理论-实践关系和共同活动作为解决教育问题的焦点:教育知识的意义不支持双重模式

J. M. Touriñán López
{"title":"理论-实践关系和共同活动作为解决教育问题的焦点:教育知识的意义不支持双重模式","authors":"J. M. Touriñán López","doi":"10.35869/reined.v18i3.3265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work insists on the importance of the study of theory-practice relationship to obtain specialized and specific knowledge of education: pedagogical knowledge. \nEducation is a real field that people may know in different ways, forms, and types. Several types of knowledge and rationality are useful for making knowledge of education: philosophical theories, practical theories, applied research, substantive theories have let them build it. To a higher extent, knowledge of education has already made particular and specific concepts. \nThis study establishes differences between knowledge of education and knowledge of disciplines which are used in educative process. Besides this, it emphasizes and upholds the Educational Knowledge Growth Model. \nThe second half of this work continues to explain the different possibilities that each current of knowledge of education has, for solving the problems which arise in the intervention, regarding to theory-practice relationship. \nAll this has been made by focusing the discussion about the theory- practice connection in three different pedagogical currents (marginal, subaltern, and autonomous). \nSignification as a principle of methodology is a problem derived from how the theory-practice relationship is understood in each current of knowledge of education to justify valid knowledge. \nBy executing the external common activity, we improve and train the internal activities-capacities: without the activity it is impossible to educate and through the activity it becomes possible for the educatee to be an actor-agent and an increasingly better author-agent of his own projects and acts. \nWe shall see how the pedagogical function generates intervention by means of internal and external common activities. And we can conclude that common activity and theory-practice relationship are focuses to solve education problems from pedagogical intervention, which always implies knowledge and action.","PeriodicalId":416894,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Investigación en Educación","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relación teoría-práctica y actividad común como focos para resolver problemas de educación: la significación del conocimiento de la educación no ampara el modelo dual (Versión en inglés)\",\"authors\":\"J. M. Touriñán López\",\"doi\":\"10.35869/reined.v18i3.3265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work insists on the importance of the study of theory-practice relationship to obtain specialized and specific knowledge of education: pedagogical knowledge. \\nEducation is a real field that people may know in different ways, forms, and types. Several types of knowledge and rationality are useful for making knowledge of education: philosophical theories, practical theories, applied research, substantive theories have let them build it. To a higher extent, knowledge of education has already made particular and specific concepts. \\nThis study establishes differences between knowledge of education and knowledge of disciplines which are used in educative process. Besides this, it emphasizes and upholds the Educational Knowledge Growth Model. \\nThe second half of this work continues to explain the different possibilities that each current of knowledge of education has, for solving the problems which arise in the intervention, regarding to theory-practice relationship. \\nAll this has been made by focusing the discussion about the theory- practice connection in three different pedagogical currents (marginal, subaltern, and autonomous). \\nSignification as a principle of methodology is a problem derived from how the theory-practice relationship is understood in each current of knowledge of education to justify valid knowledge. \\nBy executing the external common activity, we improve and train the internal activities-capacities: without the activity it is impossible to educate and through the activity it becomes possible for the educatee to be an actor-agent and an increasingly better author-agent of his own projects and acts. \\nWe shall see how the pedagogical function generates intervention by means of internal and external common activities. And we can conclude that common activity and theory-practice relationship are focuses to solve education problems from pedagogical intervention, which always implies knowledge and action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Investigación en Educación\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Investigación en Educación\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35869/reined.v18i3.3265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Investigación en Educación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35869/reined.v18i3.3265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文强调了研究理论与实践的关系对于获得教育学的专业化、专门化知识——教育学知识的重要性。教育是一个真实的领域,人们可能以不同的方式、形式和类型了解它。哲学理论、实践理论、应用研究、实体性理论等多种知识和理性都有助于教育知识的建构。在更高的程度上,教育知识已经形成了特定的、具体的概念。本研究确立了教育知识与学科知识在教育过程中的区别。强调并坚持教育知识成长模式。这项工作的后半部分继续解释不同的可能性,教育知识的每一个潮流,为解决在干预中出现的问题,关于理论与实践的关系。所有这些都是通过在三种不同的教学潮流(边缘、次要和自主)中集中讨论理论与实践的联系来实现的。意义作为一种方法论原则,是如何在每一种教育知识潮流中理解理论与实践的关系以证明有效知识的问题。通过执行外部的共同活动,我们改进和训练内部的活动-能力:没有活动就不可能进行教育,而通过活动,受教育者有可能成为他自己的计划和行为的行动者-代理人和越来越好的作者-代理人。我们将看到教学功能如何通过内部和外部的共同活动产生干预。我们可以得出结论,共同的活动和理论与实践的关系是教学干预解决教育问题的焦点,而教学干预总是隐含着知识和行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relación teoría-práctica y actividad común como focos para resolver problemas de educación: la significación del conocimiento de la educación no ampara el modelo dual (Versión en inglés)
This work insists on the importance of the study of theory-practice relationship to obtain specialized and specific knowledge of education: pedagogical knowledge. Education is a real field that people may know in different ways, forms, and types. Several types of knowledge and rationality are useful for making knowledge of education: philosophical theories, practical theories, applied research, substantive theories have let them build it. To a higher extent, knowledge of education has already made particular and specific concepts. This study establishes differences between knowledge of education and knowledge of disciplines which are used in educative process. Besides this, it emphasizes and upholds the Educational Knowledge Growth Model. The second half of this work continues to explain the different possibilities that each current of knowledge of education has, for solving the problems which arise in the intervention, regarding to theory-practice relationship. All this has been made by focusing the discussion about the theory- practice connection in three different pedagogical currents (marginal, subaltern, and autonomous). Signification as a principle of methodology is a problem derived from how the theory-practice relationship is understood in each current of knowledge of education to justify valid knowledge. By executing the external common activity, we improve and train the internal activities-capacities: without the activity it is impossible to educate and through the activity it becomes possible for the educatee to be an actor-agent and an increasingly better author-agent of his own projects and acts. We shall see how the pedagogical function generates intervention by means of internal and external common activities. And we can conclude that common activity and theory-practice relationship are focuses to solve education problems from pedagogical intervention, which always implies knowledge and action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信