天然气装置产量配烃技术分析

S. Kanshio, P. Lekia
{"title":"天然气装置产量配烃技术分析","authors":"S. Kanshio, P. Lekia","doi":"10.2118/217216-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hydrocarbon commingling and the utilization of shared production and processing facilities are common practices in the oil and gas industry, serving as economic methods for field development and cost-effective gas monetization. However, the complexity of hydrocarbon commingling presents challenges in achieving accurate, traceable, and equitable allocation. This study explores patented methods, such as the differential and phase behavior model approaches, as well as established techniques like simple proportional and process modeling. Additionally, the newly developed compositional mass balance allocation method is investigated and compared against the benchmarked Unisim Utility Method.\n The findings indicate that the phase behavior method exhibits larger allocation deviations, while the differential method tends to over-allocate. The plain allocation method demonstrates a reasonable alignment with the Unisim Utility Method. However, the compositional mass balance method offers precise allocation. This research concludes that the compositional mass balance method serves as a dependable approach for natural gas plant allocation, warranting further consideration as a reference method within the industry.","PeriodicalId":407977,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Hydrocarbon Allocation Techniques for Natural Gas Plant Outputs\",\"authors\":\"S. Kanshio, P. Lekia\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/217216-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Hydrocarbon commingling and the utilization of shared production and processing facilities are common practices in the oil and gas industry, serving as economic methods for field development and cost-effective gas monetization. However, the complexity of hydrocarbon commingling presents challenges in achieving accurate, traceable, and equitable allocation. This study explores patented methods, such as the differential and phase behavior model approaches, as well as established techniques like simple proportional and process modeling. Additionally, the newly developed compositional mass balance allocation method is investigated and compared against the benchmarked Unisim Utility Method.\\n The findings indicate that the phase behavior method exhibits larger allocation deviations, while the differential method tends to over-allocate. The plain allocation method demonstrates a reasonable alignment with the Unisim Utility Method. However, the compositional mass balance method offers precise allocation. This research concludes that the compositional mass balance method serves as a dependable approach for natural gas plant allocation, warranting further consideration as a reference method within the industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/217216-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217216-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

油气混合和共享生产和加工设施的利用是油气行业的常见做法,是油田开发和经济高效的天然气货币化方法。然而,油气混合的复杂性给实现准确、可追溯和公平的分配带来了挑战。本研究探索了专利方法,如微分和相位行为模型方法,以及简单比例和过程建模等已建立的技术。此外,研究了新开发的成分质量平衡分配方法,并与基准的Unisim效用方法进行了比较。研究结果表明,相行为法的分配偏差较大,而微分法有过度分配的倾向。plain allocation方法与Unisim Utility method方法比较合理。然而,成分质量平衡法提供了精确的分配。本研究得出结论,组成质量平衡法是天然气厂配置的可靠方法,值得进一步考虑作为行业内的参考方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Hydrocarbon Allocation Techniques for Natural Gas Plant Outputs
Hydrocarbon commingling and the utilization of shared production and processing facilities are common practices in the oil and gas industry, serving as economic methods for field development and cost-effective gas monetization. However, the complexity of hydrocarbon commingling presents challenges in achieving accurate, traceable, and equitable allocation. This study explores patented methods, such as the differential and phase behavior model approaches, as well as established techniques like simple proportional and process modeling. Additionally, the newly developed compositional mass balance allocation method is investigated and compared against the benchmarked Unisim Utility Method. The findings indicate that the phase behavior method exhibits larger allocation deviations, while the differential method tends to over-allocate. The plain allocation method demonstrates a reasonable alignment with the Unisim Utility Method. However, the compositional mass balance method offers precise allocation. This research concludes that the compositional mass balance method serves as a dependable approach for natural gas plant allocation, warranting further consideration as a reference method within the industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信