CDS信用事件拍卖

Sudip Gupta, R. Sundaram
{"title":"CDS信用事件拍卖","authors":"Sudip Gupta, R. Sundaram","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2023243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit-event auctions were introduced in 2005 to facilitate cash settlement in the credit default swap market following a credit event. They have a novel two-stage structure that makes them distinct from other auction forms. This paper studies outcomes in credit-event auctions over the period 2008-10.Our analysis is in three parts. In the first part, we look at the efficacy of price discovery in the auction. We find that the auction price has a significant bias relative to the pre- and post-auction market prices for the same instruments, and that volatility of market prices often increases after the auction; nonetheless, we find that information generated in the auction has considerable impact on post-auction market prices. In the second part of the analysis, we look at behavior within and across auctions and the factors that influence it. We find, among other things, that “winner’s curse” concerns play a central role, affecting liquidity provision in the auction, the pricing bias, and bidders’ within-auction updating of their private information based on information revealed in the auction’s first stage. In the final part of the paper, under some simplifying assumptions, we carry out a structural estimation to recover the underlying distribution of signals. Using these estimates, we find that the alternative auction formats could reduce the amount of bias in the auction final price.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CDS Credit-Event Auctions\",\"authors\":\"Sudip Gupta, R. Sundaram\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2023243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Credit-event auctions were introduced in 2005 to facilitate cash settlement in the credit default swap market following a credit event. They have a novel two-stage structure that makes them distinct from other auction forms. This paper studies outcomes in credit-event auctions over the period 2008-10.Our analysis is in three parts. In the first part, we look at the efficacy of price discovery in the auction. We find that the auction price has a significant bias relative to the pre- and post-auction market prices for the same instruments, and that volatility of market prices often increases after the auction; nonetheless, we find that information generated in the auction has considerable impact on post-auction market prices. In the second part of the analysis, we look at behavior within and across auctions and the factors that influence it. We find, among other things, that “winner’s curse” concerns play a central role, affecting liquidity provision in the auction, the pricing bias, and bidders’ within-auction updating of their private information based on information revealed in the auction’s first stage. In the final part of the paper, under some simplifying assumptions, we carry out a structural estimation to recover the underlying distribution of signals. Using these estimates, we find that the alternative auction formats could reduce the amount of bias in the auction final price.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2023243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2023243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

信用事件拍卖于2005年推出,目的是在信用事件发生后促进信用违约掉期市场的现金结算。它们有一种新颖的两阶段结构,这使它们与其他拍卖形式不同。本文研究了2008- 2010年间信用事件拍卖的结果。我们的分析分为三个部分。在第一部分中,我们考察了价格发现在拍卖中的有效性。我们发现,同一工具的拍卖价格相对于拍卖前和拍卖后的市场价格存在显著偏差,拍卖后市场价格的波动性往往会增加;尽管如此,我们发现拍卖中产生的信息对拍卖后的市场价格有相当大的影响。在分析的第二部分,我们着眼于拍卖内部和拍卖之间的行为以及影响它的因素。我们发现,除其他事项外,“赢家的诅咒”问题发挥了核心作用,影响了拍卖中的流动性供应、定价偏差以及竞买人在拍卖中根据拍卖第一阶段披露的信息更新其私人信息。在本文的最后一部分,在一些简化的假设下,我们进行了结构估计来恢复信号的底层分布。使用这些估计,我们发现替代拍卖形式可以减少拍卖最终价格的偏差量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CDS Credit-Event Auctions
Credit-event auctions were introduced in 2005 to facilitate cash settlement in the credit default swap market following a credit event. They have a novel two-stage structure that makes them distinct from other auction forms. This paper studies outcomes in credit-event auctions over the period 2008-10.Our analysis is in three parts. In the first part, we look at the efficacy of price discovery in the auction. We find that the auction price has a significant bias relative to the pre- and post-auction market prices for the same instruments, and that volatility of market prices often increases after the auction; nonetheless, we find that information generated in the auction has considerable impact on post-auction market prices. In the second part of the analysis, we look at behavior within and across auctions and the factors that influence it. We find, among other things, that “winner’s curse” concerns play a central role, affecting liquidity provision in the auction, the pricing bias, and bidders’ within-auction updating of their private information based on information revealed in the auction’s first stage. In the final part of the paper, under some simplifying assumptions, we carry out a structural estimation to recover the underlying distribution of signals. Using these estimates, we find that the alternative auction formats could reduce the amount of bias in the auction final price.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信