欧盟扩大后自由流动的本质反思:它还遵循原来的逻辑吗?

O. Farkas
{"title":"欧盟扩大后自由流动的本质反思:它还遵循原来的逻辑吗?","authors":"O. Farkas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3736589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the wider framework of free movement of people in EU law, bridging various research fields. In doing so the initial part of the paper indicates the major differences between free movement of people before and after the Eastern Enlargement both in numbers and characteristics. This part is followed by the analysis of the effects produced in sending and in destination countries. Subsequently the focus moves on the possible reasons motivating migration and on how these decisions are facilitated by the current regulatory framework of free movement. It will be shortly recalled that free movement has been object of a constitutional evolution towards a fundamental right including all Union citizens, not only labour force. In this context free movement effectively accommodated a diversified set of reasons and motivations to exercise this right. The conclusions suggest that until cohesion remains limited, the persisting gaps in working and living standards among the Members States will continue to distort free movement.","PeriodicalId":284417,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior: Race","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Reflection on the Nature of Free Movement in An Enlarged EU: Does It Still Follow the Original Logic?\",\"authors\":\"O. Farkas\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3736589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper discusses the wider framework of free movement of people in EU law, bridging various research fields. In doing so the initial part of the paper indicates the major differences between free movement of people before and after the Eastern Enlargement both in numbers and characteristics. This part is followed by the analysis of the effects produced in sending and in destination countries. Subsequently the focus moves on the possible reasons motivating migration and on how these decisions are facilitated by the current regulatory framework of free movement. It will be shortly recalled that free movement has been object of a constitutional evolution towards a fundamental right including all Union citizens, not only labour force. In this context free movement effectively accommodated a diversified set of reasons and motivations to exercise this right. The conclusions suggest that until cohesion remains limited, the persisting gaps in working and living standards among the Members States will continue to distort free movement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Behavior: Race\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Behavior: Race\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3736589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior: Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3736589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了欧盟法律中人员自由流动的更广泛框架,弥合了各种研究领域。在这样做的过程中,文件的开头部分指出了东扩前后人员自由流动在数量和特征上的主要差异。这一部分接着分析了在原籍国和目的地国产生的影响。随后,重点转向推动移民的可能原因,以及当前自由流动的监管框架如何促进这些决定。我们将很快回顾,自由流动是朝着包括所有联盟公民,而不仅仅是劳动力在内的一项基本权利的宪法演变的目标。在这种情况下,自由流动有效地容纳了行使这一权利的各种理由和动机。结论表明,在凝聚力仍然有限之前,会员国之间工作和生活水平的持续差距将继续扭曲自由流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Reflection on the Nature of Free Movement in An Enlarged EU: Does It Still Follow the Original Logic?
The paper discusses the wider framework of free movement of people in EU law, bridging various research fields. In doing so the initial part of the paper indicates the major differences between free movement of people before and after the Eastern Enlargement both in numbers and characteristics. This part is followed by the analysis of the effects produced in sending and in destination countries. Subsequently the focus moves on the possible reasons motivating migration and on how these decisions are facilitated by the current regulatory framework of free movement. It will be shortly recalled that free movement has been object of a constitutional evolution towards a fundamental right including all Union citizens, not only labour force. In this context free movement effectively accommodated a diversified set of reasons and motivations to exercise this right. The conclusions suggest that until cohesion remains limited, the persisting gaps in working and living standards among the Members States will continue to distort free movement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信