战略绩效指标和市场导向对企业绩效的影响

M. Dahlan, Y. Yuliansyah, Maryani Maryani, A. I. A. Shikhy
{"title":"战略绩效指标和市场导向对企业绩效的影响","authors":"M. Dahlan, Y. Yuliansyah, Maryani Maryani, A. I. A. Shikhy","doi":"10.24052/jbrmr/v13is04/art-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the effect of strategic performance measures (SPM) on a firm’s performance in the service sector with and without the mediating effect of market orientation (MO).We analyse 107 data points with structural equation modellingSmartPLS. The results show that to use SPM has a positive effect on a firm’s performance, both directly and indirectly through the mediator of MO (customers).We do not involve MO (competitors), a completely different dimension.In addition, using the Sobel test We find that MO (customers) fully mediates the relationship between SPM and a firm’s performance. This research confirms that a firm does better when it consistently fulfils its customers’ needs and thus gains a sustainable competitive advantage. Previous studies of MO by management accounting researchers did not fully recognise the effect of the mediation. Corresponding author: Yuliansyah Yuliansyah Email addresses for the corresponding author: yuliansyah@feb.unila.ac.id First submission received: 23rd April 2018 Revised submission received: 25th July 2018 Accepted: 10th September 2018 Introduction The essence of business strategy is how ‘a company creates value for customers and differentiates itself from competitors in the marketplace’ (Simons, 2000, p. 6). In order to gain a sustainable competitive advantage, an organization should seek potential markets that differentiate it from its competitors. Such orientation may enable the organization to acquire a long-term competitive advantage with subsequently improved performance (Zhou, Brown, & Dev, 2009). However, market orientation (MO) has been investigated more in the marketing literature (e.g. Narver & Slater, 1990; Slater & Narver, 1995), than in management accounting (see: Cadez & Guilding, 2008; Guilding & McManus, 2002). For instance, Cadez and Guilding (2008, p. 841) note that ‘the inclusion of MO [...] was also partially motivated by a lack of recognition given to the construct by accounting researchers.’ This acknowledged gap motivates us to investigate the extent to which MO mediates the relationship between strategic performance measures (SPM) and performance. More specifically, using similar data in the Indonesian financial institutions, I rely on integrative strategic performance measurement as our SPM construct. We hypothesise that the use of SPM can enhance MO, in turn leading to improved performance. This belief is based on the fact that SPM generates a continuous flow of relevant information to achieve strategic goals, and to facilitate improvement when an organisation is in difficulties. Some scholars note that MO, too, is a process to generate information and sustainably to improve performance (Cravens, Greenley, Piercy, & Slater, 1997; Kumar, Jones, Venkatesan, & Leone, 2011; Slater & Narver, 1995) Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR), Vol. 13 Issue 4 July 2019 www.jbrmr.com A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM) 169 In addition, MO is a way to respond to the market and swiftly to reorient in conditions of rapid dynamic change (Day, 1994; Narver & Slater, 1990). Furthermore, the central concept of MO is that firms can continuously meet the ever-changing needs of buyers (Narver & Slater, 1990). Thus, when a firm can respond to market requirements and focus on buyers, it can maintain long-term relationships with its customers and perform well. (Narver & Slater, 1990; Tajeddini, 2010). Based on this argument, we draw up the research framework in Figure 1 below: Figure 1: Research Framework Thus, I propose a research question: To what extent does SPM enhance a firm’s performance through mediation by MO? We study the service sector in firms listed on the Indonesian stock exchange. We agree with Kihn (2010), Chenhall (2005), Yuliansyah, Rammal, and Rose (2016), and Yuliansyah et al. (2016) that studies of management accounting in the service sector are quite limited. This study enriches. Also, by including MO, this study fills another gap in the literature of management accounting. Although marketing is widely discussed, its study in the field of management accounting is limited (Cadez & Guilding, 2008; Guilding & McManus, 2002). In today’s very competitive market, management control systems guide, monitor, and implement MO to stimulate performance. Again, this study adds to the literature of how management control systems can shift an organization’s MO and subsequently make performance better. This paper is divided into five sections. The next, section 2, is hypothesis development, followed by Section 3, research methodology, and Section 4, Structural Equation Modelling Test – Partial Least Square. The last part, 5, sets out our conclusions, recommendations, and procedural comments including limitations. Literature review and hypothesis development Strategic Performance Measures and market orientation SPM is a critical process, crucial to the success or failure of an organization, and it must be appropriate to the firm’s strategy(Baird, 2017; Pollanen, Abdel-Maksoud, Elbanna, & Mahama, 2017; Yuliansyah, Gurd, & Mohamed, 2017; Yuliansyah & Khan, 2015). Management accountants affirm that the purpose of SPM is to control and evaluate business strategy that has been previously decided (Chenhall, 2005; Naranjo-Gil & Hartmann, 2007; Riccardo, Monica, Anna, & Franco, 2015). Porter (1985) says that to achieve sustainable competitive superiority, an organization must choose between business strategies of low cost or of differentiation. Which is chosen depends on how much the organization can amend its MO. If the organization desires MO, it requires information that can formulate, evaluate, control, and detect if there is a problem. The information comes from a strategically oriented performance measurement system. Although work on strategic measures and MO is rare in the management accounting field, Guilding and McManus (2002) show that strategic management accounting has a positive relationship with MO. Therefore, we hypothesise the following: H1: There is a positive relation between strategic performance measures and market orientation. The relationship between market orientation and firm performance Market orientation is a source of sustainable competitive advantage in static markets (Huhtala, Vaniala, & Tikkanen, 2016, p. 73).The implementation of MO is related to the improvement of a firm’s performance(Jaworski & Kohli, 1993), becauseMO is a characteristic of organizations that consistently SPM Market orientation","PeriodicalId":236465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of strategic performance measures and market orientation on a firm’s performance\",\"authors\":\"M. Dahlan, Y. Yuliansyah, Maryani Maryani, A. I. A. Shikhy\",\"doi\":\"10.24052/jbrmr/v13is04/art-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the effect of strategic performance measures (SPM) on a firm’s performance in the service sector with and without the mediating effect of market orientation (MO).We analyse 107 data points with structural equation modellingSmartPLS. The results show that to use SPM has a positive effect on a firm’s performance, both directly and indirectly through the mediator of MO (customers).We do not involve MO (competitors), a completely different dimension.In addition, using the Sobel test We find that MO (customers) fully mediates the relationship between SPM and a firm’s performance. This research confirms that a firm does better when it consistently fulfils its customers’ needs and thus gains a sustainable competitive advantage. Previous studies of MO by management accounting researchers did not fully recognise the effect of the mediation. Corresponding author: Yuliansyah Yuliansyah Email addresses for the corresponding author: yuliansyah@feb.unila.ac.id First submission received: 23rd April 2018 Revised submission received: 25th July 2018 Accepted: 10th September 2018 Introduction The essence of business strategy is how ‘a company creates value for customers and differentiates itself from competitors in the marketplace’ (Simons, 2000, p. 6). In order to gain a sustainable competitive advantage, an organization should seek potential markets that differentiate it from its competitors. Such orientation may enable the organization to acquire a long-term competitive advantage with subsequently improved performance (Zhou, Brown, & Dev, 2009). However, market orientation (MO) has been investigated more in the marketing literature (e.g. Narver & Slater, 1990; Slater & Narver, 1995), than in management accounting (see: Cadez & Guilding, 2008; Guilding & McManus, 2002). For instance, Cadez and Guilding (2008, p. 841) note that ‘the inclusion of MO [...] was also partially motivated by a lack of recognition given to the construct by accounting researchers.’ This acknowledged gap motivates us to investigate the extent to which MO mediates the relationship between strategic performance measures (SPM) and performance. More specifically, using similar data in the Indonesian financial institutions, I rely on integrative strategic performance measurement as our SPM construct. We hypothesise that the use of SPM can enhance MO, in turn leading to improved performance. This belief is based on the fact that SPM generates a continuous flow of relevant information to achieve strategic goals, and to facilitate improvement when an organisation is in difficulties. Some scholars note that MO, too, is a process to generate information and sustainably to improve performance (Cravens, Greenley, Piercy, & Slater, 1997; Kumar, Jones, Venkatesan, & Leone, 2011; Slater & Narver, 1995) Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR), Vol. 13 Issue 4 July 2019 www.jbrmr.com A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM) 169 In addition, MO is a way to respond to the market and swiftly to reorient in conditions of rapid dynamic change (Day, 1994; Narver & Slater, 1990). Furthermore, the central concept of MO is that firms can continuously meet the ever-changing needs of buyers (Narver & Slater, 1990). Thus, when a firm can respond to market requirements and focus on buyers, it can maintain long-term relationships with its customers and perform well. (Narver & Slater, 1990; Tajeddini, 2010). Based on this argument, we draw up the research framework in Figure 1 below: Figure 1: Research Framework Thus, I propose a research question: To what extent does SPM enhance a firm’s performance through mediation by MO? We study the service sector in firms listed on the Indonesian stock exchange. We agree with Kihn (2010), Chenhall (2005), Yuliansyah, Rammal, and Rose (2016), and Yuliansyah et al. (2016) that studies of management accounting in the service sector are quite limited. This study enriches. Also, by including MO, this study fills another gap in the literature of management accounting. Although marketing is widely discussed, its study in the field of management accounting is limited (Cadez & Guilding, 2008; Guilding & McManus, 2002). In today’s very competitive market, management control systems guide, monitor, and implement MO to stimulate performance. Again, this study adds to the literature of how management control systems can shift an organization’s MO and subsequently make performance better. This paper is divided into five sections. The next, section 2, is hypothesis development, followed by Section 3, research methodology, and Section 4, Structural Equation Modelling Test – Partial Least Square. The last part, 5, sets out our conclusions, recommendations, and procedural comments including limitations. Literature review and hypothesis development Strategic Performance Measures and market orientation SPM is a critical process, crucial to the success or failure of an organization, and it must be appropriate to the firm’s strategy(Baird, 2017; Pollanen, Abdel-Maksoud, Elbanna, & Mahama, 2017; Yuliansyah, Gurd, & Mohamed, 2017; Yuliansyah & Khan, 2015). Management accountants affirm that the purpose of SPM is to control and evaluate business strategy that has been previously decided (Chenhall, 2005; Naranjo-Gil & Hartmann, 2007; Riccardo, Monica, Anna, & Franco, 2015). Porter (1985) says that to achieve sustainable competitive superiority, an organization must choose between business strategies of low cost or of differentiation. Which is chosen depends on how much the organization can amend its MO. If the organization desires MO, it requires information that can formulate, evaluate, control, and detect if there is a problem. The information comes from a strategically oriented performance measurement system. Although work on strategic measures and MO is rare in the management accounting field, Guilding and McManus (2002) show that strategic management accounting has a positive relationship with MO. Therefore, we hypothesise the following: H1: There is a positive relation between strategic performance measures and market orientation. The relationship between market orientation and firm performance Market orientation is a source of sustainable competitive advantage in static markets (Huhtala, Vaniala, & Tikkanen, 2016, p. 73).The implementation of MO is related to the improvement of a firm’s performance(Jaworski & Kohli, 1993), becauseMO is a characteristic of organizations that consistently SPM Market orientation\",\"PeriodicalId\":236465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24052/jbrmr/v13is04/art-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24052/jbrmr/v13is04/art-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在市场导向(MO)的中介作用下和在没有市场导向(MO)的中介作用下,战略绩效衡量(SPM)对服务行业企业绩效的影响。我们用结构方程建模smartpls分析了107个数据点。研究结果表明,企业使用SPM会通过MO(顾客)这一中介直接和间接地对企业绩效产生积极影响。我们不涉及MO(竞争者),这是一个完全不同的维度。此外,通过Sobel检验,我们发现MO(顾客)完全中介了SPM与企业绩效之间的关系。这项研究证实,当一个公司持续满足客户的需求,从而获得可持续的竞争优势时,它做得更好。以往管理会计研究者对MO的研究并没有充分认识到中介的作用。通讯作者:Yuliansyah Yuliansyah通讯作者邮箱:yuliansyah@feb.unila.ac.id首次投稿收到:2018年4月23日修订收到:2018年7月25日接受:商业战略的本质是“公司如何为客户创造价值,并在市场上与竞争对手区分开来”(Simons, 2000, p. 6)。为了获得可持续的竞争优势,组织应该寻求与竞争对手区分开来的潜在市场。这样的导向可以使组织获得长期的竞争优势,从而提高绩效(Zhou, Brown, & Dev, 2009)。然而,市场导向(MO)在市场营销文献中得到了更多的研究(如Narver & Slater, 1990;Slater & Narver, 1995),而不是管理会计(见:Cadez & Guilding, 2008;Guilding & McManus, 2002)。例如,Cadez和Guilding (2008, p. 841)指出,“MO的加入……也有部分原因是由于会计研究者对这种结构缺乏认识。“这一公认的差距促使我们研究MO在多大程度上调解战略绩效指标(SPM)与绩效之间的关系。”更具体地说,使用印度尼西亚金融机构的类似数据,我依靠综合战略绩效衡量作为我们的SPM结构。我们假设使用SPM可以增强MO,从而导致性能的提高。这种信念是基于这样一个事实,即SPM可以产生持续的相关信息流,以实现战略目标,并在组织陷入困境时促进改进。一些学者指出,MO也是一个产生信息并持续提高绩效的过程(Cravens, Greenley, Piercy, & Slater, 1997;Kumar, Jones, Venkatesan, & Leone, 2011;Slater & Narver, 1995)《商业与零售管理研究杂志》(JBRMR),第13卷第4期2019年7月www.jbrmr.com《商业与零售管理学会杂志》(ABRM) 169此外,MO是一种在快速动态变化的条件下对市场做出反应并迅速重新定位的方式(Day, 1994;Narver & Slater, 1990)。此外,MO的核心概念是企业能够持续满足不断变化的买家需求(Narver & Slater, 1990)。因此,当一个企业能够对市场需求做出反应并关注买家时,它就能保持与客户的长期关系并表现良好。(Narver & Slater, 1990;Tajeddini, 2010)。基于这一论点,我们拟定了如下图1所示的研究框架:图1:研究框架因此,我提出了一个研究问题:SPM通过MO的中介在多大程度上提升了企业绩效?我们研究了在印尼证券交易所上市的公司的服务部门。Kihn (2010), Chenhall (2005), Yuliansyah, Rammal, and Rose (2016), Yuliansyah et al.(2016)认为服务业管理会计的研究相当有限,我们同意这一观点。这项研究丰富了。同时,通过引入MO,本研究填补了管理会计文献的另一个空白。虽然市场营销被广泛讨论,但其在管理会计领域的研究有限(Cadez & Guilding, 2008;Guilding & McManus, 2002)。在当今竞争激烈的市场中,管理控制系统指导、监控和实施MO来激励绩效。再一次,本研究增加了管理控制系统如何改变组织的MO并随后使绩效更好的文献。本文共分为五个部分。接下来,第2节是假设发展,然后是第3节,研究方法,第4节,结构方程建模检验-偏最小二乘法。最后一部分,5,列出了我们的结论、建议和程序评论,包括局限性。 战略绩效衡量和市场导向SPM是一个关键的过程,对一个组织的成败至关重要,它必须适合公司的战略(Baird, 2017;Pollanen, Abdel-Maksoud, Elbanna, & Mahama, 2017;Yuliansyah, Gurd和Mohamed, 2017;Yuliansyah & Khan, 2015)。管理会计师确认SPM的目的是控制和评估已经决定的业务战略(Chenhall, 2005;Naranjo-Gil & Hartmann, 2007;Riccardo, Monica, Anna, & Franco, 2015)。Porter(1985)认为,要获得持续的竞争优势,企业必须在低成本经营战略和差异化经营战略之间做出选择。选择哪一种取决于组织能在多大程度上修改其MO。如果组织需要MO,则需要能够制定、评估、控制和发现问题的信息。这些信息来自一个战略导向的绩效评估系统。虽然在管理会计领域关于战略措施和经营目标的研究很少,但Guilding和McManus(2002)表明战略管理会计与经营目标之间存在正相关关系。因此,我们假设:H1:战略绩效措施与市场导向之间存在正相关关系。市场导向是静态市场中可持续竞争优势的来源(Huhtala, Vaniala, & Tikkanen, 2016, p. 73)。MO的实施与企业绩效的提高有关(Jaworski & Kohli, 1993),因为MO是一贯以SPM市场为导向的组织的特征
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of strategic performance measures and market orientation on a firm’s performance
This study investigates the effect of strategic performance measures (SPM) on a firm’s performance in the service sector with and without the mediating effect of market orientation (MO).We analyse 107 data points with structural equation modellingSmartPLS. The results show that to use SPM has a positive effect on a firm’s performance, both directly and indirectly through the mediator of MO (customers).We do not involve MO (competitors), a completely different dimension.In addition, using the Sobel test We find that MO (customers) fully mediates the relationship between SPM and a firm’s performance. This research confirms that a firm does better when it consistently fulfils its customers’ needs and thus gains a sustainable competitive advantage. Previous studies of MO by management accounting researchers did not fully recognise the effect of the mediation. Corresponding author: Yuliansyah Yuliansyah Email addresses for the corresponding author: yuliansyah@feb.unila.ac.id First submission received: 23rd April 2018 Revised submission received: 25th July 2018 Accepted: 10th September 2018 Introduction The essence of business strategy is how ‘a company creates value for customers and differentiates itself from competitors in the marketplace’ (Simons, 2000, p. 6). In order to gain a sustainable competitive advantage, an organization should seek potential markets that differentiate it from its competitors. Such orientation may enable the organization to acquire a long-term competitive advantage with subsequently improved performance (Zhou, Brown, & Dev, 2009). However, market orientation (MO) has been investigated more in the marketing literature (e.g. Narver & Slater, 1990; Slater & Narver, 1995), than in management accounting (see: Cadez & Guilding, 2008; Guilding & McManus, 2002). For instance, Cadez and Guilding (2008, p. 841) note that ‘the inclusion of MO [...] was also partially motivated by a lack of recognition given to the construct by accounting researchers.’ This acknowledged gap motivates us to investigate the extent to which MO mediates the relationship between strategic performance measures (SPM) and performance. More specifically, using similar data in the Indonesian financial institutions, I rely on integrative strategic performance measurement as our SPM construct. We hypothesise that the use of SPM can enhance MO, in turn leading to improved performance. This belief is based on the fact that SPM generates a continuous flow of relevant information to achieve strategic goals, and to facilitate improvement when an organisation is in difficulties. Some scholars note that MO, too, is a process to generate information and sustainably to improve performance (Cravens, Greenley, Piercy, & Slater, 1997; Kumar, Jones, Venkatesan, & Leone, 2011; Slater & Narver, 1995) Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR), Vol. 13 Issue 4 July 2019 www.jbrmr.com A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM) 169 In addition, MO is a way to respond to the market and swiftly to reorient in conditions of rapid dynamic change (Day, 1994; Narver & Slater, 1990). Furthermore, the central concept of MO is that firms can continuously meet the ever-changing needs of buyers (Narver & Slater, 1990). Thus, when a firm can respond to market requirements and focus on buyers, it can maintain long-term relationships with its customers and perform well. (Narver & Slater, 1990; Tajeddini, 2010). Based on this argument, we draw up the research framework in Figure 1 below: Figure 1: Research Framework Thus, I propose a research question: To what extent does SPM enhance a firm’s performance through mediation by MO? We study the service sector in firms listed on the Indonesian stock exchange. We agree with Kihn (2010), Chenhall (2005), Yuliansyah, Rammal, and Rose (2016), and Yuliansyah et al. (2016) that studies of management accounting in the service sector are quite limited. This study enriches. Also, by including MO, this study fills another gap in the literature of management accounting. Although marketing is widely discussed, its study in the field of management accounting is limited (Cadez & Guilding, 2008; Guilding & McManus, 2002). In today’s very competitive market, management control systems guide, monitor, and implement MO to stimulate performance. Again, this study adds to the literature of how management control systems can shift an organization’s MO and subsequently make performance better. This paper is divided into five sections. The next, section 2, is hypothesis development, followed by Section 3, research methodology, and Section 4, Structural Equation Modelling Test – Partial Least Square. The last part, 5, sets out our conclusions, recommendations, and procedural comments including limitations. Literature review and hypothesis development Strategic Performance Measures and market orientation SPM is a critical process, crucial to the success or failure of an organization, and it must be appropriate to the firm’s strategy(Baird, 2017; Pollanen, Abdel-Maksoud, Elbanna, & Mahama, 2017; Yuliansyah, Gurd, & Mohamed, 2017; Yuliansyah & Khan, 2015). Management accountants affirm that the purpose of SPM is to control and evaluate business strategy that has been previously decided (Chenhall, 2005; Naranjo-Gil & Hartmann, 2007; Riccardo, Monica, Anna, & Franco, 2015). Porter (1985) says that to achieve sustainable competitive superiority, an organization must choose between business strategies of low cost or of differentiation. Which is chosen depends on how much the organization can amend its MO. If the organization desires MO, it requires information that can formulate, evaluate, control, and detect if there is a problem. The information comes from a strategically oriented performance measurement system. Although work on strategic measures and MO is rare in the management accounting field, Guilding and McManus (2002) show that strategic management accounting has a positive relationship with MO. Therefore, we hypothesise the following: H1: There is a positive relation between strategic performance measures and market orientation. The relationship between market orientation and firm performance Market orientation is a source of sustainable competitive advantage in static markets (Huhtala, Vaniala, & Tikkanen, 2016, p. 73).The implementation of MO is related to the improvement of a firm’s performance(Jaworski & Kohli, 1993), becauseMO is a characteristic of organizations that consistently SPM Market orientation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信