平衡中国智能法院的尺度:通过人工智能推动案件标准化

Elinor Greenhouse
{"title":"平衡中国智能法院的尺度:通过人工智能推动案件标准化","authors":"Elinor Greenhouse","doi":"10.1080/20517483.2021.2020500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper positions the use of new technologies in China’s smart courts as a continuation of the professionalisation of China’s judiciary. This series of reforms is the backbone of China’s rule of law society reforms, as set out in the 14th five-year plan, and has been adopted as a method to standardise judgements within a court system headed by elite justices, yet underpinned by a legacy of under-qualified judges with significant practical experience. While the smart court systems have demonstrated significant savings in terms of time and costs for litigants, smart courts are no panacea for betterment of rule of law. The quality of judicial big data, potential black box nature and bias of the algorithms used, coupled with the potential for over-reliance or under-reliance on the software, all present significant challenges to the safe and successful deployment of legal tech in China’s smart courts. Reaching the lofty goals set out for its use requires a consistent and mindful approach to the betterment of both the technology itself and the training of those using it, so that pitfalls and faults in its employ can be both ameliorated and flagged by the users themselves: the judges.","PeriodicalId":108655,"journal":{"name":"Peking University Law Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing the scales in China’s smart courts: driving case standardisation through AI\",\"authors\":\"Elinor Greenhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20517483.2021.2020500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper positions the use of new technologies in China’s smart courts as a continuation of the professionalisation of China’s judiciary. This series of reforms is the backbone of China’s rule of law society reforms, as set out in the 14th five-year plan, and has been adopted as a method to standardise judgements within a court system headed by elite justices, yet underpinned by a legacy of under-qualified judges with significant practical experience. While the smart court systems have demonstrated significant savings in terms of time and costs for litigants, smart courts are no panacea for betterment of rule of law. The quality of judicial big data, potential black box nature and bias of the algorithms used, coupled with the potential for over-reliance or under-reliance on the software, all present significant challenges to the safe and successful deployment of legal tech in China’s smart courts. Reaching the lofty goals set out for its use requires a consistent and mindful approach to the betterment of both the technology itself and the training of those using it, so that pitfalls and faults in its employ can be both ameliorated and flagged by the users themselves: the judges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2021.2020500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peking University Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2021.2020500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文将中国智能法院新技术的应用定位为中国司法专业化的延续。这一系列改革是“十四五”规划中提出的中国法治社会改革的支柱,并已被作为一种方法,在由精英法官领导的法院系统内规范判决,但由具有丰富实践经验的资历不高的法官遗留下来。虽然智能法院系统为诉讼当事人节省了大量的时间和成本,但智能法院并不是改善法治的灵丹妙药。司法大数据的质量、所使用算法的潜在黑箱性质和偏见,以及对软件的过度依赖或不依赖的可能性,都对中国智能法院安全、成功地部署法律技术构成了重大挑战。要达到为使用人工智能设定的崇高目标,需要始终如一地采取谨慎的方法来改进技术本身,并对使用它的人进行培训,以便用户自己(即法官)可以改善和标记使用过程中的陷阱和错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing the scales in China’s smart courts: driving case standardisation through AI
ABSTRACT This paper positions the use of new technologies in China’s smart courts as a continuation of the professionalisation of China’s judiciary. This series of reforms is the backbone of China’s rule of law society reforms, as set out in the 14th five-year plan, and has been adopted as a method to standardise judgements within a court system headed by elite justices, yet underpinned by a legacy of under-qualified judges with significant practical experience. While the smart court systems have demonstrated significant savings in terms of time and costs for litigants, smart courts are no panacea for betterment of rule of law. The quality of judicial big data, potential black box nature and bias of the algorithms used, coupled with the potential for over-reliance or under-reliance on the software, all present significant challenges to the safe and successful deployment of legal tech in China’s smart courts. Reaching the lofty goals set out for its use requires a consistent and mindful approach to the betterment of both the technology itself and the training of those using it, so that pitfalls and faults in its employ can be both ameliorated and flagged by the users themselves: the judges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信