农民权利的实质与内容——一个框架?

C. Lawson, Edwin Bikundo
{"title":"农民权利的实质与内容——一个框架?","authors":"C. Lawson, Edwin Bikundo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3457058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report proposes a framework for realising the substance and content of Farmers’ Rights. The framework involves a Hohfeldian analysis of jural relations (analytical jurisprudence) to clarify the right and avoid ambiguity in terminology and slippage and blending between different ideas – helping us in how to think and not what to think. This analytical framework will also clarify the different economic and political implications that follow from the favoured legal relationship and the way that is reflected in domestic laws. A list of rights is also identified from a review of the existing work and effort put into dealing with Farmers’ Rights both within the formal Plant Treaty forums and by institutions and individuals contributing to realising Farmers’ Rights, and existing rights instruments such as the Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas and other relevant rights instruments. By identifying the rights and then the kinds of legal (jural) relationship, future work can more reasonably set out in appropriate rights language the substance and content of Farmers’ Rights. This will, of course, require the appropriate consultations and negotiations. This report merely provides a starting point for a substantive rights discussion and an analytical framework that might be useful.","PeriodicalId":402695,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Substance and Content of Farmers’ Rights – A Framework?\",\"authors\":\"C. Lawson, Edwin Bikundo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3457058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This report proposes a framework for realising the substance and content of Farmers’ Rights. The framework involves a Hohfeldian analysis of jural relations (analytical jurisprudence) to clarify the right and avoid ambiguity in terminology and slippage and blending between different ideas – helping us in how to think and not what to think. This analytical framework will also clarify the different economic and political implications that follow from the favoured legal relationship and the way that is reflected in domestic laws. A list of rights is also identified from a review of the existing work and effort put into dealing with Farmers’ Rights both within the formal Plant Treaty forums and by institutions and individuals contributing to realising Farmers’ Rights, and existing rights instruments such as the Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas and other relevant rights instruments. By identifying the rights and then the kinds of legal (jural) relationship, future work can more reasonably set out in appropriate rights language the substance and content of Farmers’ Rights. This will, of course, require the appropriate consultations and negotiations. This report merely provides a starting point for a substantive rights discussion and an analytical framework that might be useful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3457058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3457058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本报告提出了实现农民权利实质和内容的框架。该框架包括对法律关系的Hohfeldian式分析(分析法学),以澄清权利,避免术语歧义,避免不同思想之间的滑动和混合-帮助我们如何思考,而不是思考什么。这一分析框架还将澄清有利的法律关系所产生的不同经济和政治影响以及反映在国内法中的方式。通过审查在正式植物条约论坛内以及促进实现农民权利的机构和个人为处理农民权利所做的现有工作和努力,以及《农民和农村地区其他劳动者权利宣言》等现有权利文书和其他相关权利文书,还确定了一份权利清单。通过对权利的界定,进而对法律(法律)关系的种类进行界定,可以在今后的工作中以适当的权利语言更合理地阐述农民权利的实质和内容。当然,这将需要进行适当的协商和谈判。本报告只是为实质性权利讨论和可能有用的分析框架提供了一个起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Substance and Content of Farmers’ Rights – A Framework?
This report proposes a framework for realising the substance and content of Farmers’ Rights. The framework involves a Hohfeldian analysis of jural relations (analytical jurisprudence) to clarify the right and avoid ambiguity in terminology and slippage and blending between different ideas – helping us in how to think and not what to think. This analytical framework will also clarify the different economic and political implications that follow from the favoured legal relationship and the way that is reflected in domestic laws. A list of rights is also identified from a review of the existing work and effort put into dealing with Farmers’ Rights both within the formal Plant Treaty forums and by institutions and individuals contributing to realising Farmers’ Rights, and existing rights instruments such as the Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas and other relevant rights instruments. By identifying the rights and then the kinds of legal (jural) relationship, future work can more reasonably set out in appropriate rights language the substance and content of Farmers’ Rights. This will, of course, require the appropriate consultations and negotiations. This report merely provides a starting point for a substantive rights discussion and an analytical framework that might be useful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信