沙克拉大学工程教育的理论与应用

Abdulaziz S. Alsayyari, Ahmed A. A. Hafez
{"title":"沙克拉大学工程教育的理论与应用","authors":"Abdulaziz S. Alsayyari, Ahmed A. A. Hafez","doi":"10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the prominent issues of quality accreditation in academia is evaluation and assessment of the graduates for the conducted education. This evaluation acts as rudder modulator to regulate the gap between field/industry anticipations and the available education. This article introduces statistical analysis for the evaluation and assessment of graduate engineers in civil, mechanical and electrical engineering areas for the quality of education conducted in Shaqra University. A cross sectional study for around 63% of engineering college graduates that practicing engineering work is carried out. A comprehensive and concise questionnaire has been designed to measure the objectives of the study. The study is aimed basically to determine the gap between the theory and application. The quality of conducted education was assessed by the investigation of the effectiveness of elective courses, laboratory courses, graduation projects, industrial training, and English language courses. Yet, the results show that around 70% of the graduates find a significant compatibility between the conducted education and the field, and only 21% of them claim that a reasonable compatibility between their education and industry exist.","PeriodicalId":202625,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engineering education in Shaqra University between theory and application\",\"authors\":\"Abdulaziz S. Alsayyari, Ahmed A. A. Hafez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the prominent issues of quality accreditation in academia is evaluation and assessment of the graduates for the conducted education. This evaluation acts as rudder modulator to regulate the gap between field/industry anticipations and the available education. This article introduces statistical analysis for the evaluation and assessment of graduate engineers in civil, mechanical and electrical engineering areas for the quality of education conducted in Shaqra University. A cross sectional study for around 63% of engineering college graduates that practicing engineering work is carried out. A comprehensive and concise questionnaire has been designed to measure the objectives of the study. The study is aimed basically to determine the gap between the theory and application. The quality of conducted education was assessed by the investigation of the effectiveness of elective courses, laboratory courses, graduation projects, industrial training, and English language courses. Yet, the results show that around 70% of the graduates find a significant compatibility between the conducted education and the field, and only 21% of them claim that a reasonable compatibility between their education and industry exist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

学术质量认证的一个突出问题是对实施教育的毕业生进行评价和评估。这种评估就像舵调制器,调节领域/行业预期与现有教育之间的差距。本文介绍了沙克拉大学土木、机电工程专业研究生教育质量评价与考核的统计分析方法。一项针对大约63%的工程学院毕业生进行的横断面研究表明,他们从事工程工作。设计了一份全面而简明的问卷来衡量研究的目标。研究的基本目的是确定理论与应用之间的差距。通过对选修课程、实验课程、毕业设计、产业培训和英语语言课程的有效性调查来评估实施教育的质量。然而,结果显示,大约70%的毕业生认为所接受的教育与所从事的领域之间存在显著的兼容性,只有21%的毕业生认为他们的教育与所从事的行业之间存在合理的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engineering education in Shaqra University between theory and application
One of the prominent issues of quality accreditation in academia is evaluation and assessment of the graduates for the conducted education. This evaluation acts as rudder modulator to regulate the gap between field/industry anticipations and the available education. This article introduces statistical analysis for the evaluation and assessment of graduate engineers in civil, mechanical and electrical engineering areas for the quality of education conducted in Shaqra University. A cross sectional study for around 63% of engineering college graduates that practicing engineering work is carried out. A comprehensive and concise questionnaire has been designed to measure the objectives of the study. The study is aimed basically to determine the gap between the theory and application. The quality of conducted education was assessed by the investigation of the effectiveness of elective courses, laboratory courses, graduation projects, industrial training, and English language courses. Yet, the results show that around 70% of the graduates find a significant compatibility between the conducted education and the field, and only 21% of them claim that a reasonable compatibility between their education and industry exist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信