频谱5.0:重新思考最佳5G部署频谱奖

G. Pogorel
{"title":"频谱5.0:重新思考最佳5G部署频谱奖","authors":"G. Pogorel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3262740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased competition in telecommunications services in the past two decades has generated considerable benefits for Europe’s citizens, consumers, industry and governments. More recently concern has grown regarding the relatively slow pace of 4G network deployment and fears that delays could be repeated with 5G. This paper analyses the role spectrum assignment policies have played in this mixed picture and concludes that the design of spectrum awards in a 5G context should evolve to place more emphasis on promoting infrastructure deployment. Examples of policy decisions impacting market outputs are used to support our argumentation with evidence drawn from recent in-depth studies and examples covering the main European markets. These suggest it is time to re-evaluate whether the amount of revenue raised should be the overriding measure of spectrum auction success, and whether auctions on fees are the most effective means of promoting competition and driving investment. We survey the analyses of causal relationship and trade-offs between various assignment methods and fee structures and conclude with considerations and guidelines for more effective and balanced spectrum assignment designs. As EU regulators consider reforms in this area the key challenge is how to align award processes with broader economic and societal objectives. We hope our paper can make a constructive contribution in this respect .","PeriodicalId":222637,"journal":{"name":"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Research Paper Series","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spectrum 5.0: Re-Thinking Spectrum Awards for Optimal 5G Deployment\",\"authors\":\"G. Pogorel\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3262740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increased competition in telecommunications services in the past two decades has generated considerable benefits for Europe’s citizens, consumers, industry and governments. More recently concern has grown regarding the relatively slow pace of 4G network deployment and fears that delays could be repeated with 5G. This paper analyses the role spectrum assignment policies have played in this mixed picture and concludes that the design of spectrum awards in a 5G context should evolve to place more emphasis on promoting infrastructure deployment. Examples of policy decisions impacting market outputs are used to support our argumentation with evidence drawn from recent in-depth studies and examples covering the main European markets. These suggest it is time to re-evaluate whether the amount of revenue raised should be the overriding measure of spectrum auction success, and whether auctions on fees are the most effective means of promoting competition and driving investment. We survey the analyses of causal relationship and trade-offs between various assignment methods and fee structures and conclude with considerations and guidelines for more effective and balanced spectrum assignment designs. As EU regulators consider reforms in this area the key challenge is how to align award processes with broader economic and societal objectives. We hope our paper can make a constructive contribution in this respect .\",\"PeriodicalId\":222637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3262740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3262740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

过去二十年来,电信服务领域日益激烈的竞争为欧洲公民、消费者、行业和政府带来了可观的利益。最近,人们越来越担心4G网络部署速度相对较慢,并担心5G可能会再次出现延迟。本文分析了频谱分配政策在这种复杂的情况下所扮演的角色,并得出结论,5G背景下的频谱分配设计应该更加注重促进基础设施的部署。政策决定影响市场产出的例子被用来支持我们的论点,证据来自最近的深入研究和覆盖主要欧洲市场的例子。这些都表明,现在是时候重新评估,是否应将所得收入的多少作为频谱拍卖成功与否的最重要衡量标准,以及收费拍卖是否是促进竞争和推动投资的最有效手段。我们调查了各种分配方法和费用结构之间的因果关系和权衡的分析,并总结了更有效和平衡的频谱分配设计的考虑和指导方针。随着欧盟监管机构考虑在这一领域进行改革,关键的挑战是如何使奖励程序与更广泛的经济和社会目标保持一致。我们希望我们的论文能够在这方面作出建设性的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spectrum 5.0: Re-Thinking Spectrum Awards for Optimal 5G Deployment
Increased competition in telecommunications services in the past two decades has generated considerable benefits for Europe’s citizens, consumers, industry and governments. More recently concern has grown regarding the relatively slow pace of 4G network deployment and fears that delays could be repeated with 5G. This paper analyses the role spectrum assignment policies have played in this mixed picture and concludes that the design of spectrum awards in a 5G context should evolve to place more emphasis on promoting infrastructure deployment. Examples of policy decisions impacting market outputs are used to support our argumentation with evidence drawn from recent in-depth studies and examples covering the main European markets. These suggest it is time to re-evaluate whether the amount of revenue raised should be the overriding measure of spectrum auction success, and whether auctions on fees are the most effective means of promoting competition and driving investment. We survey the analyses of causal relationship and trade-offs between various assignment methods and fee structures and conclude with considerations and guidelines for more effective and balanced spectrum assignment designs. As EU regulators consider reforms in this area the key challenge is how to align award processes with broader economic and societal objectives. We hope our paper can make a constructive contribution in this respect .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信