基于TPCK的马来西亚高等教育机构潜在教育技术能力标准评估方法

Y. Yusof, H. Jantan, Nurmuslimah Kamilah Abdullah
{"title":"基于TPCK的马来西亚高等教育机构潜在教育技术能力标准评估方法","authors":"Y. Yusof, H. Jantan, Nurmuslimah Kamilah Abdullah","doi":"10.24191/smrj.v15i1.4232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technology in education is purposely designed to help both educators and \nstudents in knowledge transfer and knowledge gain simultaneously. In many \naspects, technology in education is supposed to prove that education can \nbe delivered effectively and efficiently. However, there are cases in which \ntechnology in education can be frustrating and annoying for both parties. \nGovernment and university management have invested a lot of money to \nensure that educators and students can really benefit from the technology. \nIn spite of huge investment on educational technology tools (hardware and \nsoftware) over the past decades in various education initiatives, the potential \nof technology usage at university level has not reached the desired level \namong educators and students. What is the missing link for the realisation of \nthe expected return-of-investment? Recent researches (C Akarawang, 2015; \nBibi, 2017; Hersh, 2014) indicate that the problem is due to the gap between \ntechnical ICT skills and the knowledge of good pedagogical practice among \neducators. The outcome of this study proposes an Educational Technology \nstandard to be applied in university setting using TPCK (Technological \nPedagogical Content Knowledge) as the basic framework. However, this \npaper will only discuss a part of our standard development highlighting \nthe assessment method that was used during the implementation of ETC \n68 standard in our institutions. Overall, the descriptive result using pre and \npost means scores as assessment method towards proposed standard shows \nthat the educators’ acceptance score in our institutions are mostly good. \nHowever the element within the standard least accepted are TCK (Technology \nContent Knowledge) and TPK (Technology Pedagogical Knowledge). The \nassessment and finding in this study nevertheless are suggested to be used \nas a guidance for ETC Standard implementation in university setting in \norder to stress the importance of considering technological possibilities in \nlight of developmentally appropriate practices and specific learning goals \nin ICT/ET training provided for educators in HEI in Malaysia. \n  \nKeywords: educational technology; TPCK, ICT standard, university, \neducators, student","PeriodicalId":175901,"journal":{"name":"Social and Management Research Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment Method for Potential Educational Technology Competency Standard based on TPCK in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions\",\"authors\":\"Y. Yusof, H. Jantan, Nurmuslimah Kamilah Abdullah\",\"doi\":\"10.24191/smrj.v15i1.4232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technology in education is purposely designed to help both educators and \\nstudents in knowledge transfer and knowledge gain simultaneously. In many \\naspects, technology in education is supposed to prove that education can \\nbe delivered effectively and efficiently. However, there are cases in which \\ntechnology in education can be frustrating and annoying for both parties. \\nGovernment and university management have invested a lot of money to \\nensure that educators and students can really benefit from the technology. \\nIn spite of huge investment on educational technology tools (hardware and \\nsoftware) over the past decades in various education initiatives, the potential \\nof technology usage at university level has not reached the desired level \\namong educators and students. What is the missing link for the realisation of \\nthe expected return-of-investment? Recent researches (C Akarawang, 2015; \\nBibi, 2017; Hersh, 2014) indicate that the problem is due to the gap between \\ntechnical ICT skills and the knowledge of good pedagogical practice among \\neducators. The outcome of this study proposes an Educational Technology \\nstandard to be applied in university setting using TPCK (Technological \\nPedagogical Content Knowledge) as the basic framework. However, this \\npaper will only discuss a part of our standard development highlighting \\nthe assessment method that was used during the implementation of ETC \\n68 standard in our institutions. Overall, the descriptive result using pre and \\npost means scores as assessment method towards proposed standard shows \\nthat the educators’ acceptance score in our institutions are mostly good. \\nHowever the element within the standard least accepted are TCK (Technology \\nContent Knowledge) and TPK (Technology Pedagogical Knowledge). The \\nassessment and finding in this study nevertheless are suggested to be used \\nas a guidance for ETC Standard implementation in university setting in \\norder to stress the importance of considering technological possibilities in \\nlight of developmentally appropriate practices and specific learning goals \\nin ICT/ET training provided for educators in HEI in Malaysia. \\n  \\nKeywords: educational technology; TPCK, ICT standard, university, \\neducators, student\",\"PeriodicalId\":175901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social and Management Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social and Management Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v15i1.4232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Management Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v15i1.4232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

教育中的技术旨在帮助教育者和学生同时进行知识转移和知识获取。在许多方面,教育中的技术应该证明教育可以有效和高效地进行。然而,在某些情况下,教育中的技术可能会让双方都感到沮丧和烦恼。政府和大学管理层投入了大量资金,以确保教育工作者和学生能够真正从这项技术中受益。尽管在过去的几十年里,在各种教育活动中对教育技术工具(硬件和软件)进行了巨大的投资,但在教育工作者和学生中,大学技术使用的潜力还没有达到预期的水平。实现预期投资回报的缺失环节是什么?近期研究(C Akarawang, 2015;比比,2017;Hersh, 2014)表明,问题是由于技术ICT技能和教育工作者之间的良好教学实践知识的差距。本研究结果提出了一套以技术教学内容知识(TPCK)为基本框架的教育技术标准。然而,本文将只讨论我们标准制定的一部分,重点介绍在我们机构实施ETC 68标准期间使用的评估方法。总体而言,采用前后均值分数作为评价方法的描述性结果表明,我国院校教育工作者的接受分数大多较好。然而,标准中最不被接受的元素是TCK(技术内容知识)和TPK(技术教学知识)。然而,建议将本研究中的评估和发现作为在大学环境中实施ETC标准的指导,以强调在为马来西亚高等教育教育工作者提供的ICT/ET培训中,根据适合发展的实践和具体学习目标考虑技术可能性的重要性。关键词:教育技术;TPCK, ICT标准,大学,教育工作者,学生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment Method for Potential Educational Technology Competency Standard based on TPCK in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions
Technology in education is purposely designed to help both educators and students in knowledge transfer and knowledge gain simultaneously. In many aspects, technology in education is supposed to prove that education can be delivered effectively and efficiently. However, there are cases in which technology in education can be frustrating and annoying for both parties. Government and university management have invested a lot of money to ensure that educators and students can really benefit from the technology. In spite of huge investment on educational technology tools (hardware and software) over the past decades in various education initiatives, the potential of technology usage at university level has not reached the desired level among educators and students. What is the missing link for the realisation of the expected return-of-investment? Recent researches (C Akarawang, 2015; Bibi, 2017; Hersh, 2014) indicate that the problem is due to the gap between technical ICT skills and the knowledge of good pedagogical practice among educators. The outcome of this study proposes an Educational Technology standard to be applied in university setting using TPCK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) as the basic framework. However, this paper will only discuss a part of our standard development highlighting the assessment method that was used during the implementation of ETC 68 standard in our institutions. Overall, the descriptive result using pre and post means scores as assessment method towards proposed standard shows that the educators’ acceptance score in our institutions are mostly good. However the element within the standard least accepted are TCK (Technology Content Knowledge) and TPK (Technology Pedagogical Knowledge). The assessment and finding in this study nevertheless are suggested to be used as a guidance for ETC Standard implementation in university setting in order to stress the importance of considering technological possibilities in light of developmentally appropriate practices and specific learning goals in ICT/ET training provided for educators in HEI in Malaysia.   Keywords: educational technology; TPCK, ICT standard, university, educators, student
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信