邻居去了:NZE被动屋如何改变社区文化

Charles Mcbride
{"title":"邻居去了:NZE被动屋如何改变社区文化","authors":"Charles Mcbride","doi":"10.35483/acsa.aia.fallintercarbon.20.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2019 a small, single-family house was sold to a family excited to be part of a trailblazing and strangely controversial project. While many net zero energy (NZE) and/or Passive House examples have now been completed across the US, small communities, especially in the flyover country of the upper Midwest, have proudly doubled down against the “unknown” of these new models, reinforcing traditional project delivery and the absence of energy codes. This project and initiative not only serves as an example for students and evolving pedagogy, but also has become a touchstone in the community, challenging the preconceptions of modern design, neighborhood investment, homebuilding practice, and the public image of a university grappling with an evolving “design culture.” The complexities of any architectural project are numerous but often predictable. Like any student design-build project, this house dealt with its share of delays and changes. And like any grant-funded project, it dealt with additional oversight, reviews and red tape. Now in its final phase, the project begins post-occupancy monitoring. Teaching the homeowners about building performance blends the pragmatics of understanding equipment with the global responsibility and mission of NZE and passive house. An early decision to work within an existing, walkable neighborhood lead unexpectedly to a very public debate on neighborhood design. These and other lessons are a reminder that architectural practice requires teaching your client, and often, your community. This paper will focus on the larger impact that the house continues to have on both the community and university. This includes the cultural challenges of meeting design expectations, the potential of infill as a community revitalization tool, and convincing a skeptical public that energy consciousness and evolving construction techniques have real value. It will also discuss how these issues, understood and accepted as given within the design and academic community, are still radically new in this (and many) regions across the country. A discussion of pedagogy and community design are balanced with quantitative energy data, impact, and continuing observation.","PeriodicalId":288990,"journal":{"name":"2020 AIA/ACSA Intersections Research Conference: CARBON","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"There Goes the Neighborhood: How a NZE Passive House Changed the Culture of a Community\",\"authors\":\"Charles Mcbride\",\"doi\":\"10.35483/acsa.aia.fallintercarbon.20.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2019 a small, single-family house was sold to a family excited to be part of a trailblazing and strangely controversial project. While many net zero energy (NZE) and/or Passive House examples have now been completed across the US, small communities, especially in the flyover country of the upper Midwest, have proudly doubled down against the “unknown” of these new models, reinforcing traditional project delivery and the absence of energy codes. This project and initiative not only serves as an example for students and evolving pedagogy, but also has become a touchstone in the community, challenging the preconceptions of modern design, neighborhood investment, homebuilding practice, and the public image of a university grappling with an evolving “design culture.” The complexities of any architectural project are numerous but often predictable. Like any student design-build project, this house dealt with its share of delays and changes. And like any grant-funded project, it dealt with additional oversight, reviews and red tape. Now in its final phase, the project begins post-occupancy monitoring. Teaching the homeowners about building performance blends the pragmatics of understanding equipment with the global responsibility and mission of NZE and passive house. An early decision to work within an existing, walkable neighborhood lead unexpectedly to a very public debate on neighborhood design. These and other lessons are a reminder that architectural practice requires teaching your client, and often, your community. This paper will focus on the larger impact that the house continues to have on both the community and university. This includes the cultural challenges of meeting design expectations, the potential of infill as a community revitalization tool, and convincing a skeptical public that energy consciousness and evolving construction techniques have real value. It will also discuss how these issues, understood and accepted as given within the design and academic community, are still radically new in this (and many) regions across the country. A discussion of pedagogy and community design are balanced with quantitative energy data, impact, and continuing observation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 AIA/ACSA Intersections Research Conference: CARBON\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 AIA/ACSA Intersections Research Conference: CARBON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.aia.fallintercarbon.20.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 AIA/ACSA Intersections Research Conference: CARBON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.aia.fallintercarbon.20.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年,一个小的单户住宅被卖给了一个家庭,这个家庭很高兴成为这个开创性的、奇怪的有争议的项目的一部分。虽然许多净零能耗(NZE)和/或被动式房屋的例子现在已经在美国各地完成,但小型社区,特别是在中西部上游的立交桥国家,已经自豪地加倍反对这些新模式的“未知”,加强了传统的项目交付和缺乏能源规范。这个项目和倡议不仅是学生和不断发展的教学法的典范,而且已经成为社区的试金石,挑战了现代设计、社区投资、住宅建筑实践的先入为主的观念,以及一所大学在不断发展的“设计文化”中的公众形象。任何架构项目的复杂性都很多,但通常是可预测的。像任何学生设计建造项目一样,这座房子也面临着延迟和变化。和任何由拨款资助的项目一样,它也面临着额外的监督、审查和繁文缛节。该项目现已进入最后阶段,开始进行入住后监测。向业主传授有关建筑性能的知识,将理解设备的语用学与NZE和被动式房屋的全球责任和使命融为一体。一个早期的决定是在一个现有的、可步行的社区内工作,这意外地引发了一场关于社区设计的非常公开的辩论。这些和其他的经验教训提醒我们,建筑实践需要教导您的客户,通常还需要教导您的社区。本文将重点关注该住宅继续对社区和大学产生的更大影响。这包括满足设计期望的文化挑战,填充作为社区振兴工具的潜力,以及说服持怀疑态度的公众,能源意识和不断发展的建筑技术具有真正的价值。它还将讨论这些问题,在设计和学术界被理解和接受,在这个(以及全国许多)地区仍然是全新的。对教学法和社区设计的讨论与定量能源数据、影响和持续观察相平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
There Goes the Neighborhood: How a NZE Passive House Changed the Culture of a Community
In 2019 a small, single-family house was sold to a family excited to be part of a trailblazing and strangely controversial project. While many net zero energy (NZE) and/or Passive House examples have now been completed across the US, small communities, especially in the flyover country of the upper Midwest, have proudly doubled down against the “unknown” of these new models, reinforcing traditional project delivery and the absence of energy codes. This project and initiative not only serves as an example for students and evolving pedagogy, but also has become a touchstone in the community, challenging the preconceptions of modern design, neighborhood investment, homebuilding practice, and the public image of a university grappling with an evolving “design culture.” The complexities of any architectural project are numerous but often predictable. Like any student design-build project, this house dealt with its share of delays and changes. And like any grant-funded project, it dealt with additional oversight, reviews and red tape. Now in its final phase, the project begins post-occupancy monitoring. Teaching the homeowners about building performance blends the pragmatics of understanding equipment with the global responsibility and mission of NZE and passive house. An early decision to work within an existing, walkable neighborhood lead unexpectedly to a very public debate on neighborhood design. These and other lessons are a reminder that architectural practice requires teaching your client, and often, your community. This paper will focus on the larger impact that the house continues to have on both the community and university. This includes the cultural challenges of meeting design expectations, the potential of infill as a community revitalization tool, and convincing a skeptical public that energy consciousness and evolving construction techniques have real value. It will also discuss how these issues, understood and accepted as given within the design and academic community, are still radically new in this (and many) regions across the country. A discussion of pedagogy and community design are balanced with quantitative energy data, impact, and continuing observation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信