{"title":"良性前列腺增生患者经尿道前列腺切除术后尿道狭窄发展的预测因素。","authors":"B. Park, J. Park, Y. Jeong, J. K. Park, Y. Park","doi":"10.5213/JKCS.2007.11.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate possible factors affecting urethral stricture development after TURP in patients with BPH. Materials and Methods: We reviewed retrospectively medical records of patients who underwent TURP for 6 years. All operations were performed by 2 experienced doctors who have minimum 200 practices. Patients were classified into 2 groups. Group A included patients with urethral stricture required periodic urethral dilation or urethrotomy. Group B included those without urethral stricture development after TURP. We analyzed all possible factors such as resection time, prostate volume, resection volume, resectoscope size, preoperative catheterization duration due to AUR, postoperative catheterization duration, preoperative pyuria, prostate needle biopsy performed preoperatively and PSA level, age and co-morbid systemic diseases. Results: 595 patients underwent TURP between 2000 and 2005. 76 of them were excluded because of preexisting urethral stricture or secondary TURP. 110 were categorized into group A and 409 into group B. There was no statistical difference between group A and B with respect to age, preoperative catheterization duration in patients with AUR, postoperative catheterization duration, prostate volume, resection volume, preoperative PSA level, preoperative pyuria, preoperative biopsy history, resectoscope size (22F vs 24F) and anesthesia method (general vs spinal), respectively. However, there is significant difference between group A and B in comparison of resection time (58.5±21.6 min vs 48.5±23.2 min, p=0.02). Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that the shortening of resection time is the most important single factor to decrease urethral stricture formation after TURP in patients with BPH. (J. Korean Continence Society 2007;11:9-13)","PeriodicalId":231333,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Continence Society","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Factors Affecting Urethral Stricture Development after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.\",\"authors\":\"B. Park, J. Park, Y. Jeong, J. K. Park, Y. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.5213/JKCS.2007.11.1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To evaluate possible factors affecting urethral stricture development after TURP in patients with BPH. Materials and Methods: We reviewed retrospectively medical records of patients who underwent TURP for 6 years. All operations were performed by 2 experienced doctors who have minimum 200 practices. Patients were classified into 2 groups. Group A included patients with urethral stricture required periodic urethral dilation or urethrotomy. Group B included those without urethral stricture development after TURP. We analyzed all possible factors such as resection time, prostate volume, resection volume, resectoscope size, preoperative catheterization duration due to AUR, postoperative catheterization duration, preoperative pyuria, prostate needle biopsy performed preoperatively and PSA level, age and co-morbid systemic diseases. Results: 595 patients underwent TURP between 2000 and 2005. 76 of them were excluded because of preexisting urethral stricture or secondary TURP. 110 were categorized into group A and 409 into group B. There was no statistical difference between group A and B with respect to age, preoperative catheterization duration in patients with AUR, postoperative catheterization duration, prostate volume, resection volume, preoperative PSA level, preoperative pyuria, preoperative biopsy history, resectoscope size (22F vs 24F) and anesthesia method (general vs spinal), respectively. However, there is significant difference between group A and B in comparison of resection time (58.5±21.6 min vs 48.5±23.2 min, p=0.02). Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that the shortening of resection time is the most important single factor to decrease urethral stricture formation after TURP in patients with BPH. (J. Korean Continence Society 2007;11:9-13)\",\"PeriodicalId\":231333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Continence Society\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Continence Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5213/JKCS.2007.11.1.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Continence Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5213/JKCS.2007.11.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨前列腺增生患者行尿道切除术后尿道狭窄发展的可能影响因素。材料和方法:我们回顾性地回顾了6年的TURP患者的医疗记录。所有手术均由2名经验丰富的医生进行,他们至少有200次实践经验。患者分为两组。A组为尿道狭窄患者,需定期行尿道扩张或尿道切开术。B组为TURP术后未出现尿道狭窄的患者。我们分析了所有可能的因素,如切除时间、前列腺体积、切除体积、切除镜大小、AUR术前置管时间、术后置管时间、术前脓尿、术前前列腺穿刺活检和PSA水平、年龄和合并症全身性疾病。结果:2000年至2005年595例患者行TURP。其中76例因尿道狭窄或继发性TURP而被排除。A组110例,B组409例。A组与B组在年龄、AUR患者术前置管时间、术后置管时间、前列腺体积、切除体积、术前PSA水平、术前脓尿、术前活检史、切除镜大小(22F vs 24F)、麻醉方式(全身麻醉vs脊柱麻醉)方面差异均无统计学意义。A组与B组在切除时间上比较差异有统计学意义(58.5±21.6 min vs 48.5±23.2 min, p=0.02)。结论:我们的数据表明,缩短切除时间是减少前列腺增生患者TURP后尿道狭窄形成的最重要的单一因素。(韩国自制学会2007;11:9-13)
Predictive Factors Affecting Urethral Stricture Development after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Purpose: To evaluate possible factors affecting urethral stricture development after TURP in patients with BPH. Materials and Methods: We reviewed retrospectively medical records of patients who underwent TURP for 6 years. All operations were performed by 2 experienced doctors who have minimum 200 practices. Patients were classified into 2 groups. Group A included patients with urethral stricture required periodic urethral dilation or urethrotomy. Group B included those without urethral stricture development after TURP. We analyzed all possible factors such as resection time, prostate volume, resection volume, resectoscope size, preoperative catheterization duration due to AUR, postoperative catheterization duration, preoperative pyuria, prostate needle biopsy performed preoperatively and PSA level, age and co-morbid systemic diseases. Results: 595 patients underwent TURP between 2000 and 2005. 76 of them were excluded because of preexisting urethral stricture or secondary TURP. 110 were categorized into group A and 409 into group B. There was no statistical difference between group A and B with respect to age, preoperative catheterization duration in patients with AUR, postoperative catheterization duration, prostate volume, resection volume, preoperative PSA level, preoperative pyuria, preoperative biopsy history, resectoscope size (22F vs 24F) and anesthesia method (general vs spinal), respectively. However, there is significant difference between group A and B in comparison of resection time (58.5±21.6 min vs 48.5±23.2 min, p=0.02). Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that the shortening of resection time is the most important single factor to decrease urethral stricture formation after TURP in patients with BPH. (J. Korean Continence Society 2007;11:9-13)