全腕部置换术:现状、挑战和缺陷:比较回顾

I. Schmidt
{"title":"全腕部置换术:现状、挑战和缺陷:比较回顾","authors":"I. Schmidt","doi":"10.33425/2768-4598.1024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Total wrist replacement (TWR) as motion-preserving procedure continues to be critically discussed in the literature, although the complication rates have been significantly reduced with the current 3rd generation designs compared with older types. Possible reasons for this are often also a lack of knowledge about the currently available evidence, the complication management, and the lack of practical experience by the surgeons. Methods Based on an extended review of literature and own experience, the aim of this article is to give practicable insights for the clinician on: (1) biomechanical fundamentals, (2) differences in design, survivorship and functional outcome between the recent types, (3) possible pitfalls, and (4) failures and salvage options. Results The goal of TWR is that the overall wrist motion is maintained respectively improved despite it works with a locked midcarpal joint. Regarding survivorship and functional outcome the Maestro is (was) being superior over all other types that is (was) based on features in design. There is no scientific evidence as to why the Maestro was withdrawn from the marketplace by the company. For assessment of instability and/or impingement the use of dynamic radiographs is recommended. The problem of TWR is unchanged failure of the carpal components primarily based on mechanical dysbalance, and secondarily followed by metal and/or polyethylene wear, but surgical revision of asyptomatic periprosthetic osteolysis without safe radiagraphic signs of loosening is only required in not more than 20% of cases. For a failed TWR, revision TWR or conversion to total wrist arthrodesis are viable salvage options. Conclusions The knowledge about recent evidence and features in design of the available types, exact assessment of radiographic findings, presence of technical skills by the surgeons, and observance of the patient's expectations are the basic requirements for a successful TWR.","PeriodicalId":371381,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Trials","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total Wrist Replacement: State of the Art, Challenges and Pitfalls: A Comparative Review\",\"authors\":\"I. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2768-4598.1024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Total wrist replacement (TWR) as motion-preserving procedure continues to be critically discussed in the literature, although the complication rates have been significantly reduced with the current 3rd generation designs compared with older types. Possible reasons for this are often also a lack of knowledge about the currently available evidence, the complication management, and the lack of practical experience by the surgeons. Methods Based on an extended review of literature and own experience, the aim of this article is to give practicable insights for the clinician on: (1) biomechanical fundamentals, (2) differences in design, survivorship and functional outcome between the recent types, (3) possible pitfalls, and (4) failures and salvage options. Results The goal of TWR is that the overall wrist motion is maintained respectively improved despite it works with a locked midcarpal joint. Regarding survivorship and functional outcome the Maestro is (was) being superior over all other types that is (was) based on features in design. There is no scientific evidence as to why the Maestro was withdrawn from the marketplace by the company. For assessment of instability and/or impingement the use of dynamic radiographs is recommended. The problem of TWR is unchanged failure of the carpal components primarily based on mechanical dysbalance, and secondarily followed by metal and/or polyethylene wear, but surgical revision of asyptomatic periprosthetic osteolysis without safe radiagraphic signs of loosening is only required in not more than 20% of cases. For a failed TWR, revision TWR or conversion to total wrist arthrodesis are viable salvage options. Conclusions The knowledge about recent evidence and features in design of the available types, exact assessment of radiographic findings, presence of technical skills by the surgeons, and observance of the patient's expectations are the basic requirements for a successful TWR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2768-4598.1024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2768-4598.1024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:文献中对全腕部置换术(TWR)作为保持运动的手术进行了批判性的讨论,尽管与旧类型相比,目前的第三代设计已显著降低了并发症发生率。造成这种情况的可能原因还包括缺乏对现有证据的了解、并发症的处理以及外科医生缺乏实践经验。方法基于对文献和自身经验的广泛回顾,本文的目的是为临床医生提供以下方面的实用见解:(1)生物力学基础;(2)最近类型之间设计、生存和功能结局的差异;(3)可能的陷阱;(4)失败和挽救方案。结果在腕中关节锁定的情况下,TWR的目标是保持手腕整体运动的改善。就生存和功能结果而言,Maestro(曾经)优于所有其他基于设计特征的类型。没有科学证据表明为什么大师被公司从市场上撤下。对于不稳定性和/或撞击的评估,建议使用动态x线片。TWR的问题是主要基于机械失衡的腕关节部件失效,其次是金属和/或聚乙烯磨损,但只有不超过20%的病例需要对无症状的假体周围骨溶解进行手术翻修,而没有安全的影像学松动迹象。对于失败的TWR,改良TWR或转全腕关节融合术是可行的挽救选择。结论了解最新的证据和特征,设计可用的类型,准确评估x线表现,外科医生的技术技能,并遵守患者的期望是成功的TWR的基本要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Total Wrist Replacement: State of the Art, Challenges and Pitfalls: A Comparative Review
Background Total wrist replacement (TWR) as motion-preserving procedure continues to be critically discussed in the literature, although the complication rates have been significantly reduced with the current 3rd generation designs compared with older types. Possible reasons for this are often also a lack of knowledge about the currently available evidence, the complication management, and the lack of practical experience by the surgeons. Methods Based on an extended review of literature and own experience, the aim of this article is to give practicable insights for the clinician on: (1) biomechanical fundamentals, (2) differences in design, survivorship and functional outcome between the recent types, (3) possible pitfalls, and (4) failures and salvage options. Results The goal of TWR is that the overall wrist motion is maintained respectively improved despite it works with a locked midcarpal joint. Regarding survivorship and functional outcome the Maestro is (was) being superior over all other types that is (was) based on features in design. There is no scientific evidence as to why the Maestro was withdrawn from the marketplace by the company. For assessment of instability and/or impingement the use of dynamic radiographs is recommended. The problem of TWR is unchanged failure of the carpal components primarily based on mechanical dysbalance, and secondarily followed by metal and/or polyethylene wear, but surgical revision of asyptomatic periprosthetic osteolysis without safe radiagraphic signs of loosening is only required in not more than 20% of cases. For a failed TWR, revision TWR or conversion to total wrist arthrodesis are viable salvage options. Conclusions The knowledge about recent evidence and features in design of the available types, exact assessment of radiographic findings, presence of technical skills by the surgeons, and observance of the patient's expectations are the basic requirements for a successful TWR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信