在3英尺处转换声功率级到声压级的选项

Fred Reiter
{"title":"在3英尺处转换声功率级到声压级的选项","authors":"Fred Reiter","doi":"10.1109/PCIC42668.2022.10181268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Active motor sound level limit specifications NEMA MG1-2016 & IEC60034-9 require that motor manufacturers meet noise levels in terms of sound power levels in decibels. Prior to the last couple of decades, the maximum permissible sound levels were determined based on sound pressure levels typically at three feet or one meter from the motor’s suffices per outdated sound specification IEEE 85-1973. Subsequently, and contrary to what they had done for decades, motor manufacturers may no longer record sound pressure levels, or they may record them at a distance other than 3 feet, of with a measurement surface other than a rectangular box. To accommodate customers that still request noise tests in terms of sound pressure at 3 feet / 1 meter, and also to compare with decades of legacy motor noise test data, two traditional methods and two alternate methods for converting sound power to sound pressure at three feet have been compared to the measured noise test results of ten medium AC motors. One traditional conversion method and one of the two alternate methods yield the closest sound pressure levels compared to the measured values at 3 feet. The half-cylinder conformal surface method and the average distance to each rectilinear surface method underestimate the sound pressure at 3 feet by less than 1 dB on average.","PeriodicalId":301848,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE IAS Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference (PCIC)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Options for Converting Sound Power Levels to Sound Pressure Levels at 3 Feet\",\"authors\":\"Fred Reiter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PCIC42668.2022.10181268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Active motor sound level limit specifications NEMA MG1-2016 & IEC60034-9 require that motor manufacturers meet noise levels in terms of sound power levels in decibels. Prior to the last couple of decades, the maximum permissible sound levels were determined based on sound pressure levels typically at three feet or one meter from the motor’s suffices per outdated sound specification IEEE 85-1973. Subsequently, and contrary to what they had done for decades, motor manufacturers may no longer record sound pressure levels, or they may record them at a distance other than 3 feet, of with a measurement surface other than a rectangular box. To accommodate customers that still request noise tests in terms of sound pressure at 3 feet / 1 meter, and also to compare with decades of legacy motor noise test data, two traditional methods and two alternate methods for converting sound power to sound pressure at three feet have been compared to the measured noise test results of ten medium AC motors. One traditional conversion method and one of the two alternate methods yield the closest sound pressure levels compared to the measured values at 3 feet. The half-cylinder conformal surface method and the average distance to each rectilinear surface method underestimate the sound pressure at 3 feet by less than 1 dB on average.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE IAS Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference (PCIC)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE IAS Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference (PCIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCIC42668.2022.10181268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE IAS Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference (PCIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCIC42668.2022.10181268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

主动电机声级限制规范NEMA MG1-2016和IEC60034-9要求电机制造商满足以分贝为单位的声功率级的噪声水平。在过去几十年之前,最大允许声级是根据过时的声音规范IEEE 85-1973中距离电机3英尺或1米的声压级确定的。随后,与他们几十年来所做的相反,电机制造商可能不再记录声压级,或者他们可能在3英尺以外的距离记录声压级,或者使用测量表面而不是矩形盒。为了满足仍然要求在3英尺/ 1米处进行声压噪声测试的客户,并与数十年的传统电机噪声测试数据进行比较,将两种传统方法和两种替代方法将声功率转换为3英尺处的声压,并将10个中等交流电机的实测噪声测试结果进行比较。与3英尺处的测量值相比,一种传统转换方法和两种替代方法中的一种产生的声压级最接近。半圆柱保形面法和到每个直线面的平均距离法对3英尺处声压的平均低估小于1 dB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Options for Converting Sound Power Levels to Sound Pressure Levels at 3 Feet
Active motor sound level limit specifications NEMA MG1-2016 & IEC60034-9 require that motor manufacturers meet noise levels in terms of sound power levels in decibels. Prior to the last couple of decades, the maximum permissible sound levels were determined based on sound pressure levels typically at three feet or one meter from the motor’s suffices per outdated sound specification IEEE 85-1973. Subsequently, and contrary to what they had done for decades, motor manufacturers may no longer record sound pressure levels, or they may record them at a distance other than 3 feet, of with a measurement surface other than a rectangular box. To accommodate customers that still request noise tests in terms of sound pressure at 3 feet / 1 meter, and also to compare with decades of legacy motor noise test data, two traditional methods and two alternate methods for converting sound power to sound pressure at three feet have been compared to the measured noise test results of ten medium AC motors. One traditional conversion method and one of the two alternate methods yield the closest sound pressure levels compared to the measured values at 3 feet. The half-cylinder conformal surface method and the average distance to each rectilinear surface method underestimate the sound pressure at 3 feet by less than 1 dB on average.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信