既非真相也非和解:后社会主义蒙古的政治暴力与记忆的独特性

Christopher Kaplonski
{"title":"既非真相也非和解:后社会主义蒙古的政治暴力与记忆的独特性","authors":"Christopher Kaplonski","doi":"10.1080/14690760802094941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores the forms of memory of political violence in post‐socialist Mongolia. In particular, I examine why Mongolia has not established a truth and reconciliation commission, pursued a policy of lustration or followed any of the other paths often taken after an episode of political violence or repression. I argue that Mongolia has not done so largely as a result of a particular emphasis on personal memory in the form of ‘singularities’. This emphasis has helped preclude the enveloping of personal accounts into larger social or political narratives, which are often seen as necessary for ‘coming to terms with the past’. I close by examining some of the broader implications of the Mongolian case for our understanding of the legacy of political violence.","PeriodicalId":440652,"journal":{"name":"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neither Truth nor Reconciliation: Political Violence and the Singularity of Memory in Post‐socialist Mongolia 1\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Kaplonski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14690760802094941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper explores the forms of memory of political violence in post‐socialist Mongolia. In particular, I examine why Mongolia has not established a truth and reconciliation commission, pursued a policy of lustration or followed any of the other paths often taken after an episode of political violence or repression. I argue that Mongolia has not done so largely as a result of a particular emphasis on personal memory in the form of ‘singularities’. This emphasis has helped preclude the enveloping of personal accounts into larger social or political narratives, which are often seen as necessary for ‘coming to terms with the past’. I close by examining some of the broader implications of the Mongolian case for our understanding of the legacy of political violence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760802094941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760802094941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

摘要本文探讨后社会主义蒙古政治暴力记忆的形式。我特别研究了为什么蒙古没有建立一个真相与和解委员会,没有推行一项光明政策,也没有遵循政治暴力或镇压事件后经常采取的任何其他道路。我认为蒙古之所以没有做到这一点,很大程度上是因为它特别强调以“奇点”的形式出现的个人记忆。这种强调有助于避免将个人叙述包裹在更大的社会或政治叙述中,这通常被视为“与过去达成协议”的必要条件。最后,我考察了蒙古事件对我们理解政治暴力遗留问题的一些更广泛的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neither Truth nor Reconciliation: Political Violence and the Singularity of Memory in Post‐socialist Mongolia 1
Abstract This paper explores the forms of memory of political violence in post‐socialist Mongolia. In particular, I examine why Mongolia has not established a truth and reconciliation commission, pursued a policy of lustration or followed any of the other paths often taken after an episode of political violence or repression. I argue that Mongolia has not done so largely as a result of a particular emphasis on personal memory in the form of ‘singularities’. This emphasis has helped preclude the enveloping of personal accounts into larger social or political narratives, which are often seen as necessary for ‘coming to terms with the past’. I close by examining some of the broader implications of the Mongolian case for our understanding of the legacy of political violence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信