2013年小学课程整合程度如何?

I. Dewantara, A. Y. Paramartha
{"title":"2013年小学课程整合程度如何?","authors":"I. Dewantara, A. Y. Paramartha","doi":"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210407.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2013 curriculum was developed on the basis of future thinking to prepare students for the challenges of the 21st century. At the primary school level, learning is carried out using an integrated thematic approach. This study aimed to answer how integrated the 2013 curriculum is. Therefore, this study described the integration of lesson content in (1) subject matter, (2) learning activity design, (3) learning assessment design, and (4) media design and learning resources. This research was a content analysis research using a quantitative descriptive approach. The data were collected from teacher and student books. The data collection method used was documentation. The data analysis technique was carried out according to the theory of Miles and Huberman (1992). The results showed that (1) there was an integrated learning content in the teaching material with a percentage of 92.42% which was categorized as very good and tended to be integrated in a multidisciplinary manner, (2) there was an integration of learning content in the design of the steps for learning activities with a percentage of 89.06% categorized as good and tended to be integrated intradisisciplinary, (3) there was an integrated learning content in the assessment design with a percentage of 91.84% in the very good category and tended to be integrated intradisisciplinary, and (4) there was an integration of lesson content in the design of media and learning resources with a percentage of 95.50% categorized as very good and tended to be integrated intradisisciplinary.","PeriodicalId":426687,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Integrated is the 2013 Primary School Curriculum?\",\"authors\":\"I. Dewantara, A. Y. Paramartha\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210407.255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2013 curriculum was developed on the basis of future thinking to prepare students for the challenges of the 21st century. At the primary school level, learning is carried out using an integrated thematic approach. This study aimed to answer how integrated the 2013 curriculum is. Therefore, this study described the integration of lesson content in (1) subject matter, (2) learning activity design, (3) learning assessment design, and (4) media design and learning resources. This research was a content analysis research using a quantitative descriptive approach. The data were collected from teacher and student books. The data collection method used was documentation. The data analysis technique was carried out according to the theory of Miles and Huberman (1992). The results showed that (1) there was an integrated learning content in the teaching material with a percentage of 92.42% which was categorized as very good and tended to be integrated in a multidisciplinary manner, (2) there was an integration of learning content in the design of the steps for learning activities with a percentage of 89.06% categorized as good and tended to be integrated intradisisciplinary, (3) there was an integrated learning content in the assessment design with a percentage of 91.84% in the very good category and tended to be integrated intradisisciplinary, and (4) there was an integration of lesson content in the design of media and learning resources with a percentage of 95.50% categorized as very good and tended to be integrated intradisisciplinary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210407.255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210407.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2013年的课程是在未来思维的基础上开发的,旨在让学生为21世纪的挑战做好准备。在小学阶段,学习是采用综合主题方法进行的。本研究旨在回答2013年课程的整合程度。因此,本研究从(1)主题、(2)学习活动设计、(3)学习评估设计、(4)媒体设计与学习资源四个方面描述了课程内容的整合。本研究采用定量描述方法进行内容分析研究。这些数据是从教师和学生的书中收集的。使用的数据收集方法是记录。数据分析技术是根据Miles和Huberman(1992)的理论进行的。结果表明:(1)教材中有整合性的学习内容,占92.42%,非常好,倾向于多学科整合;(2)学习活动步骤设计中有整合性的学习内容,占89.06%,很好,倾向于学科内部整合;(3)评价设计中学习内容具有整合性,非常好类别占91.84%,倾向于学科内整合;(4)媒介和学习资源设计中课程内容具有整合性,非常好类别占95.50%,倾向于学科内整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Integrated is the 2013 Primary School Curriculum?
The 2013 curriculum was developed on the basis of future thinking to prepare students for the challenges of the 21st century. At the primary school level, learning is carried out using an integrated thematic approach. This study aimed to answer how integrated the 2013 curriculum is. Therefore, this study described the integration of lesson content in (1) subject matter, (2) learning activity design, (3) learning assessment design, and (4) media design and learning resources. This research was a content analysis research using a quantitative descriptive approach. The data were collected from teacher and student books. The data collection method used was documentation. The data analysis technique was carried out according to the theory of Miles and Huberman (1992). The results showed that (1) there was an integrated learning content in the teaching material with a percentage of 92.42% which was categorized as very good and tended to be integrated in a multidisciplinary manner, (2) there was an integration of learning content in the design of the steps for learning activities with a percentage of 89.06% categorized as good and tended to be integrated intradisisciplinary, (3) there was an integrated learning content in the assessment design with a percentage of 91.84% in the very good category and tended to be integrated intradisisciplinary, and (4) there was an integration of lesson content in the design of media and learning resources with a percentage of 95.50% categorized as very good and tended to be integrated intradisisciplinary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信