A. V. Semenova
{"title":"The image of the gloomy warrior in M. M. Kheraskov's poem “Vladimir” and in A. S. Pushkin's fairy tale “Ruslan and Lyudmila”","authors":"A. V. Semenova","doi":"10.20323/2658-7866-2021-2-8-64-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article uses a comparative text analysis of the poem “Vladimir” and the fairy tale “Ruslan and Lyudmila” to reveal a number of parallels associated with the image of the warrior Rogdai. Previously, researchers have not considered this aspect of the works in detail. The character has a conventionally historical prototype – the epic hero Rogdai is mentioned in the “Core of Russian History” by A. I. Mankiev, and his laconic description in the source sets the type of character in Kheraskov’s and Pushkin’s poems. In both works Rogdai occupies a prominent position at the court of Prince Vladimir of Kiev, and is distinguished by his strength and violent temper. Kheraskov's poem emphasizes the immorality of the character, which is due to the didactic message of “Vladimir” and the need to discredit the warrior who is an opponent of Christianity, while Pushkin omits the ethical points. As the plot develops, the relatively neutral character becomes the antagonist of the main hero – Kheraskov's Vladimir and Pushkin's Ruslan – and at a certain point fights with them, which results in the warrior's dishonorable death. The comparison of “Vladimir” and “Ruslan and Lyudmila” shows that, in addition to the name, Rogdai has similar characteristics in the works of Kheraskov and Pushkin; the image is created according to the model of the epic hero, overshadowed by negative traits. The texts show common motifs - the anger, resentment and vindictiveness of the hero, the corrupting influence of the evil spirit and its helpers, Rogdai's wandering through the desert places, his death at the hands of the enemy. The similarity between Kheraskov's and Pushkin's characters of the same name leads to the conclusion that the image of the gloomy warrior from the poem “Vladimir” was borrowed into Ruslan and Lyudmila.","PeriodicalId":236873,"journal":{"name":"World of Russian-speaking countries","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World of Russian-speaking countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20323/2658-7866-2021-2-8-64-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对诗歌《弗拉基米尔》和童话《鲁斯兰与柳德米拉》的文本比较分析,揭示了与战士罗代形象相关的一些相似之处。此前,研究人员并没有详细考虑这方面的工作。这个角色有一个传统的历史原型——史诗英雄罗代在a·i·曼基夫的《俄罗斯历史的核心》中被提到,他在来源中的简洁描述奠定了赫拉斯科夫和普希金诗歌中的角色类型。在这两部作品中,罗代在基辅弗拉基米尔亲王的宫廷中占据着重要地位,并以他的力量和暴躁的脾气而闻名。赫拉斯科夫的诗强调了人物的不道德,这是由于“弗拉基米尔”的说教信息和诋毁反对基督教的战士的需要,而普希金省略了伦理要点。随着剧情的发展,这个相对中立的角色成为了主角——赫拉斯科夫饰演的弗拉基米尔和普希金饰演的鲁斯兰——的对手,并在某一时刻与他们发生了冲突,结果导致了这位战士的不光彩的死亡。“弗拉基米尔”与“鲁斯兰与柳德米拉”的对比表明,除了名字之外,罗代在赫拉斯科夫和普希金的作品中具有相似的特征;这个形象是根据史诗英雄的模式创造的,被负面的特质所掩盖。这些文本展示了共同的主题——英雄的愤怒、怨恨和报复,邪灵及其帮助者的腐化影响,罗代在沙漠中游荡,死于敌人之手。赫拉斯科夫和普希金笔下的同名人物的相似之处可以得出结论,《弗拉基米尔》中阴郁的战士形象被借用到了鲁斯兰和柳德米拉身上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The image of the gloomy warrior in M. M. Kheraskov's poem “Vladimir” and in A. S. Pushkin's fairy tale “Ruslan and Lyudmila”
The article uses a comparative text analysis of the poem “Vladimir” and the fairy tale “Ruslan and Lyudmila” to reveal a number of parallels associated with the image of the warrior Rogdai. Previously, researchers have not considered this aspect of the works in detail. The character has a conventionally historical prototype – the epic hero Rogdai is mentioned in the “Core of Russian History” by A. I. Mankiev, and his laconic description in the source sets the type of character in Kheraskov’s and Pushkin’s poems. In both works Rogdai occupies a prominent position at the court of Prince Vladimir of Kiev, and is distinguished by his strength and violent temper. Kheraskov's poem emphasizes the immorality of the character, which is due to the didactic message of “Vladimir” and the need to discredit the warrior who is an opponent of Christianity, while Pushkin omits the ethical points. As the plot develops, the relatively neutral character becomes the antagonist of the main hero – Kheraskov's Vladimir and Pushkin's Ruslan – and at a certain point fights with them, which results in the warrior's dishonorable death. The comparison of “Vladimir” and “Ruslan and Lyudmila” shows that, in addition to the name, Rogdai has similar characteristics in the works of Kheraskov and Pushkin; the image is created according to the model of the epic hero, overshadowed by negative traits. The texts show common motifs - the anger, resentment and vindictiveness of the hero, the corrupting influence of the evil spirit and its helpers, Rogdai's wandering through the desert places, his death at the hands of the enemy. The similarity between Kheraskov's and Pushkin's characters of the same name leads to the conclusion that the image of the gloomy warrior from the poem “Vladimir” was borrowed into Ruslan and Lyudmila.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信