{"title":"自治权作为所得税实现原则的道德基础","authors":"C. Delmotte","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798439.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter supplements the debate on the ideal capital gains tax through its examination of a suitable technique for assessing income. On the one hand, assets can be taxed according to the annual increase in market value (the mark-to-market approach). On the other hand, the taxation of capital can be imposed on the income that one realizes from one’ s assets-such as the monetary benefits received in exchange for a transfer of property (the realization approach). Importantly, tax scholars quasi-unanimously decry the former practice in terms of equity and efficiency. Theoretically, the (diminishing) acceptance of the taxation of realized gains is merely founded on pragmatic concerns. By delivering a deontological defense of the realization principle, this chapter establishes a possible normative foundation for this theoretically denounced practice, and supplements the debate on tax reform by suggesting the promotion of efficiency or financial redistribution in an autonomy-friendly fashion.","PeriodicalId":175866,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Political Processes","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Right to Autonomy as a Moral Foundation for the Realization Principle in Income Taxation\",\"authors\":\"C. Delmotte\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798439.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter supplements the debate on the ideal capital gains tax through its examination of a suitable technique for assessing income. On the one hand, assets can be taxed according to the annual increase in market value (the mark-to-market approach). On the other hand, the taxation of capital can be imposed on the income that one realizes from one’ s assets-such as the monetary benefits received in exchange for a transfer of property (the realization approach). Importantly, tax scholars quasi-unanimously decry the former practice in terms of equity and efficiency. Theoretically, the (diminishing) acceptance of the taxation of realized gains is merely founded on pragmatic concerns. By delivering a deontological defense of the realization principle, this chapter establishes a possible normative foundation for this theoretically denounced practice, and supplements the debate on tax reform by suggesting the promotion of efficiency or financial redistribution in an autonomy-friendly fashion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRN: Political Processes\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRN: Political Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798439.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Political Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798439.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Right to Autonomy as a Moral Foundation for the Realization Principle in Income Taxation
This chapter supplements the debate on the ideal capital gains tax through its examination of a suitable technique for assessing income. On the one hand, assets can be taxed according to the annual increase in market value (the mark-to-market approach). On the other hand, the taxation of capital can be imposed on the income that one realizes from one’ s assets-such as the monetary benefits received in exchange for a transfer of property (the realization approach). Importantly, tax scholars quasi-unanimously decry the former practice in terms of equity and efficiency. Theoretically, the (diminishing) acceptance of the taxation of realized gains is merely founded on pragmatic concerns. By delivering a deontological defense of the realization principle, this chapter establishes a possible normative foundation for this theoretically denounced practice, and supplements the debate on tax reform by suggesting the promotion of efficiency or financial redistribution in an autonomy-friendly fashion.