自治权作为所得税实现原则的道德基础

C. Delmotte
{"title":"自治权作为所得税实现原则的道德基础","authors":"C. Delmotte","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798439.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter supplements the debate on the ideal capital gains tax through its examination of a suitable technique for assessing income. On the one hand, assets can be taxed according to the annual increase in market value (the mark-to-market approach). On the other hand, the taxation of capital can be imposed on the income that one realizes from one’ s assets-such as the monetary benefits received in exchange for a transfer of property (the realization approach). Importantly, tax scholars quasi-unanimously decry the former practice in terms of equity and efficiency. Theoretically, the (diminishing) acceptance of the taxation of realized gains is merely founded on pragmatic concerns. By delivering a deontological defense of the realization principle, this chapter establishes a possible normative foundation for this theoretically denounced practice, and supplements the debate on tax reform by suggesting the promotion of efficiency or financial redistribution in an autonomy-friendly fashion.","PeriodicalId":175866,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Political Processes","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Right to Autonomy as a Moral Foundation for the Realization Principle in Income Taxation\",\"authors\":\"C. Delmotte\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798439.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter supplements the debate on the ideal capital gains tax through its examination of a suitable technique for assessing income. On the one hand, assets can be taxed according to the annual increase in market value (the mark-to-market approach). On the other hand, the taxation of capital can be imposed on the income that one realizes from one’ s assets-such as the monetary benefits received in exchange for a transfer of property (the realization approach). Importantly, tax scholars quasi-unanimously decry the former practice in terms of equity and efficiency. Theoretically, the (diminishing) acceptance of the taxation of realized gains is merely founded on pragmatic concerns. By delivering a deontological defense of the realization principle, this chapter establishes a possible normative foundation for this theoretically denounced practice, and supplements the debate on tax reform by suggesting the promotion of efficiency or financial redistribution in an autonomy-friendly fashion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRN: Political Processes\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRN: Political Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798439.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Political Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798439.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本章通过对评估收入的合适技术的考察,补充了关于理想资本利得税的辩论。一方面,资产可以根据市场价值的年增长(按市值计价法)征税。另一方面,资本税可以对一个人从自己的资产中实现的收入征收,比如通过财产转让获得的货币利益(实现方式)。重要的是,从公平和效率的角度来看,税收学者几乎一致谴责前一种做法。从理论上讲,(逐渐减少的)接受对已实现收益征税仅仅是基于务实的考虑。通过对实现原则的义务论辩护,本章为这种理论上被谴责的做法建立了可能的规范基础,并通过建议以自主友好的方式促进效率或财政再分配来补充关于税收改革的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Right to Autonomy as a Moral Foundation for the Realization Principle in Income Taxation
This chapter supplements the debate on the ideal capital gains tax through its examination of a suitable technique for assessing income. On the one hand, assets can be taxed according to the annual increase in market value (the mark-to-market approach). On the other hand, the taxation of capital can be imposed on the income that one realizes from one’ s assets-such as the monetary benefits received in exchange for a transfer of property (the realization approach). Importantly, tax scholars quasi-unanimously decry the former practice in terms of equity and efficiency. Theoretically, the (diminishing) acceptance of the taxation of realized gains is merely founded on pragmatic concerns. By delivering a deontological defense of the realization principle, this chapter establishes a possible normative foundation for this theoretically denounced practice, and supplements the debate on tax reform by suggesting the promotion of efficiency or financial redistribution in an autonomy-friendly fashion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信