运动学自行车模型:自动驾驶汽车可行轨迹规划的一致模型?

Philip Polack, Florent Altché, B. d'Andréa-Novel, A. D. L. Fortelle
{"title":"运动学自行车模型:自动驾驶汽车可行轨迹规划的一致模型?","authors":"Philip Polack, Florent Altché, B. d'Andréa-Novel, A. D. L. Fortelle","doi":"10.1109/IVS.2017.7995816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most autonomous driving architectures separate planning and control phases in different layers, even though both problems are intrinsically related. Due to limitations on the available computational power, their levels of abstraction and modeling differ; in particular, vehicle dynamics are often highly simplified at the planning phase, which may lead to inconsistency between the two layers. In this paper, we study the kinematic bicycle model, which is often used for trajectory planning, and compare its results to a 9 degrees of freedom model. Modeling errors and limitations of the kinematic bicycle model are highlighted. Lastly, this paper proposes a simple and efficient consistency criterion in order to validate the use of this model for planning purposes.","PeriodicalId":143367,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"239","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The kinematic bicycle model: A consistent model for planning feasible trajectories for autonomous vehicles?\",\"authors\":\"Philip Polack, Florent Altché, B. d'Andréa-Novel, A. D. L. Fortelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IVS.2017.7995816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most autonomous driving architectures separate planning and control phases in different layers, even though both problems are intrinsically related. Due to limitations on the available computational power, their levels of abstraction and modeling differ; in particular, vehicle dynamics are often highly simplified at the planning phase, which may lead to inconsistency between the two layers. In this paper, we study the kinematic bicycle model, which is often used for trajectory planning, and compare its results to a 9 degrees of freedom model. Modeling errors and limitations of the kinematic bicycle model are highlighted. Lastly, this paper proposes a simple and efficient consistency criterion in order to validate the use of this model for planning purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"239\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 239

摘要

大多数自动驾驶架构将规划和控制阶段划分在不同的层,尽管这两个问题本质上是相关的。由于可用计算能力的限制,它们的抽象和建模水平不同;特别是,车辆动力学通常在规划阶段被高度简化,这可能导致两层之间的不一致。本文研究了常用于轨道规划的自行车运动学模型,并将其结果与9自由度模型进行了比较。强调了自行车运动学模型的建模误差和局限性。最后,本文提出了一个简单有效的一致性准则,以验证该模型在规划目的中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The kinematic bicycle model: A consistent model for planning feasible trajectories for autonomous vehicles?
Most autonomous driving architectures separate planning and control phases in different layers, even though both problems are intrinsically related. Due to limitations on the available computational power, their levels of abstraction and modeling differ; in particular, vehicle dynamics are often highly simplified at the planning phase, which may lead to inconsistency between the two layers. In this paper, we study the kinematic bicycle model, which is often used for trajectory planning, and compare its results to a 9 degrees of freedom model. Modeling errors and limitations of the kinematic bicycle model are highlighted. Lastly, this paper proposes a simple and efficient consistency criterion in order to validate the use of this model for planning purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信