广州和孟买的城市重建

Xuefei Ren
{"title":"广州和孟买的城市重建","authors":"Xuefei Ren","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvtxw2r1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter compares urban village and slum redevelopment in Guangzhou and Mumbai. It talks about the redevelopment of urban villages in Guangzhou that has displaced migrant tenants who lack local hukou and has enriched villager-landlords who have hukou and are also members of the incorporated village companies. It also explains the eligibility of slum residents in Mumbai for compensation that is decided according to when the residents settled in the slum and which can be negotiated through mobilization efforts by residents and housing non-government organizations (NGOs). The chapter explores how the two cities deploy different forms of exclusion that exemplifies territorial and associational forms of governance at work. It also reviews the use of hukou and membership in village companies in Guangzhou and a negotiable cut-off date in Mumbai.","PeriodicalId":360053,"journal":{"name":"Governing the Urban in China and India","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban Redevelopment in Guangzhou and Mumbai\",\"authors\":\"Xuefei Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvtxw2r1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter compares urban village and slum redevelopment in Guangzhou and Mumbai. It talks about the redevelopment of urban villages in Guangzhou that has displaced migrant tenants who lack local hukou and has enriched villager-landlords who have hukou and are also members of the incorporated village companies. It also explains the eligibility of slum residents in Mumbai for compensation that is decided according to when the residents settled in the slum and which can be negotiated through mobilization efforts by residents and housing non-government organizations (NGOs). The chapter explores how the two cities deploy different forms of exclusion that exemplifies territorial and associational forms of governance at work. It also reviews the use of hukou and membership in village companies in Guangzhou and a negotiable cut-off date in Mumbai.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Governing the Urban in China and India\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Governing the Urban in China and India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvtxw2r1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governing the Urban in China and India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvtxw2r1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章对广州和孟买的城中村和贫民窟改造进行了比较。它讲述了广州城中村的再开发,它赶走了没有当地户口的外来租户,让拥有户口、同时也是村法人公司成员的村房东富裕起来。它还解释了孟买贫民窟居民是否有资格获得补偿,这取决于居民何时在贫民窟定居,并可以通过居民和住房非政府组织的动员努力进行谈判。本章探讨了这两个城市如何部署不同形式的排斥,这体现了在工作中的领土和协会形式的治理。它还审查了广州农村公司户口和会员资格的使用情况,以及孟买可协商的截止日期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urban Redevelopment in Guangzhou and Mumbai
This chapter compares urban village and slum redevelopment in Guangzhou and Mumbai. It talks about the redevelopment of urban villages in Guangzhou that has displaced migrant tenants who lack local hukou and has enriched villager-landlords who have hukou and are also members of the incorporated village companies. It also explains the eligibility of slum residents in Mumbai for compensation that is decided according to when the residents settled in the slum and which can be negotiated through mobilization efforts by residents and housing non-government organizations (NGOs). The chapter explores how the two cities deploy different forms of exclusion that exemplifies territorial and associational forms of governance at work. It also reviews the use of hukou and membership in village companies in Guangzhou and a negotiable cut-off date in Mumbai.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信