元现代心理学:对可能发展的心理哲学分析

A. Grebenyuk
{"title":"元现代心理学:对可能发展的心理哲学分析","authors":"A. Grebenyuk","doi":"10.37279/2413-1709-2020-6-3-67-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The formation of a new dominant type of culture at the beginning of the 21st century – metamodernism – required the creation of psychological images of a person that would face the challenges of the modern diverse and contradictory world with its all-pervasive virtualization and the creation of previously unseen simulacra of very high orders. Due to these, arose the need for a holistic syncretic reconstruction of psychology as a contradictory unity of science, art and craft.\n\nMetamodernism suggests that psychology go on to describe the nature of the psyche and human behavior, using the language of a new aesthetic form – pragmatic romanticism without ideologies. Why shift the research focus from studying a person’s attitude to self, activities and to other people, to expressing this attitude so that one begins to see the study of psychological problems presented by a person, the way one expresses one’s attitude to them, based on true scale of their meaning for one’s personality. The transition happens from studying “attitude to the problem” to studying “expression of the attitude to the problem” consequently excluding provocativeness and irony from psychological tools, which are replaced by a warm human attitude, which is supported by self-reflection, intertextuality and by various references to other cultural forms of expression of the attitude to the problem.\n\nMetamodern psychology does not choose a modernist romantic claim to a deep knowledge of the psyche and human behavior, or a postmodern superficiality of such knowledge, but a metamodern depthlessness, in which the presence of a depth of the psyche is recognized, acknowledging that psychology can occasionally peer into, sometimes revealing things previously unseen by it. Guided by the principle of “fluctuation,” it explores as objects of study trivial psychic and behavioral mechanisms and phenomena that, from a modernist and postmodern aesthetic point of view, habitually seem unattractive, simplistic or trivial to view their always existing natural beauty without irony and change them attitude. It suggests starting to view the psychologist as a go-between the client’s inner world, containing a variety of forms hidden in its movements, and psychological concepts, as a result of which it tightly connects the psychological plan formed in the process of such interaction with its implementation.","PeriodicalId":348416,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"METAMO-MODERN PSYCHOLOGY: PSYCHOLOGICAL-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT\",\"authors\":\"A. Grebenyuk\",\"doi\":\"10.37279/2413-1709-2020-6-3-67-76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The formation of a new dominant type of culture at the beginning of the 21st century – metamodernism – required the creation of psychological images of a person that would face the challenges of the modern diverse and contradictory world with its all-pervasive virtualization and the creation of previously unseen simulacra of very high orders. Due to these, arose the need for a holistic syncretic reconstruction of psychology as a contradictory unity of science, art and craft.\\n\\nMetamodernism suggests that psychology go on to describe the nature of the psyche and human behavior, using the language of a new aesthetic form – pragmatic romanticism without ideologies. Why shift the research focus from studying a person’s attitude to self, activities and to other people, to expressing this attitude so that one begins to see the study of psychological problems presented by a person, the way one expresses one’s attitude to them, based on true scale of their meaning for one’s personality. The transition happens from studying “attitude to the problem” to studying “expression of the attitude to the problem” consequently excluding provocativeness and irony from psychological tools, which are replaced by a warm human attitude, which is supported by self-reflection, intertextuality and by various references to other cultural forms of expression of the attitude to the problem.\\n\\nMetamodern psychology does not choose a modernist romantic claim to a deep knowledge of the psyche and human behavior, or a postmodern superficiality of such knowledge, but a metamodern depthlessness, in which the presence of a depth of the psyche is recognized, acknowledging that psychology can occasionally peer into, sometimes revealing things previously unseen by it. Guided by the principle of “fluctuation,” it explores as objects of study trivial psychic and behavioral mechanisms and phenomena that, from a modernist and postmodern aesthetic point of view, habitually seem unattractive, simplistic or trivial to view their always existing natural beauty without irony and change them attitude. It suggests starting to view the psychologist as a go-between the client’s inner world, containing a variety of forms hidden in its movements, and psychological concepts, as a result of which it tightly connects the psychological plan formed in the process of such interaction with its implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37279/2413-1709-2020-6-3-67-76\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37279/2413-1709-2020-6-3-67-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

21世纪初形成的一种新的主导文化类型——元现代主义,要求创造一个人的心理形象,以面对现代多样化和矛盾世界的挑战,其虚拟化无处不在,并创造前所未有的高阶拟像。由于这些,产生了对心理学作为科学,艺术和工艺的矛盾统一的整体综合重建的需要。元现代主义主张心理学继续用一种新的美学形式——没有意识形态的实用主义浪漫主义的语言来描述心灵和人类行为的本质。为什么要把研究重点从研究一个人对自己、对活动和对他人的态度转移到表达这种态度上来,这样人们就可以开始看到一个人提出的心理问题的研究,一个人表达自己态度的方式,是基于这些问题对一个人个性的真正意义。从研究“对问题的态度”到研究“对问题的态度的表达”的转变发生了,因此从心理工具中排除了挑衅和讽刺,取而代之的是一种温暖的人类态度,这种态度得到了自我反思、互文性和对其他文化形式表达问题态度的各种参考的支持。元现代心理学并没有选择现代主义的浪漫主义,声称对心灵和人类行为有深刻的了解,也没有选择后现代主义的肤浅,而是选择了元现代的深度,在这种深度中,心灵的存在得到了承认,承认心理学偶尔可以窥视,有时可以揭示以前看不见的东西。在“波动”原则的指导下,它探索作为研究对象的琐碎的心理和行为机制和现象,从现代主义和后现代美学的角度来看,习惯上看起来没有吸引力,简单或琐碎,不带讽刺地看待它们始终存在的自然美,并改变它们的态度。它建议开始将心理咨询师视为来访者的内在世界的中间人,它包含着隐藏在其动作中的各种形式,以及心理概念,从而将这种互动过程中形成的心理计划与其实施紧密地联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
METAMO-MODERN PSYCHOLOGY: PSYCHOLOGICAL-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT
The formation of a new dominant type of culture at the beginning of the 21st century – metamodernism – required the creation of psychological images of a person that would face the challenges of the modern diverse and contradictory world with its all-pervasive virtualization and the creation of previously unseen simulacra of very high orders. Due to these, arose the need for a holistic syncretic reconstruction of psychology as a contradictory unity of science, art and craft. Metamodernism suggests that psychology go on to describe the nature of the psyche and human behavior, using the language of a new aesthetic form – pragmatic romanticism without ideologies. Why shift the research focus from studying a person’s attitude to self, activities and to other people, to expressing this attitude so that one begins to see the study of psychological problems presented by a person, the way one expresses one’s attitude to them, based on true scale of their meaning for one’s personality. The transition happens from studying “attitude to the problem” to studying “expression of the attitude to the problem” consequently excluding provocativeness and irony from psychological tools, which are replaced by a warm human attitude, which is supported by self-reflection, intertextuality and by various references to other cultural forms of expression of the attitude to the problem. Metamodern psychology does not choose a modernist romantic claim to a deep knowledge of the psyche and human behavior, or a postmodern superficiality of such knowledge, but a metamodern depthlessness, in which the presence of a depth of the psyche is recognized, acknowledging that psychology can occasionally peer into, sometimes revealing things previously unseen by it. Guided by the principle of “fluctuation,” it explores as objects of study trivial psychic and behavioral mechanisms and phenomena that, from a modernist and postmodern aesthetic point of view, habitually seem unattractive, simplistic or trivial to view their always existing natural beauty without irony and change them attitude. It suggests starting to view the psychologist as a go-between the client’s inner world, containing a variety of forms hidden in its movements, and psychological concepts, as a result of which it tightly connects the psychological plan formed in the process of such interaction with its implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信