超越光环:对话代理自动驾驶中信任和功能特异性的研究

Anton Torggler, Justin Edwards, Philipp Wintersberger
{"title":"超越光环:对话代理自动驾驶中信任和功能特异性的研究","authors":"Anton Torggler, Justin Edwards, Philipp Wintersberger","doi":"10.1145/3543174.3546834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Only a few works so far have addressed functional specificity for trust formation in automated driving. Previous research indicated that drivers could hardly distinguish between sub-systems, while their trust is influenced by other in-vehicle technologies. Thus, we conducted a user study where participants had to supervise a level 2 vehicle while reading and communicating with conversational agents. In two conditions, the vehicle was either represented by a single agent or by two agents that portrayed the driving automation and the infotainment system. We hypothesized that a clear differentiation between sub-systems could allow drivers to better calibrate their trust. However, our results show quite the opposite. Correlation analyses suggest that participants’ functional specificity was high, and they based their situational and general trust ratings mainly on the perception of the driving system. Also, dispositional trust did not influence trust formation, but many participants still failed to monitor the system appropriately.","PeriodicalId":284749,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Halo: Investigation of Trust and Functional Specificity in Automated Driving with Conversational Agents\",\"authors\":\"Anton Torggler, Justin Edwards, Philipp Wintersberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3543174.3546834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Only a few works so far have addressed functional specificity for trust formation in automated driving. Previous research indicated that drivers could hardly distinguish between sub-systems, while their trust is influenced by other in-vehicle technologies. Thus, we conducted a user study where participants had to supervise a level 2 vehicle while reading and communicating with conversational agents. In two conditions, the vehicle was either represented by a single agent or by two agents that portrayed the driving automation and the infotainment system. We hypothesized that a clear differentiation between sub-systems could allow drivers to better calibrate their trust. However, our results show quite the opposite. Correlation analyses suggest that participants’ functional specificity was high, and they based their situational and general trust ratings mainly on the perception of the driving system. Also, dispositional trust did not influence trust formation, but many participants still failed to monitor the system appropriately.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

到目前为止,只有很少的工作涉及自动驾驶中信任形成的功能特异性。先前的研究表明,驾驶员很难区分子系统,而他们的信任受到其他车载技术的影响。因此,我们进行了一项用户研究,参与者必须在阅读和与会话代理交流的同时监督2级车辆。在两种情况下,车辆要么由单个代理代表,要么由两个代理代表驾驶自动化和信息娱乐系统。我们假设,子系统之间的明确区分可以让司机更好地校准他们的信任。然而,我们的结果却恰恰相反。相关分析表明,参与者的功能特异性较高,他们主要基于对驾驶系统的感知来评价他们的情景信任和总体信任。此外,配置信任并不影响信任的形成,但许多参与者仍然未能适当地监控系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the Halo: Investigation of Trust and Functional Specificity in Automated Driving with Conversational Agents
Only a few works so far have addressed functional specificity for trust formation in automated driving. Previous research indicated that drivers could hardly distinguish between sub-systems, while their trust is influenced by other in-vehicle technologies. Thus, we conducted a user study where participants had to supervise a level 2 vehicle while reading and communicating with conversational agents. In two conditions, the vehicle was either represented by a single agent or by two agents that portrayed the driving automation and the infotainment system. We hypothesized that a clear differentiation between sub-systems could allow drivers to better calibrate their trust. However, our results show quite the opposite. Correlation analyses suggest that participants’ functional specificity was high, and they based their situational and general trust ratings mainly on the perception of the driving system. Also, dispositional trust did not influence trust formation, but many participants still failed to monitor the system appropriately.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信