{"title":"无侧支付的合作博弈的Von neumann-morgenstern解决方案","authors":"R. Aumann, B. Peleg","doi":"10.1090/S0002-9904-1960-10418-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of side payments in the classical theory of ^-person games involves three restrictive assumptions. First, there must be a common medium of exchange (such as money) in which the side payments may be effected; next, the side payments must be physically and legally feasible; and finally, it is assumed that utility is \"unrestrictedly transferable,\" i.e. that each player's utility for money is a linear function of the amount of money. These assumptions severely limit the applicability of the classical theory; in particular, the last assumption has been characterized by Luce and Raiffa [2, p. 233] as being \"exceedingly restrictive—for many purposes it renders nperson theory next to useless.\" It is the purpose of this paper to present the outline of a theory that parallels the classical theory, but makes no use of side payments.* Our definitions are related to those given in [2, p. 234] and in [3], but whereas the previous work went no further than proposing definitions, the theory outlined here contains results which generalize a considerable portion of the classical theory. I t thus demonstrates that the restrictive side payment assumption is not necessary for the development of a theory based on the ideas of von Neumann and Morgenstern. Only a general description of the theory and statements of the more important theorems will be included here; details and proofs will be published elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":117054,"journal":{"name":"Classics in Game Theory","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1960-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"97","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VON NEUMANN-MORGENSTERN SOLUTIONS TO COOPERATIVE GAMES WITHOUT SIDE PAYMENTS\",\"authors\":\"R. Aumann, B. Peleg\",\"doi\":\"10.1090/S0002-9904-1960-10418-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of side payments in the classical theory of ^-person games involves three restrictive assumptions. First, there must be a common medium of exchange (such as money) in which the side payments may be effected; next, the side payments must be physically and legally feasible; and finally, it is assumed that utility is \\\"unrestrictedly transferable,\\\" i.e. that each player's utility for money is a linear function of the amount of money. These assumptions severely limit the applicability of the classical theory; in particular, the last assumption has been characterized by Luce and Raiffa [2, p. 233] as being \\\"exceedingly restrictive—for many purposes it renders nperson theory next to useless.\\\" It is the purpose of this paper to present the outline of a theory that parallels the classical theory, but makes no use of side payments.* Our definitions are related to those given in [2, p. 234] and in [3], but whereas the previous work went no further than proposing definitions, the theory outlined here contains results which generalize a considerable portion of the classical theory. I t thus demonstrates that the restrictive side payment assumption is not necessary for the development of a theory based on the ideas of von Neumann and Morgenstern. Only a general description of the theory and statements of the more important theorems will be included here; details and proofs will be published elsewhere.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Classics in Game Theory\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1960-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"97\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Classics in Game Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1960-10418-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classics in Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1960-10418-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
VON NEUMANN-MORGENSTERN SOLUTIONS TO COOPERATIVE GAMES WITHOUT SIDE PAYMENTS
The use of side payments in the classical theory of ^-person games involves three restrictive assumptions. First, there must be a common medium of exchange (such as money) in which the side payments may be effected; next, the side payments must be physically and legally feasible; and finally, it is assumed that utility is "unrestrictedly transferable," i.e. that each player's utility for money is a linear function of the amount of money. These assumptions severely limit the applicability of the classical theory; in particular, the last assumption has been characterized by Luce and Raiffa [2, p. 233] as being "exceedingly restrictive—for many purposes it renders nperson theory next to useless." It is the purpose of this paper to present the outline of a theory that parallels the classical theory, but makes no use of side payments.* Our definitions are related to those given in [2, p. 234] and in [3], but whereas the previous work went no further than proposing definitions, the theory outlined here contains results which generalize a considerable portion of the classical theory. I t thus demonstrates that the restrictive side payment assumption is not necessary for the development of a theory based on the ideas of von Neumann and Morgenstern. Only a general description of the theory and statements of the more important theorems will be included here; details and proofs will be published elsewhere.