基于展开电路的降压逆变器与H5、H6、HERIC拓扑的比较分析

O. Matiushkin, O. Husev, D. Vinnikov, Naser Vosoughi Kurdkandi
{"title":"基于展开电路的降压逆变器与H5、H6、HERIC拓扑的比较分析","authors":"O. Matiushkin, O. Husev, D. Vinnikov, Naser Vosoughi Kurdkandi","doi":"10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the comparative analysis between the buck-boost inverters based on the unfolding circuit and H5, H6, Highly Efficient and Reliable Inverter Concept (HERIC) inverters. The components design guidelines are presented for each topology. A simple open-loop system was chosen for a verification. The comparison contains 4 criteria: an overall inductances energy, an overall capacitor energy, a total voltage stress on semiconductors and conduction losses of semiconductors and the passive elements. The main advantage of the traditional H5, H6 or HERIC topologies is a simplicity of the operation and freewheeling states. However, conventional solution produces a high leakage current, which should be reduced by the additional switches or the common-mode choke. Buck-boost inverters based on unfolding circuit have more conduction losses, but they require fewer passive components and produces small leakage current.","PeriodicalId":365235,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Buck-Boost Inverters Based on Unfolding Circuit Versus H5, H6, HERIC Topologies\",\"authors\":\"O. Matiushkin, O. Husev, D. Vinnikov, Naser Vosoughi Kurdkandi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the comparative analysis between the buck-boost inverters based on the unfolding circuit and H5, H6, Highly Efficient and Reliable Inverter Concept (HERIC) inverters. The components design guidelines are presented for each topology. A simple open-loop system was chosen for a verification. The comparison contains 4 criteria: an overall inductances energy, an overall capacitor energy, a total voltage stress on semiconductors and conduction losses of semiconductors and the passive elements. The main advantage of the traditional H5, H6 or HERIC topologies is a simplicity of the operation and freewheeling states. However, conventional solution produces a high leakage current, which should be reduced by the additional switches or the common-mode choke. Buck-boost inverters based on unfolding circuit have more conduction losses, but they require fewer passive components and produces small leakage current.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对基于展开电路的降压逆变器与H5、H6、高效可靠逆变器概念(HERIC)逆变器进行了比较分析。介绍了每种拓扑结构的组件设计指南。选择一个简单的开环系统进行验证。比较包含4个标准:总电感能量、总电容器能量、总半导体电压应力、半导体和无源元件的传导损耗。传统的H5、H6或HERIC拓扑的主要优点是操作简单,状态自由。然而,传统的解决方案产生高泄漏电流,这应该通过额外的开关或共模扼流圈来减少。基于展开电路的降压升压逆变器具有较大的传导损耗,但需要较少的无源元件,产生较小的漏电流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Buck-Boost Inverters Based on Unfolding Circuit Versus H5, H6, HERIC Topologies
This paper presents the comparative analysis between the buck-boost inverters based on the unfolding circuit and H5, H6, Highly Efficient and Reliable Inverter Concept (HERIC) inverters. The components design guidelines are presented for each topology. A simple open-loop system was chosen for a verification. The comparison contains 4 criteria: an overall inductances energy, an overall capacitor energy, a total voltage stress on semiconductors and conduction losses of semiconductors and the passive elements. The main advantage of the traditional H5, H6 or HERIC topologies is a simplicity of the operation and freewheeling states. However, conventional solution produces a high leakage current, which should be reduced by the additional switches or the common-mode choke. Buck-boost inverters based on unfolding circuit have more conduction losses, but they require fewer passive components and produces small leakage current.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信