行动研究作为软件工程环境中产学研合作的模型

K. Petersen, Çigdem Gencel, Negin Asghari, D. Baca, Stefanie Betz
{"title":"行动研究作为软件工程环境中产学研合作的模型","authors":"K. Petersen, Çigdem Gencel, Negin Asghari, D. Baca, Stefanie Betz","doi":"10.1145/2647648.2647656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Action research is a well-established research methodology. It is following a post-positivist research philosophy grounded in critical thinking. The methodology is driven by practical problems, emphasis participatory research, and develops practically useful solutions in an iterative manner. Objective: Two objectives are to be achieved: (1) Understanding the state of the art with respect to action research usage in the software engineering literature, and (2) reflecting and providing recommendations of how to foster industry-academia collaboration through action research. Method:} Based on our experience with two action research studies in close collaboration with Ericsson lessons learned and guidelines are presented. Results: In both cases presented action research led to multiple refinements in the interventions implemented. Furthermore, the close collaboration and co-production with the industry was essential to identify and describe the required refinements to provide an in-depth understanding. In comparison with previous studies, we required multiple iterations while previous software engineering studies reported mostly one iteration, or were not explicit regarding the number of iterations studied. Conclusion: We conclude that action research is a powerful tool for industry-academia collaboration. The success of the method highly depends on the researchers and practitioners working in a team. Future studies need to improve the reporting with respect to describing the type of action research used, the iterations, the model of collaboration, and the rationales for changes in each iteration.","PeriodicalId":196566,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 international workshop on Long-term industrial collaboration on software engineering","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"55","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Action research as a model for industry-academia collaboration in the software engineering context\",\"authors\":\"K. Petersen, Çigdem Gencel, Negin Asghari, D. Baca, Stefanie Betz\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2647648.2647656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Action research is a well-established research methodology. It is following a post-positivist research philosophy grounded in critical thinking. The methodology is driven by practical problems, emphasis participatory research, and develops practically useful solutions in an iterative manner. Objective: Two objectives are to be achieved: (1) Understanding the state of the art with respect to action research usage in the software engineering literature, and (2) reflecting and providing recommendations of how to foster industry-academia collaboration through action research. Method:} Based on our experience with two action research studies in close collaboration with Ericsson lessons learned and guidelines are presented. Results: In both cases presented action research led to multiple refinements in the interventions implemented. Furthermore, the close collaboration and co-production with the industry was essential to identify and describe the required refinements to provide an in-depth understanding. In comparison with previous studies, we required multiple iterations while previous software engineering studies reported mostly one iteration, or were not explicit regarding the number of iterations studied. Conclusion: We conclude that action research is a powerful tool for industry-academia collaboration. The success of the method highly depends on the researchers and practitioners working in a team. Future studies need to improve the reporting with respect to describing the type of action research used, the iterations, the model of collaboration, and the rationales for changes in each iteration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 international workshop on Long-term industrial collaboration on software engineering\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"55\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 international workshop on Long-term industrial collaboration on software engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2647648.2647656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 international workshop on Long-term industrial collaboration on software engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2647648.2647656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

摘要

背景:行动研究是一种成熟的研究方法。它遵循一种以批判性思维为基础的后实证主义研究哲学。该方法以实际问题为导向,强调参与性研究,并以迭代的方式开发实际有用的解决方案。目标:要达到两个目标:(1)了解软件工程文献中关于行动研究使用的最新情况,以及(2)反映并提供如何通过行动研究促进产学研合作的建议。方法:根据我们与爱立信密切合作进行的两项行动研究的经验,提出了经验教训和指导方针。结果:在这两个案例中,行动研究导致了实施干预措施的多重改进。此外,与行业的密切合作和共同生产对于确定和描述所需的改进以提供深入的理解至关重要。与以前的研究相比,我们需要多次迭代,而以前的软件工程研究主要报告一次迭代,或者没有明确地考虑所研究的迭代的数量。结论:行动研究是产学研合作的有力工具。该方法的成功在很大程度上取决于研究人员和实践者在一个团队中工作。未来的研究需要在描述所使用的行动研究的类型、迭代、协作模型以及每次迭代中变化的基本原理方面改进报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Action research as a model for industry-academia collaboration in the software engineering context
Background: Action research is a well-established research methodology. It is following a post-positivist research philosophy grounded in critical thinking. The methodology is driven by practical problems, emphasis participatory research, and develops practically useful solutions in an iterative manner. Objective: Two objectives are to be achieved: (1) Understanding the state of the art with respect to action research usage in the software engineering literature, and (2) reflecting and providing recommendations of how to foster industry-academia collaboration through action research. Method:} Based on our experience with two action research studies in close collaboration with Ericsson lessons learned and guidelines are presented. Results: In both cases presented action research led to multiple refinements in the interventions implemented. Furthermore, the close collaboration and co-production with the industry was essential to identify and describe the required refinements to provide an in-depth understanding. In comparison with previous studies, we required multiple iterations while previous software engineering studies reported mostly one iteration, or were not explicit regarding the number of iterations studied. Conclusion: We conclude that action research is a powerful tool for industry-academia collaboration. The success of the method highly depends on the researchers and practitioners working in a team. Future studies need to improve the reporting with respect to describing the type of action research used, the iterations, the model of collaboration, and the rationales for changes in each iteration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信