ranking of models according to the Modified Demerit Points Classification (MDP) method are presented. The results shown that despite the systematic error of the STR 2.05.05:2005 method is closest to 1 if compared to the other methods, it is classified as dangerous one according to the MDP ranking.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The proceedings of the 13th international conference "Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques" (MBMST 2019)

自引率

0.00%

发文量