在比利时和法国的RDPLF腹膜透析和家庭血液透析之间的过渡

C. Verger, E. Fabre
{"title":"在比利时和法国的RDPLF腹膜透析和家庭血液透析之间的过渡","authors":"C. Verger, E. Fabre","doi":"10.25796/BDD.V3I3.58393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A renewed interest in home hemodialysis has emerged in recent years, favored by the availability of new dialysis machines and encouraging publication about  daily hemodialysis. Since 2013, the RDPLF has become a home dialysis registry that records the data of patients treated with peritoneal dialysis and those treated with home hemodialysis, all techniques combined. Nine Belgian centers and fifty seven French centers communicate information about their patients treated by hemodialysis at home. In the RDPLF centers, 56% of Belgian home hemodialysis patients are treated with daily hemodialysis, in France 83% of home patients are on daily dialysis. This French difference however is not representative of the whole country but can be explained through recruitment of new centers already involved in peritoneal dialysis and convinced by the interest of continuaous daily treatment. In both countries, 13% of home hemodialysis patients have been previously treated with peritoneal dialysis with an interim period of in-center hemodialysis or transplantation. The median duration of in center hemodialysis is 10 months with extremes ranging from 2 months to 25 years. PD patients treated secondarily in home hemodialysis are mainly young, non-diabetic and independent patients. Early information in patients who have a risk of peritoneal dialysis failure, and the provision of materials allowing both techniques would reduce or abolish a transient transfer to in center hemodialysis  and would ensure home care in patients who prefer.","PeriodicalId":366938,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transition between peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis in Belgium and France in the RDPLF\",\"authors\":\"C. Verger, E. Fabre\",\"doi\":\"10.25796/BDD.V3I3.58393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A renewed interest in home hemodialysis has emerged in recent years, favored by the availability of new dialysis machines and encouraging publication about  daily hemodialysis. Since 2013, the RDPLF has become a home dialysis registry that records the data of patients treated with peritoneal dialysis and those treated with home hemodialysis, all techniques combined. Nine Belgian centers and fifty seven French centers communicate information about their patients treated by hemodialysis at home. In the RDPLF centers, 56% of Belgian home hemodialysis patients are treated with daily hemodialysis, in France 83% of home patients are on daily dialysis. This French difference however is not representative of the whole country but can be explained through recruitment of new centers already involved in peritoneal dialysis and convinced by the interest of continuaous daily treatment. In both countries, 13% of home hemodialysis patients have been previously treated with peritoneal dialysis with an interim period of in-center hemodialysis or transplantation. The median duration of in center hemodialysis is 10 months with extremes ranging from 2 months to 25 years. PD patients treated secondarily in home hemodialysis are mainly young, non-diabetic and independent patients. Early information in patients who have a risk of peritoneal dialysis failure, and the provision of materials allowing both techniques would reduce or abolish a transient transfer to in center hemodialysis  and would ensure home care in patients who prefer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":366938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25796/BDD.V3I3.58393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25796/BDD.V3I3.58393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

近年来,由于新的透析机的可用性和关于日常血液透析的鼓励出版物的出现,人们对家庭血液透析重新产生了兴趣。自2013年以来,RDPLF已成为一个家庭透析登记处,记录了接受腹膜透析治疗的患者和接受家庭血液透析治疗的患者的数据,所有技术相结合。9个比利时中心和57个法国中心交流他们的患者在家接受血液透析治疗的信息。在RDPLF中心,56%的比利时家庭血液透析患者每天接受血液透析治疗,而在法国,83%的家庭患者每天接受血液透析治疗。然而,法国的这种差异并不能代表整个国家,但可以通过招募已经参与腹膜透析的新中心来解释,并被持续每日治疗的利益所说服。在这两个国家,13%的家庭血液透析患者以前接受过腹膜透析治疗,中间进行过中心血液透析或移植。中心血液透析的中位持续时间为10个月,极值从2个月到25年不等。家庭血液透析继发治疗的PD患者以年轻、非糖尿病、独立患者为主。有腹膜透析失败风险的患者的早期信息,以及允许这两种技术的材料的提供,将减少或取消暂时转移到中心血液透析,并确保有意愿的患者的家庭护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transition between peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis in Belgium and France in the RDPLF
A renewed interest in home hemodialysis has emerged in recent years, favored by the availability of new dialysis machines and encouraging publication about  daily hemodialysis. Since 2013, the RDPLF has become a home dialysis registry that records the data of patients treated with peritoneal dialysis and those treated with home hemodialysis, all techniques combined. Nine Belgian centers and fifty seven French centers communicate information about their patients treated by hemodialysis at home. In the RDPLF centers, 56% of Belgian home hemodialysis patients are treated with daily hemodialysis, in France 83% of home patients are on daily dialysis. This French difference however is not representative of the whole country but can be explained through recruitment of new centers already involved in peritoneal dialysis and convinced by the interest of continuaous daily treatment. In both countries, 13% of home hemodialysis patients have been previously treated with peritoneal dialysis with an interim period of in-center hemodialysis or transplantation. The median duration of in center hemodialysis is 10 months with extremes ranging from 2 months to 25 years. PD patients treated secondarily in home hemodialysis are mainly young, non-diabetic and independent patients. Early information in patients who have a risk of peritoneal dialysis failure, and the provision of materials allowing both techniques would reduce or abolish a transient transfer to in center hemodialysis  and would ensure home care in patients who prefer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信