金属体系表征的等温与标准晶圆片电迁移试验

D. Brisbin, T. Turner
{"title":"金属体系表征的等温与标准晶圆片电迁移试验","authors":"D. Brisbin, T. Turner","doi":"10.1109/IRWS.1997.660308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The isothermal electromigration test has recently been introduced as a potential alternative to the SWEAT technique. In the isothermal test, the stress current is adjusted in a feedback loop so that a constant metal line temperature is maintained. This differs from the SWEAT test, where the mean time to failure (MTF) as predicted by Black's equation is the control parameter. Once at the control temperature, the isothermal test can utilize three alternative stress modes: constant power, constant current or constant resistance (temperature). The isothermal test has several important advantages, including: (1) simplicity of implementation; (2) line temperature is directly controlled, so it is easier to avoid the bulk diffusion region; (3) algorithm does not require empirical adjustment of acceleration factors; (4) alternative stress modes are available to optimize performance. The purpose of this paper is to compare the isothermal and SWEAT tests experimentally in terms of MTF and standard deviation, and to evaluate the three different isothermal test modes of constant power, constant current or constant resistance.","PeriodicalId":193522,"journal":{"name":"1997 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop Final Report (Cat. No.97TH8319)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isothermal versus standard wafer electromigration test for the characterization of metal systems\",\"authors\":\"D. Brisbin, T. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IRWS.1997.660308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The isothermal electromigration test has recently been introduced as a potential alternative to the SWEAT technique. In the isothermal test, the stress current is adjusted in a feedback loop so that a constant metal line temperature is maintained. This differs from the SWEAT test, where the mean time to failure (MTF) as predicted by Black's equation is the control parameter. Once at the control temperature, the isothermal test can utilize three alternative stress modes: constant power, constant current or constant resistance (temperature). The isothermal test has several important advantages, including: (1) simplicity of implementation; (2) line temperature is directly controlled, so it is easier to avoid the bulk diffusion region; (3) algorithm does not require empirical adjustment of acceleration factors; (4) alternative stress modes are available to optimize performance. The purpose of this paper is to compare the isothermal and SWEAT tests experimentally in terms of MTF and standard deviation, and to evaluate the three different isothermal test modes of constant power, constant current or constant resistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1997 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop Final Report (Cat. No.97TH8319)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1997 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop Final Report (Cat. No.97TH8319)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRWS.1997.660308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1997 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop Final Report (Cat. No.97TH8319)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRWS.1997.660308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

最近引入了等温电迁移测试,作为SWEAT技术的潜在替代方案。在等温试验中,在反馈回路中调节应力电流,使金属线温度保持恒定。这与SWEAT测试不同,在SWEAT测试中,Black方程预测的平均故障间隔时间(MTF)是控制参数。一旦达到控制温度,等温测试可以使用三种替代应力模式:恒功率,恒电流或恒电阻(温度)。等温测试有几个重要的优点,包括:(1)实现简单;(2)直接控制线温,更容易避免体扩散区;(3)算法不需要经验调整加速度因子;(4)可选择的应力模式优化性能。本文的目的是在MTF和标准差方面对等温和SWEAT试验进行实验比较,并对恒功率、恒电流和恒电阻三种不同的等温试验模式进行评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Isothermal versus standard wafer electromigration test for the characterization of metal systems
The isothermal electromigration test has recently been introduced as a potential alternative to the SWEAT technique. In the isothermal test, the stress current is adjusted in a feedback loop so that a constant metal line temperature is maintained. This differs from the SWEAT test, where the mean time to failure (MTF) as predicted by Black's equation is the control parameter. Once at the control temperature, the isothermal test can utilize three alternative stress modes: constant power, constant current or constant resistance (temperature). The isothermal test has several important advantages, including: (1) simplicity of implementation; (2) line temperature is directly controlled, so it is easier to avoid the bulk diffusion region; (3) algorithm does not require empirical adjustment of acceleration factors; (4) alternative stress modes are available to optimize performance. The purpose of this paper is to compare the isothermal and SWEAT tests experimentally in terms of MTF and standard deviation, and to evaluate the three different isothermal test modes of constant power, constant current or constant resistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信