{"title":"CDS信用事件拍卖","authors":"Sudip Gupta, R. Sundaram","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2023243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit-event auctions were introduced in 2005 to facilitate cash settlement in the credit default swap market following a credit event. They have a novel two-stage structure that makes them distinct from other auction forms. This paper studies outcomes in credit-event auctions over the period 2008-10.Our analysis is in three parts. In the first part, we look at the efficacy of price discovery in the auction. We find that the auction price has a significant bias relative to the pre- and post-auction market prices for the same instruments, and that volatility of market prices often increases after the auction; nonetheless, we find that information generated in the auction has considerable impact on post-auction market prices. In the second part of the analysis, we look at behavior within and across auctions and the factors that influence it. We find, among other things, that “winner’s curse” concerns play a central role, affecting liquidity provision in the auction, the pricing bias, and bidders’ within-auction updating of their private information based on information revealed in the auction’s first stage. In the final part of the paper, under some simplifying assumptions, we carry out a structural estimation to recover the underlying distribution of signals. Using these estimates, we find that the alternative auction formats could reduce the amount of bias in the auction final price.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CDS Credit-Event Auctions\",\"authors\":\"Sudip Gupta, R. Sundaram\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2023243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Credit-event auctions were introduced in 2005 to facilitate cash settlement in the credit default swap market following a credit event. They have a novel two-stage structure that makes them distinct from other auction forms. This paper studies outcomes in credit-event auctions over the period 2008-10.Our analysis is in three parts. In the first part, we look at the efficacy of price discovery in the auction. We find that the auction price has a significant bias relative to the pre- and post-auction market prices for the same instruments, and that volatility of market prices often increases after the auction; nonetheless, we find that information generated in the auction has considerable impact on post-auction market prices. In the second part of the analysis, we look at behavior within and across auctions and the factors that influence it. We find, among other things, that “winner’s curse” concerns play a central role, affecting liquidity provision in the auction, the pricing bias, and bidders’ within-auction updating of their private information based on information revealed in the auction’s first stage. In the final part of the paper, under some simplifying assumptions, we carry out a structural estimation to recover the underlying distribution of signals. Using these estimates, we find that the alternative auction formats could reduce the amount of bias in the auction final price.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2023243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2023243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Credit-event auctions were introduced in 2005 to facilitate cash settlement in the credit default swap market following a credit event. They have a novel two-stage structure that makes them distinct from other auction forms. This paper studies outcomes in credit-event auctions over the period 2008-10.Our analysis is in three parts. In the first part, we look at the efficacy of price discovery in the auction. We find that the auction price has a significant bias relative to the pre- and post-auction market prices for the same instruments, and that volatility of market prices often increases after the auction; nonetheless, we find that information generated in the auction has considerable impact on post-auction market prices. In the second part of the analysis, we look at behavior within and across auctions and the factors that influence it. We find, among other things, that “winner’s curse” concerns play a central role, affecting liquidity provision in the auction, the pricing bias, and bidders’ within-auction updating of their private information based on information revealed in the auction’s first stage. In the final part of the paper, under some simplifying assumptions, we carry out a structural estimation to recover the underlying distribution of signals. Using these estimates, we find that the alternative auction formats could reduce the amount of bias in the auction final price.