{"title":"反事实的对话者","authors":"N. Ballantyne","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If the intellectual world were different, we would very likely face powerful objections we haven’t actually encountered. Realizing that “counterfactual interlocutors” could devise objections to our strongest arguments can help us keep our confidence in check. This chapter defends the idea that counterfactual interlocutors may challenge our controversial opinions.","PeriodicalId":345622,"journal":{"name":"Knowing Our Limits","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counterfactual Interlocutors\",\"authors\":\"N. Ballantyne\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If the intellectual world were different, we would very likely face powerful objections we haven’t actually encountered. Realizing that “counterfactual interlocutors” could devise objections to our strongest arguments can help us keep our confidence in check. This chapter defends the idea that counterfactual interlocutors may challenge our controversial opinions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowing Our Limits\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowing Our Limits\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowing Our Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
If the intellectual world were different, we would very likely face powerful objections we haven’t actually encountered. Realizing that “counterfactual interlocutors” could devise objections to our strongest arguments can help us keep our confidence in check. This chapter defends the idea that counterfactual interlocutors may challenge our controversial opinions.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
