{"title":"国立伊斯兰大学对伊斯兰主义的制度反应:从三个校区的经验教训","authors":"Fawaizul Umam, Khoirul Faizin","doi":"10.15642/TEOSOFI.2020.10.2.253-283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempts to reveal the trend of Islamism and the institutional responses to it in Indonesian higher education, especially in the Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri or State Islamic Universities (PTKIN). Three PTKINs, which were UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, and IAIN Jember, were purposively selected as the research locus. Meanwhile, a case study approach was used to describe Islamism’s trend at these state universities from the 2000s to 2017. It was discovered that the Islamists attempted to infiltrate the campus life through two strategies, which were called persuasive and normative-reeducative. Subsequently, this phenomenon urged the three PTKINs to decide their institutional responses, which have been mainly aimed at deradicalizing campus life and delegitimizing Islamism’s ideology among academics. The institutional responses seem to be pivotal for all PTKINs, especially the three selected schools, because the campus is home to the scientific realm and not a political one. Also, Islamism is a factual threat, both to the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) and the ideals of the religion as a blessing for the universe.","PeriodicalId":174700,"journal":{"name":"Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Institutional Responses of State Islamic Universities to Islamism: Lessons Learned from Three Campuses\",\"authors\":\"Fawaizul Umam, Khoirul Faizin\",\"doi\":\"10.15642/TEOSOFI.2020.10.2.253-283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study attempts to reveal the trend of Islamism and the institutional responses to it in Indonesian higher education, especially in the Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri or State Islamic Universities (PTKIN). Three PTKINs, which were UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, and IAIN Jember, were purposively selected as the research locus. Meanwhile, a case study approach was used to describe Islamism’s trend at these state universities from the 2000s to 2017. It was discovered that the Islamists attempted to infiltrate the campus life through two strategies, which were called persuasive and normative-reeducative. Subsequently, this phenomenon urged the three PTKINs to decide their institutional responses, which have been mainly aimed at deradicalizing campus life and delegitimizing Islamism’s ideology among academics. The institutional responses seem to be pivotal for all PTKINs, especially the three selected schools, because the campus is home to the scientific realm and not a political one. Also, Islamism is a factual threat, both to the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) and the ideals of the religion as a blessing for the universe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15642/TEOSOFI.2020.10.2.253-283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/TEOSOFI.2020.10.2.253-283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究试图揭示伊斯兰主义的趋势以及印尼高等教育机构对此的反应,特别是在Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri或国立伊斯兰大学(PTKIN)。三个PTKINs分别是Sunan Ampel Surabaya, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang和IAIN Jember,目的是选择作为研究地点。与此同时,一种案例研究方法被用来描述从2000年到2017年伊斯兰主义在这些州立大学的趋势。研究发现,伊斯兰主义者试图通过劝导和规范再教育两种策略渗透校园生活。随后,这一现象促使三个ptkin决定他们的制度回应,其主要目的是使校园生活去极端化,并使伊斯兰主义意识形态在学术界失去合法性。机构的反应似乎对所有ptkin都至关重要,尤其是这三所入选的学校,因为校园是科学领域的所在地,而不是政治领域。此外,伊斯兰主义对印度尼西亚共和国统一国家(NKRI)的完整和作为宇宙祝福的宗教理想都是一个现实的威胁。
The Institutional Responses of State Islamic Universities to Islamism: Lessons Learned from Three Campuses
This study attempts to reveal the trend of Islamism and the institutional responses to it in Indonesian higher education, especially in the Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri or State Islamic Universities (PTKIN). Three PTKINs, which were UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, and IAIN Jember, were purposively selected as the research locus. Meanwhile, a case study approach was used to describe Islamism’s trend at these state universities from the 2000s to 2017. It was discovered that the Islamists attempted to infiltrate the campus life through two strategies, which were called persuasive and normative-reeducative. Subsequently, this phenomenon urged the three PTKINs to decide their institutional responses, which have been mainly aimed at deradicalizing campus life and delegitimizing Islamism’s ideology among academics. The institutional responses seem to be pivotal for all PTKINs, especially the three selected schools, because the campus is home to the scientific realm and not a political one. Also, Islamism is a factual threat, both to the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) and the ideals of the religion as a blessing for the universe.