气动声学优化模拟研究成果

G. Wilke
{"title":"气动声学优化模拟研究成果","authors":"G. Wilke","doi":"10.4050/f-0076-2020-16495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The methods of the aero-acoustic optimization toolchain developed by DLR within the VicToria project are further analyzed. From previous investigations, it was settled that an unsteady panel code with a free-wake model poses a fast alternative to higher-order CFD simulations to predict blade-vortex interaction noise. In this paper, a brief validation of both methods against the HART II rotor is done. Design parametric studies with UPM are carried out for which single CFD simulations are placed to examine the correlation between both methods. In the end, an optimization with the panel code as well as CFD is conducted to see how good the final designs match. From this research it is observed that UPM captures plausible trends when altering the chord distribution. The blade sweep may be optimized with caution when using UPM. However, for the optimization of an-/dihedral, UPM predicts a very different trend than CFD. The final designs retrieved by UPM or CFD contradicted each other when optimizing with all five parameters. The reason for this mostly lies in the determination of the strength of the rolled-up tip vortex and partially its location.\n","PeriodicalId":293921,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 76th Annual Forum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Findings in Aero-Acoustic Simulations for Optimizations\",\"authors\":\"G. Wilke\",\"doi\":\"10.4050/f-0076-2020-16495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The methods of the aero-acoustic optimization toolchain developed by DLR within the VicToria project are further analyzed. From previous investigations, it was settled that an unsteady panel code with a free-wake model poses a fast alternative to higher-order CFD simulations to predict blade-vortex interaction noise. In this paper, a brief validation of both methods against the HART II rotor is done. Design parametric studies with UPM are carried out for which single CFD simulations are placed to examine the correlation between both methods. In the end, an optimization with the panel code as well as CFD is conducted to see how good the final designs match. From this research it is observed that UPM captures plausible trends when altering the chord distribution. The blade sweep may be optimized with caution when using UPM. However, for the optimization of an-/dihedral, UPM predicts a very different trend than CFD. The final designs retrieved by UPM or CFD contradicted each other when optimizing with all five parameters. The reason for this mostly lies in the determination of the strength of the rolled-up tip vortex and partially its location.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":293921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 76th Annual Forum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 76th Annual Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0076-2020-16495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 76th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0076-2020-16495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

进一步分析了DLR在维多利亚项目中开发的气动声学优化工具链的方法。从之前的研究中可以得出结论,采用自由尾迹模型的非定常面板代码可以快速替代高阶CFD模拟来预测叶片-涡相互作用噪声。本文对这两种方法在HART II转子上进行了简要验证。采用UPM进行了设计参数研究,并进行了单CFD模拟,以检验两种方法之间的相关性。最后,对面板代码和CFD进行了优化,以查看最终设计的匹配程度。从这项研究中可以观察到,UPM在改变和弦分布时捕捉到似是而非的趋势。使用UPM时,应谨慎优化叶片扫描。然而,对于an-/二面体的优化,UPM预测的趋势与CFD截然不同。UPM和CFD得到的最终设计结果在5个参数下进行优化时相互矛盾。究其原因,主要在于旋顶涡强度的确定,部分在于旋顶涡位置的确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Findings in Aero-Acoustic Simulations for Optimizations
The methods of the aero-acoustic optimization toolchain developed by DLR within the VicToria project are further analyzed. From previous investigations, it was settled that an unsteady panel code with a free-wake model poses a fast alternative to higher-order CFD simulations to predict blade-vortex interaction noise. In this paper, a brief validation of both methods against the HART II rotor is done. Design parametric studies with UPM are carried out for which single CFD simulations are placed to examine the correlation between both methods. In the end, an optimization with the panel code as well as CFD is conducted to see how good the final designs match. From this research it is observed that UPM captures plausible trends when altering the chord distribution. The blade sweep may be optimized with caution when using UPM. However, for the optimization of an-/dihedral, UPM predicts a very different trend than CFD. The final designs retrieved by UPM or CFD contradicted each other when optimizing with all five parameters. The reason for this mostly lies in the determination of the strength of the rolled-up tip vortex and partially its location.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信