行动西兰迪亚,新西兰雄心勃勃的布朗衫队

C. Wilson, James Halpin
{"title":"行动西兰迪亚,新西兰雄心勃勃的布朗衫队","authors":"C. Wilson, James Halpin","doi":"10.36878/nsj20230319.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most far right terrorist violence is now committed by individuals who have radicalised in physical isolation, although often deeply engaged in online extremist communities. At the same time, many far right groups do not engage in terrorism despite the militant views and violent rhetoric of their members. This article contributes to the study of the avoidance of mass casualty terrorism by extremist groups through an in-depth examination of New Zealand’s main white nationalist group, Action Zealandia. The literature on this topic finds that groups sometimes strategize that terrorist attacks would be counter-productive to longer term and more important political goals. Our study of Action Zealandia, based on eighteen months of participation in the group by one of the authors, supports this hypothesis. We contend that groups such as Action Zealandia often see themselves as the seeds of a mass nationalist movement rather than the perpetrators of mass casual-ty terrorist violence. We therefore propose a typology of violent far right extremist actors: Individual Actor; Paramilitary Group; and Terrorist Group. We place Action Zealandia within the Paramilitary Group type, a category of extremist actors that poses a less violent but longer-term risk to society.","PeriodicalId":201862,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand and Counter Terrorism Special Issue","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Action Zealandia, New Zealand’s Aspiring Brownshirts\",\"authors\":\"C. Wilson, James Halpin\",\"doi\":\"10.36878/nsj20230319.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most far right terrorist violence is now committed by individuals who have radicalised in physical isolation, although often deeply engaged in online extremist communities. At the same time, many far right groups do not engage in terrorism despite the militant views and violent rhetoric of their members. This article contributes to the study of the avoidance of mass casualty terrorism by extremist groups through an in-depth examination of New Zealand’s main white nationalist group, Action Zealandia. The literature on this topic finds that groups sometimes strategize that terrorist attacks would be counter-productive to longer term and more important political goals. Our study of Action Zealandia, based on eighteen months of participation in the group by one of the authors, supports this hypothesis. We contend that groups such as Action Zealandia often see themselves as the seeds of a mass nationalist movement rather than the perpetrators of mass casual-ty terrorist violence. We therefore propose a typology of violent far right extremist actors: Individual Actor; Paramilitary Group; and Terrorist Group. We place Action Zealandia within the Paramilitary Group type, a category of extremist actors that poses a less violent but longer-term risk to society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand and Counter Terrorism Special Issue\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand and Counter Terrorism Special Issue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36878/nsj20230319.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand and Counter Terrorism Special Issue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36878/nsj20230319.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,大多数极右翼恐怖主义暴力行为都是由在与世隔绝的情况下变得激进的个人实施的,尽管他们往往深度参与网络极端主义社区。与此同时,许多极右翼组织并不参与恐怖主义,尽管他们的成员有激进的观点和暴力的言论。本文通过深入考察新西兰主要的白人民族主义团体“行动西兰迪亚”,有助于研究极端主义团体如何避免大规模伤亡的恐怖主义。关于这一主题的文献发现,组织有时会制定战略,认为恐怖袭击会对长期和更重要的政治目标产生反作用。我们对“行动西兰迪亚”的研究,基于其中一位作者参与该小组18个月的经历,支持了这一假设。我们认为,像“西兰迪亚行动”这样的团体往往认为自己是大规模民族主义运动的种子,而不是造成大规模伤亡的恐怖主义暴力的肇事者。因此,我们提出了一种暴力极右极端主义行动者的类型学:个体行动者;准军事集团;和恐怖组织。我们将“西兰迪亚行动”归为准军事组织类型,这是一类极端主义行为者,其暴力程度较低,但对社会构成较长期的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Action Zealandia, New Zealand’s Aspiring Brownshirts
Most far right terrorist violence is now committed by individuals who have radicalised in physical isolation, although often deeply engaged in online extremist communities. At the same time, many far right groups do not engage in terrorism despite the militant views and violent rhetoric of their members. This article contributes to the study of the avoidance of mass casualty terrorism by extremist groups through an in-depth examination of New Zealand’s main white nationalist group, Action Zealandia. The literature on this topic finds that groups sometimes strategize that terrorist attacks would be counter-productive to longer term and more important political goals. Our study of Action Zealandia, based on eighteen months of participation in the group by one of the authors, supports this hypothesis. We contend that groups such as Action Zealandia often see themselves as the seeds of a mass nationalist movement rather than the perpetrators of mass casual-ty terrorist violence. We therefore propose a typology of violent far right extremist actors: Individual Actor; Paramilitary Group; and Terrorist Group. We place Action Zealandia within the Paramilitary Group type, a category of extremist actors that poses a less violent but longer-term risk to society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信