{"title":"ACPR测量的多重激励","authors":"K. Remley","doi":"10.1109/MWSYM.2003.1210586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use a simulator to compare adjacent-channel power ratio (ACPR) measurements of a nonlinear device excited with various multisine signals to ACPR measurements of the same device excited with pseudorandom digital modulation. We examine four common types of multisine excitation, each with identical numbers of tones, tone-spacings, and nominal power levels, but with different magnitude and phase relationships between tones. We show that use of some common multisines may result in significant overestimation of the actual ACPR from the digitally modulated nonlinear device.","PeriodicalId":252251,"journal":{"name":"IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2003","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multisine excitation for ACPR measurements\",\"authors\":\"K. Remley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MWSYM.2003.1210586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use a simulator to compare adjacent-channel power ratio (ACPR) measurements of a nonlinear device excited with various multisine signals to ACPR measurements of the same device excited with pseudorandom digital modulation. We examine four common types of multisine excitation, each with identical numbers of tones, tone-spacings, and nominal power levels, but with different magnitude and phase relationships between tones. We show that use of some common multisines may result in significant overestimation of the actual ACPR from the digitally modulated nonlinear device.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2003\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2003\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2003.1210586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2003","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2003.1210586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We use a simulator to compare adjacent-channel power ratio (ACPR) measurements of a nonlinear device excited with various multisine signals to ACPR measurements of the same device excited with pseudorandom digital modulation. We examine four common types of multisine excitation, each with identical numbers of tones, tone-spacings, and nominal power levels, but with different magnitude and phase relationships between tones. We show that use of some common multisines may result in significant overestimation of the actual ACPR from the digitally modulated nonlinear device.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
