从印度尼西亚的法律角度看大麻作为药物的利用

A. Ningtias, Alfredo Risano
{"title":"从印度尼西亚的法律角度看大麻作为药物的利用","authors":"A. Ningtias, Alfredo Risano","doi":"10.30736/ji.v10i1.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe main problem in this research is that there is a conflict in Article 7 and Article 8. Where Article 8 Prohibition of the Use of Narcotics Group 1 for the Purpose of Health Services, while in Article 7 Narcotics can be used for the benefit of health services. Articles in the Narcotics Law currently conflict with other articles, causing many interpretations and legal uncertainty in the enforcement of the use of cannabis plants as medicine in society. The Use of Cannabis as a Drug Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Law. It can be concluded in the Indonesian Criminal Law research on the Use of Cannabis as a Drug, currently many articles related to Narcotics are still in conflict with other articles, causing uncertainty in the law against the use of marijuana as a drug. The state must be able to codify the Law on Narcotics, so that these articles do not conflict with other articles, and so that there are no more losses experienced by the community and the state in the war on drugs. Whereas in Islamic Criminal Law it refers to the Qur'an and Hadith as well as the ijtihad of scholars. Cannabis plants can be used as long as it is intended for medicinal purposes, and provides punishment in the form of ta'zir against all forms of abuse. Whereas in ijtihad scholars through the qiyas method which equates cannabis plants with khamr, it does not meet the qiyas element, where in equating it with khamr which is clearly different in terms of content, substance, or the resulting effect. So that qiyas equating marijuana with khamr cannot determine the prohibition of cannabis plants as medicine. Whereas in the maslahah al-mursalah method, as long as the use of marijuana as a drug is regulated in its use so that it gets benefits, the use of marijuana as a halal drug is used, because it is already a rule of use as a drug against experts.","PeriodicalId":352951,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Independent","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UTILIZATION OF CANANA AS A MEDICINE IN LEGAL PERSPECTIVE IN INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"A. Ningtias, Alfredo Risano\",\"doi\":\"10.30736/ji.v10i1.159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe main problem in this research is that there is a conflict in Article 7 and Article 8. Where Article 8 Prohibition of the Use of Narcotics Group 1 for the Purpose of Health Services, while in Article 7 Narcotics can be used for the benefit of health services. Articles in the Narcotics Law currently conflict with other articles, causing many interpretations and legal uncertainty in the enforcement of the use of cannabis plants as medicine in society. The Use of Cannabis as a Drug Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Law. It can be concluded in the Indonesian Criminal Law research on the Use of Cannabis as a Drug, currently many articles related to Narcotics are still in conflict with other articles, causing uncertainty in the law against the use of marijuana as a drug. The state must be able to codify the Law on Narcotics, so that these articles do not conflict with other articles, and so that there are no more losses experienced by the community and the state in the war on drugs. Whereas in Islamic Criminal Law it refers to the Qur'an and Hadith as well as the ijtihad of scholars. Cannabis plants can be used as long as it is intended for medicinal purposes, and provides punishment in the form of ta'zir against all forms of abuse. Whereas in ijtihad scholars through the qiyas method which equates cannabis plants with khamr, it does not meet the qiyas element, where in equating it with khamr which is clearly different in terms of content, substance, or the resulting effect. So that qiyas equating marijuana with khamr cannot determine the prohibition of cannabis plants as medicine. Whereas in the maslahah al-mursalah method, as long as the use of marijuana as a drug is regulated in its use so that it gets benefits, the use of marijuana as a halal drug is used, because it is already a rule of use as a drug against experts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Independent\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Independent\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v10i1.159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Independent","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v10i1.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究的主要问题是第七条与第八条存在冲突。第8条禁止为保健服务目的使用麻醉品第1组,而第7条麻醉品可为保健服务目的使用。《麻醉品法》的条款目前与其他条款相冲突,在社会上强制使用大麻植物作为药物方面造成许多解释和法律上的不确定性。从印尼刑法和伊斯兰教法的角度看大麻的毒品使用。在《印度尼西亚刑法关于大麻作为毒品使用的研究》中可以得出结论,目前与麻醉品有关的许多条款仍然与其他条款相冲突,导致大麻作为毒品使用的法律存在不确定性。国家必须能够编纂《麻醉品法》,使这些条款不与其他条款相冲突,使社区和国家在禁毒战争中不再遭受损失。而在伊斯兰刑法中,它指的是古兰经和圣训以及学者们的圣训。只要大麻植物是用于医疗目的,就可以使用,并对一切形式的滥用规定了塔齐尔形式的惩罚。然而,在伊智提哈德学者通过qiyas方法将大麻植物等同于khamr,它不符合qiyas元素,因为将其等同于khamr在内容,物质或结果效果方面明显不同。因此,qiyas将大麻等同于khamr并不能决定禁止大麻植物作为药物。而在maslahah al-mursalah方法中,只要大麻作为一种药物的使用受到监管,这样它就能得到好处,大麻作为一种清真药物的使用就会被使用,因为它已经是一种针对专家的药物使用规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
UTILIZATION OF CANANA AS A MEDICINE IN LEGAL PERSPECTIVE IN INDONESIA
AbstractThe main problem in this research is that there is a conflict in Article 7 and Article 8. Where Article 8 Prohibition of the Use of Narcotics Group 1 for the Purpose of Health Services, while in Article 7 Narcotics can be used for the benefit of health services. Articles in the Narcotics Law currently conflict with other articles, causing many interpretations and legal uncertainty in the enforcement of the use of cannabis plants as medicine in society. The Use of Cannabis as a Drug Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Law. It can be concluded in the Indonesian Criminal Law research on the Use of Cannabis as a Drug, currently many articles related to Narcotics are still in conflict with other articles, causing uncertainty in the law against the use of marijuana as a drug. The state must be able to codify the Law on Narcotics, so that these articles do not conflict with other articles, and so that there are no more losses experienced by the community and the state in the war on drugs. Whereas in Islamic Criminal Law it refers to the Qur'an and Hadith as well as the ijtihad of scholars. Cannabis plants can be used as long as it is intended for medicinal purposes, and provides punishment in the form of ta'zir against all forms of abuse. Whereas in ijtihad scholars through the qiyas method which equates cannabis plants with khamr, it does not meet the qiyas element, where in equating it with khamr which is clearly different in terms of content, substance, or the resulting effect. So that qiyas equating marijuana with khamr cannot determine the prohibition of cannabis plants as medicine. Whereas in the maslahah al-mursalah method, as long as the use of marijuana as a drug is regulated in its use so that it gets benefits, the use of marijuana as a halal drug is used, because it is already a rule of use as a drug against experts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信