{"title":"新冠肺炎期间私立(综合)医学院与公立(传统课程)医学院基础健康科学学习环境比较","authors":"","doi":"10.36283/pjmd11-1/016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\nBackground: Educational environment (EE) plays a pivotal role in the academic growth of a medical student. The objective of the study was to compare the perception of a learning environment in Basic Health Sciences by first and second-year MBBS students of private and public medical colleges in Lahore, Pakistan during Covid-19 using a questionnaire. \n\nMethods: Data was collected from students (146) through a self-reported questionnaire via Google. dox after obtaining consent. A total score between 151 and 200 was considered excellent. A score between 101 and 150 indicated a positive approach while less than 100 was considered problematic. A score >3.5 for individual items indicate the presence of the specific aspect of the educational environment, whereas, <3 score requires attention. The t-test was used for analysis and p<0.05 was considered significant.\n\nResults: Out of 146 students 84(51.21%) were from private medical colleges while 62(42.46%) were from public medical colleges. The students of private medical colleges who follow the integrated curriculum found the learning sessions (27.84±7.40) were more student-centered with supporting online classes (2.75 ± 1.01) (p<0.05). Multiple softwares found that the tutorial sessions improved their problem-solving skills (>2.5). Teachers were helpful in stress management during the pandemic (>3). Proper counselors were employed by the private medical schools to cater to the needs of students who required assistance. \n\nConclusion: A significantly high mean score was obtained from private-sector medical students regarding students’ perception of learning (SPL), students’ perception of teachers (SPT), and students’ academic self-perception (SASP), compared to public medical colleges. \nKeywords: Learning Environment; Questionnaire; Medical Students; Perception; Integrated.","PeriodicalId":231166,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Environment of Basic Health Sciences in Private (Integrated) versus Public (Traditional Curriculum) Medical Schools during COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.36283/pjmd11-1/016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\nBackground: Educational environment (EE) plays a pivotal role in the academic growth of a medical student. The objective of the study was to compare the perception of a learning environment in Basic Health Sciences by first and second-year MBBS students of private and public medical colleges in Lahore, Pakistan during Covid-19 using a questionnaire. \\n\\nMethods: Data was collected from students (146) through a self-reported questionnaire via Google. dox after obtaining consent. A total score between 151 and 200 was considered excellent. A score between 101 and 150 indicated a positive approach while less than 100 was considered problematic. A score >3.5 for individual items indicate the presence of the specific aspect of the educational environment, whereas, <3 score requires attention. The t-test was used for analysis and p<0.05 was considered significant.\\n\\nResults: Out of 146 students 84(51.21%) were from private medical colleges while 62(42.46%) were from public medical colleges. The students of private medical colleges who follow the integrated curriculum found the learning sessions (27.84±7.40) were more student-centered with supporting online classes (2.75 ± 1.01) (p<0.05). Multiple softwares found that the tutorial sessions improved their problem-solving skills (>2.5). Teachers were helpful in stress management during the pandemic (>3). Proper counselors were employed by the private medical schools to cater to the needs of students who required assistance. \\n\\nConclusion: A significantly high mean score was obtained from private-sector medical students regarding students’ perception of learning (SPL), students’ perception of teachers (SPT), and students’ academic self-perception (SASP), compared to public medical colleges. \\nKeywords: Learning Environment; Questionnaire; Medical Students; Perception; Integrated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36283/pjmd11-1/016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36283/pjmd11-1/016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Learning Environment of Basic Health Sciences in Private (Integrated) versus Public (Traditional Curriculum) Medical Schools during COVID-19
ABSTRACT
Background: Educational environment (EE) plays a pivotal role in the academic growth of a medical student. The objective of the study was to compare the perception of a learning environment in Basic Health Sciences by first and second-year MBBS students of private and public medical colleges in Lahore, Pakistan during Covid-19 using a questionnaire.
Methods: Data was collected from students (146) through a self-reported questionnaire via Google. dox after obtaining consent. A total score between 151 and 200 was considered excellent. A score between 101 and 150 indicated a positive approach while less than 100 was considered problematic. A score >3.5 for individual items indicate the presence of the specific aspect of the educational environment, whereas, <3 score requires attention. The t-test was used for analysis and p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Out of 146 students 84(51.21%) were from private medical colleges while 62(42.46%) were from public medical colleges. The students of private medical colleges who follow the integrated curriculum found the learning sessions (27.84±7.40) were more student-centered with supporting online classes (2.75 ± 1.01) (p<0.05). Multiple softwares found that the tutorial sessions improved their problem-solving skills (>2.5). Teachers were helpful in stress management during the pandemic (>3). Proper counselors were employed by the private medical schools to cater to the needs of students who required assistance.
Conclusion: A significantly high mean score was obtained from private-sector medical students regarding students’ perception of learning (SPL), students’ perception of teachers (SPT), and students’ academic self-perception (SASP), compared to public medical colleges.
Keywords: Learning Environment; Questionnaire; Medical Students; Perception; Integrated.