韩国对酒精饮料征税

Raden Ajeng Cendikia Aurelie Maharani, Arjie Sukmawijaya Arpian Putra, Angela Melani Widjaja, Tyananda Agathalia Kumara
{"title":"韩国对酒精饮料征税","authors":"Raden Ajeng Cendikia Aurelie Maharani, Arjie Sukmawijaya Arpian Putra, Angela Melani Widjaja, Tyananda Agathalia Kumara","doi":"10.37899/journallabisecoman.v1i4.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to find out whether Korea violates the provisions of International trade Article III: 2 First sentence and second sentence of GATT in 1994. Soju is a traditional alcoholic beverage that is most famous in Korea has been produced in a diluted manner so that the beverage content of 25% alcoholic soju can be said that the beverage has a content that is below 20%. But people in European countries and the United States have complaints or opinions that they do not agree with the alcohol tax policy in South Korea, especially soju is considered unfair. So Korea is trying to offer a preference for taxes on soju drinks compared to certain imported western-style drinks. The research conclusions show that Soju and Imported Liquor Spirits are not substitutive products. Soju and Imported Liquor Spirits do not compete directly, seen from the fact that although there has been a decrease in the number of Soju sales in Korea since the ILS tax was lowered, the distance between Soju and ILS sales is still far away. So from the facts above, South Korea does not violate GATT Article III: 2 Second Sentence. From our explanation above, Like Products is a cumulative requirement to meet: Common Charateristics End Uses Channels of distribution Prices. From that data, South Korea does not violate GATT Article III: 2 First Sentence and Second Sentence although there are differences in tax imposition because the two products, Soju and ILS are not like products.","PeriodicalId":116609,"journal":{"name":"Journal La Bisecoman","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"South Korean Taxes on Alcoholic Beverage\",\"authors\":\"Raden Ajeng Cendikia Aurelie Maharani, Arjie Sukmawijaya Arpian Putra, Angela Melani Widjaja, Tyananda Agathalia Kumara\",\"doi\":\"10.37899/journallabisecoman.v1i4.215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to find out whether Korea violates the provisions of International trade Article III: 2 First sentence and second sentence of GATT in 1994. Soju is a traditional alcoholic beverage that is most famous in Korea has been produced in a diluted manner so that the beverage content of 25% alcoholic soju can be said that the beverage has a content that is below 20%. But people in European countries and the United States have complaints or opinions that they do not agree with the alcohol tax policy in South Korea, especially soju is considered unfair. So Korea is trying to offer a preference for taxes on soju drinks compared to certain imported western-style drinks. The research conclusions show that Soju and Imported Liquor Spirits are not substitutive products. Soju and Imported Liquor Spirits do not compete directly, seen from the fact that although there has been a decrease in the number of Soju sales in Korea since the ILS tax was lowered, the distance between Soju and ILS sales is still far away. So from the facts above, South Korea does not violate GATT Article III: 2 Second Sentence. From our explanation above, Like Products is a cumulative requirement to meet: Common Charateristics End Uses Channels of distribution Prices. From that data, South Korea does not violate GATT Article III: 2 First Sentence and Second Sentence although there are differences in tax imposition because the two products, Soju and ILS are not like products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal La Bisecoman\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal La Bisecoman\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37899/journallabisecoman.v1i4.215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal La Bisecoman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37899/journallabisecoman.v1i4.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在查明韩国在1994年是否违反了关贸总协定国际贸易第III: 2条第一句和第二句的规定。烧酒是韩国最著名的传统酒精饮料,它是通过稀释的方式生产的,因此酒精含量为25%的烧酒可以说是酒精含量低于20%的饮料。但是欧洲国家和美国的人们有抱怨或意见,他们不同意韩国的酒精税政策,特别是烧酒被认为是不公平的。因此,与进口的某些西式饮料相比,韩国正试图对烧酒提供税收优惠。研究结果表明,烧酒和进口白酒不是替代产品。烧酒和进口白酒之间并不存在直接的竞争关系。因此,虽然在下调ILS税后,国内的烧酒销量有所减少,但两者之间的差距仍然很大。因此,从以上事实来看,韩国并没有违反关贸总协定第三条第二句。从我们上面的解释来看,Like Products是一个需要满足的累积要求:共同特征最终用途分销渠道价格。从这些数据来看,韩国没有违反GATT第3条第2款第一句和第二句,尽管由于烧酒和ILS这两种产品不是产品,在征税方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
South Korean Taxes on Alcoholic Beverage
This research aims to find out whether Korea violates the provisions of International trade Article III: 2 First sentence and second sentence of GATT in 1994. Soju is a traditional alcoholic beverage that is most famous in Korea has been produced in a diluted manner so that the beverage content of 25% alcoholic soju can be said that the beverage has a content that is below 20%. But people in European countries and the United States have complaints or opinions that they do not agree with the alcohol tax policy in South Korea, especially soju is considered unfair. So Korea is trying to offer a preference for taxes on soju drinks compared to certain imported western-style drinks. The research conclusions show that Soju and Imported Liquor Spirits are not substitutive products. Soju and Imported Liquor Spirits do not compete directly, seen from the fact that although there has been a decrease in the number of Soju sales in Korea since the ILS tax was lowered, the distance between Soju and ILS sales is still far away. So from the facts above, South Korea does not violate GATT Article III: 2 Second Sentence. From our explanation above, Like Products is a cumulative requirement to meet: Common Charateristics End Uses Channels of distribution Prices. From that data, South Korea does not violate GATT Article III: 2 First Sentence and Second Sentence although there are differences in tax imposition because the two products, Soju and ILS are not like products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信