施工中的参数化建模:调查基于规则的检查质量

D. Warren
{"title":"施工中的参数化建模:调查基于规则的检查质量","authors":"D. Warren","doi":"10.2495/bim190061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As thinking moves away from 3D visualisation towards information quality and speed of data exchange, [1], the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry is seeking efficiency via the automation of checking. This study aims to examine the current quality of the checking in design, how it is controlled, and the adoption of automatic checking using rule-based checking software. It is based on the hypotheses that there is a need for automation that will improve quality; a need of a means to achieve automation and a need for understanding in industry. After the investigation of quality in design, this paper poses three questions: first, can a quality system be applied to automatic checking in design?; second, if the potential for rule-based checking is understood and utilised, could quality be assured?; and third, can we identify the optimal balance between manual and automatic checking? The conclusion shows that AEC professionals have low confidence in the quality of design data; the current balance is heavily in favour of manual checking, and while the potential for automatic checking is known, its current utilisation is lacking due to complexity, poor software support and a lack of training. Alarmingly, there is an indication that the majority who deal with automatic checking have no system of validation for new checking rules and only a minority had training in rule authorship.","PeriodicalId":264899,"journal":{"name":"Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Construction and Operations III","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PARAMETRIC MODELLING IN CONSTRUCTION: INVESTIGATING THE QUALITY OF RULE-BASED CHECKING\",\"authors\":\"D. Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/bim190061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As thinking moves away from 3D visualisation towards information quality and speed of data exchange, [1], the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry is seeking efficiency via the automation of checking. This study aims to examine the current quality of the checking in design, how it is controlled, and the adoption of automatic checking using rule-based checking software. It is based on the hypotheses that there is a need for automation that will improve quality; a need of a means to achieve automation and a need for understanding in industry. After the investigation of quality in design, this paper poses three questions: first, can a quality system be applied to automatic checking in design?; second, if the potential for rule-based checking is understood and utilised, could quality be assured?; and third, can we identify the optimal balance between manual and automatic checking? The conclusion shows that AEC professionals have low confidence in the quality of design data; the current balance is heavily in favour of manual checking, and while the potential for automatic checking is known, its current utilisation is lacking due to complexity, poor software support and a lack of training. Alarmingly, there is an indication that the majority who deal with automatic checking have no system of validation for new checking rules and only a minority had training in rule authorship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Construction and Operations III\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Construction and Operations III\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/bim190061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Construction and Operations III","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/bim190061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着思维从3D可视化转向信息质量和数据交换速度[1],建筑、工程和施工(AEC)行业正在通过自动化检查寻求效率。本研究旨在检视目前设计中检核的品质、如何加以控制,以及采用基于规则的检核软件进行自动检核。它是基于这样的假设:需要自动化来提高质量;需要一种实现自动化的手段,需要对工业的理解。本文通过对设计质量问题的研究,提出了三个问题:第一,质量体系能否应用于设计中的自动校核?其次,如果理解并利用基于规则的检查的潜力,质量能得到保证吗?第三,我们能否确定人工和自动检查之间的最佳平衡?结论表明:AEC专业人员对设计数据质量的信心较低;目前的平衡严重倾向于手动检查,虽然自动检查的潜力是已知的,但由于复杂性,较差的软件支持和缺乏培训,其目前的利用率不足。令人担忧的是,有迹象表明,大多数处理自动检查的人没有新检查规则的验证系统,只有少数人接受过规则撰写方面的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PARAMETRIC MODELLING IN CONSTRUCTION: INVESTIGATING THE QUALITY OF RULE-BASED CHECKING
As thinking moves away from 3D visualisation towards information quality and speed of data exchange, [1], the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry is seeking efficiency via the automation of checking. This study aims to examine the current quality of the checking in design, how it is controlled, and the adoption of automatic checking using rule-based checking software. It is based on the hypotheses that there is a need for automation that will improve quality; a need of a means to achieve automation and a need for understanding in industry. After the investigation of quality in design, this paper poses three questions: first, can a quality system be applied to automatic checking in design?; second, if the potential for rule-based checking is understood and utilised, could quality be assured?; and third, can we identify the optimal balance between manual and automatic checking? The conclusion shows that AEC professionals have low confidence in the quality of design data; the current balance is heavily in favour of manual checking, and while the potential for automatic checking is known, its current utilisation is lacking due to complexity, poor software support and a lack of training. Alarmingly, there is an indication that the majority who deal with automatic checking have no system of validation for new checking rules and only a minority had training in rule authorship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信