复杂冲突形势的概念是国际问题新闻报道的术语工具包的扩大

Maryna Kovalska
{"title":"复杂冲突形势的概念是国际问题新闻报道的术语工具包的扩大","authors":"Maryna Kovalska","doi":"10.18524/2308-3255.2022.28.268482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is concentrated on the study of the possibilities of enlargement the terminological aspect of the international issues of mass media due to the use of current conceipts and terms of scientific literature upon international relations. The author’s attention is focused on the approaches conceiving the complicated conflict landscape of today. The problem of defining the term the Gray Zone (or Grey Zone) and the possibility of using relevant terms in the journalistic text while analyzing modern international conflicts is considered in detail. It is proposed to deepen the level of analysis of hybrid war phenomena due to the use of the terms “complicated conflict landscape/“gray zone”/“gray strategy” by journalists writing on international topics.\nWith regard to the Russian-Ukrainian war, the correct use of the terms of international issues of mass media is of great importance. In terms of the application of concepts and terms, it is necessary to distinguish in which journalistic genres the author is expected to address this problem, namely, which material is being written: is it informational or analytical one. According to the informational genres, if the mass media reports on a separate event that is clearly in the context of the “gray zone” phenomenon, a brief description of the level of the complicated conflict landscape can act as a background. Analytical genres look quite promising because of a more complex terminological level is assumed.\nIn its further perspectives, the research is focused on the optimization of the practical side, the available results of the study can be used to improve the training of international journalists, in particular, it seems quite logical to take a future scientific task to clarify the terms of a secondary level.","PeriodicalId":444448,"journal":{"name":"Dialog: media studios","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The conceipts of a complex conflict landscape as an enlargement of the terminological toolkit of the journalistic covering of international issues\",\"authors\":\"Maryna Kovalska\",\"doi\":\"10.18524/2308-3255.2022.28.268482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is concentrated on the study of the possibilities of enlargement the terminological aspect of the international issues of mass media due to the use of current conceipts and terms of scientific literature upon international relations. The author’s attention is focused on the approaches conceiving the complicated conflict landscape of today. The problem of defining the term the Gray Zone (or Grey Zone) and the possibility of using relevant terms in the journalistic text while analyzing modern international conflicts is considered in detail. It is proposed to deepen the level of analysis of hybrid war phenomena due to the use of the terms “complicated conflict landscape/“gray zone”/“gray strategy” by journalists writing on international topics.\\nWith regard to the Russian-Ukrainian war, the correct use of the terms of international issues of mass media is of great importance. In terms of the application of concepts and terms, it is necessary to distinguish in which journalistic genres the author is expected to address this problem, namely, which material is being written: is it informational or analytical one. According to the informational genres, if the mass media reports on a separate event that is clearly in the context of the “gray zone” phenomenon, a brief description of the level of the complicated conflict landscape can act as a background. Analytical genres look quite promising because of a more complex terminological level is assumed.\\nIn its further perspectives, the research is focused on the optimization of the practical side, the available results of the study can be used to improve the training of international journalists, in particular, it seems quite logical to take a future scientific task to clarify the terms of a secondary level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialog: media studios\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialog: media studios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18524/2308-3255.2022.28.268482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialog: media studios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2308-3255.2022.28.268482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的重点是研究由于使用有关国际关系的科学文献的现行概念和术语,扩大大众传媒国际问题术语方面的可能性。作者的注意力集中在构思当今复杂冲突格局的方法上。在分析现代国际冲突时,对“灰色地带”一词的定义问题以及在新闻文本中使用相关术语的可能性进行了详细的探讨。由于记者在国际话题写作中使用“复杂冲突格局”/“灰色地带”/“灰色战略”等术语,建议加深对混合战争现象的分析水平。就俄乌战争而言,正确使用大众传媒的国际问题术语是非常重要的。在概念和术语的应用方面,有必要区分作者希望用哪种新闻体裁来解决这个问题,也就是说,写的是哪种材料:是信息性的还是分析性的。根据信息类型,如果大众传播媒介报道的是一个明显处于“灰色地带”现象背景下的单独事件,那么对复杂冲突局势的程度的简要描述可以作为背景。分析类型看起来很有前途,因为假设了一个更复杂的术语层次。从进一步的角度看,本研究侧重于实践方面的优化,现有的研究结果可用于提高国际新闻工作者的培训水平,特别是采取一项未来的科学任务来澄清二级层次的术语似乎是合乎逻辑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The conceipts of a complex conflict landscape as an enlargement of the terminological toolkit of the journalistic covering of international issues
The article is concentrated on the study of the possibilities of enlargement the terminological aspect of the international issues of mass media due to the use of current conceipts and terms of scientific literature upon international relations. The author’s attention is focused on the approaches conceiving the complicated conflict landscape of today. The problem of defining the term the Gray Zone (or Grey Zone) and the possibility of using relevant terms in the journalistic text while analyzing modern international conflicts is considered in detail. It is proposed to deepen the level of analysis of hybrid war phenomena due to the use of the terms “complicated conflict landscape/“gray zone”/“gray strategy” by journalists writing on international topics. With regard to the Russian-Ukrainian war, the correct use of the terms of international issues of mass media is of great importance. In terms of the application of concepts and terms, it is necessary to distinguish in which journalistic genres the author is expected to address this problem, namely, which material is being written: is it informational or analytical one. According to the informational genres, if the mass media reports on a separate event that is clearly in the context of the “gray zone” phenomenon, a brief description of the level of the complicated conflict landscape can act as a background. Analytical genres look quite promising because of a more complex terminological level is assumed. In its further perspectives, the research is focused on the optimization of the practical side, the available results of the study can be used to improve the training of international journalists, in particular, it seems quite logical to take a future scientific task to clarify the terms of a secondary level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信