实验技术设计在测量程序中的应用。优化应用于局部放电的数字测量的一个例子

R. Bozzo, G. Coletti, C. Gemme, F. Guastavino
{"title":"实验技术设计在测量程序中的应用。优化应用于局部放电的数字测量的一个例子","authors":"R. Bozzo, G. Coletti, C. Gemme, F. Guastavino","doi":"10.1109/IMTC.1997.603993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade, multistage digital measuring systems of partial discharges (PDs) have been introduced, allowing one to support the diagnostic of defects (sites of PDs) in power electric components. They transfer information about defects from full data sets of PD patterns, obtained from a Phase Resolved Partial Discharge Analyser (PRPDA) to reduced data set by implementing pattern recognition techniques. The latter data sets are then classified versus similar reference data sets. The validity of the above diagnostic requires that the measuring process, which is influenced by several factors, is optimised. The three main settings of the PRPDA are among such factors of influence, but so far, as a simple mathematical model of this measuring process is not available, it has not been possible to quantitatively assess their \"weight\" on the validity of above diagnostic. This work presents a successful \"Design Of Experiment\" (DOE) approach to solve the latter problem. The DOE analysis of the results of 81 PD tests performed on a simple physical model of an insulation system quantified the weight and the interaction of the three factors and allowed one to derive criteria for selecting the \"optimal\" values of such factors and the \"optimal\" composition of the reduced data sets.","PeriodicalId":124893,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Sensing, Processing, Networking. IMTC Proceedings","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of design of experiment techniques to measurement procedures. An example of optimisation applied to the digital measurement of partial discharges\",\"authors\":\"R. Bozzo, G. Coletti, C. Gemme, F. Guastavino\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMTC.1997.603993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last decade, multistage digital measuring systems of partial discharges (PDs) have been introduced, allowing one to support the diagnostic of defects (sites of PDs) in power electric components. They transfer information about defects from full data sets of PD patterns, obtained from a Phase Resolved Partial Discharge Analyser (PRPDA) to reduced data set by implementing pattern recognition techniques. The latter data sets are then classified versus similar reference data sets. The validity of the above diagnostic requires that the measuring process, which is influenced by several factors, is optimised. The three main settings of the PRPDA are among such factors of influence, but so far, as a simple mathematical model of this measuring process is not available, it has not been possible to quantitatively assess their \\\"weight\\\" on the validity of above diagnostic. This work presents a successful \\\"Design Of Experiment\\\" (DOE) approach to solve the latter problem. The DOE analysis of the results of 81 PD tests performed on a simple physical model of an insulation system quantified the weight and the interaction of the three factors and allowed one to derive criteria for selecting the \\\"optimal\\\" values of such factors and the \\\"optimal\\\" composition of the reduced data sets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Sensing, Processing, Networking. IMTC Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Sensing, Processing, Networking. IMTC Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.1997.603993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Sensing, Processing, Networking. IMTC Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.1997.603993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在过去的十年中,部分放电的多级数字测量系统(PDs)已经被引入,允许一个支持诊断缺陷(PDs的位置)在电力电气元件。它们通过实现模式识别技术,将从相位分解局部放电分析仪(PRPDA)获得的PD模式的完整数据集中的缺陷信息转换为减少的数据集。然后将后者的数据集与类似的参考数据集进行分类。上述诊断的有效性要求测量过程,这是由几个因素的影响,是优化的。PRPDA的三个主要设置属于这些影响因素,但到目前为止,由于没有这一测量过程的简单数学模型,因此无法定量评估它们对上述诊断有效性的"权重"。这项工作提出了一个成功的“实验设计”(DOE)方法来解决后一个问题。DOE分析了在一个简单的绝缘系统物理模型上进行的81次PD测试结果,量化了这三个因素的权重和相互作用,并允许人们得出选择这些因素的“最佳”值和简化数据集的“最佳”组成的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of design of experiment techniques to measurement procedures. An example of optimisation applied to the digital measurement of partial discharges
In the last decade, multistage digital measuring systems of partial discharges (PDs) have been introduced, allowing one to support the diagnostic of defects (sites of PDs) in power electric components. They transfer information about defects from full data sets of PD patterns, obtained from a Phase Resolved Partial Discharge Analyser (PRPDA) to reduced data set by implementing pattern recognition techniques. The latter data sets are then classified versus similar reference data sets. The validity of the above diagnostic requires that the measuring process, which is influenced by several factors, is optimised. The three main settings of the PRPDA are among such factors of influence, but so far, as a simple mathematical model of this measuring process is not available, it has not been possible to quantitatively assess their "weight" on the validity of above diagnostic. This work presents a successful "Design Of Experiment" (DOE) approach to solve the latter problem. The DOE analysis of the results of 81 PD tests performed on a simple physical model of an insulation system quantified the weight and the interaction of the three factors and allowed one to derive criteria for selecting the "optimal" values of such factors and the "optimal" composition of the reduced data sets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信