社会服务信息获取权的质性研究

Yongho Chon, Yoel Kim, Kwang-Leyol Kim, Seong-Jun Maeng, Bo-Yung Kim
{"title":"社会服务信息获取权的质性研究","authors":"Yongho Chon, Yoel Kim, Kwang-Leyol Kim, Seong-Jun Maeng, Bo-Yung Kim","doi":"10.17924/solc.2022.64.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to examine the experiences and issues of the access to information of social services and explore ways to improve the right of access to information. In-depth interviews and focus group interviews were conducted with twenty participants which were composed of service users and experts in the service area for children, youth, single parents, the elderly, the disabled, community services. It is found that service users attempted to obtain social service information in a number of ways such as the access to public organization and searching in the internet by themselves. However, they experienced difficulties in acquiring the information since the contents and format of it was not provided in a proper way given the particular difficulties and needs of the users. Moreover, the systematic supports was not provided in the processes of using information. The study strongly emphasizes that the right of access to information should be understood as ‘social rights’ and suggests some policy measures, such as the provision of customized information service and the preemptive provision of information through case finding. \n","PeriodicalId":409727,"journal":{"name":"Research Institute for Life and Culture Sogang University","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Study on the Rights of Access to Information on Social Service\",\"authors\":\"Yongho Chon, Yoel Kim, Kwang-Leyol Kim, Seong-Jun Maeng, Bo-Yung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17924/solc.2022.64.139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study is to examine the experiences and issues of the access to information of social services and explore ways to improve the right of access to information. In-depth interviews and focus group interviews were conducted with twenty participants which were composed of service users and experts in the service area for children, youth, single parents, the elderly, the disabled, community services. It is found that service users attempted to obtain social service information in a number of ways such as the access to public organization and searching in the internet by themselves. However, they experienced difficulties in acquiring the information since the contents and format of it was not provided in a proper way given the particular difficulties and needs of the users. Moreover, the systematic supports was not provided in the processes of using information. The study strongly emphasizes that the right of access to information should be understood as ‘social rights’ and suggests some policy measures, such as the provision of customized information service and the preemptive provision of information through case finding. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":409727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Institute for Life and Culture Sogang University\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Institute for Life and Culture Sogang University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17924/solc.2022.64.139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Institute for Life and Culture Sogang University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17924/solc.2022.64.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在检视社会服务资讯获取的经验与问题,并探讨改善资讯获取权的途径。深入访谈及焦点小组访谈共20位参加者,包括儿童、青少年、单亲家长、长者、残疾人士及社区服务的服务使用者及专家。研究发现,服务使用者试图通过自行访问公共机构和在互联网上搜索等多种方式获取社会服务信息。但是,他们在获取资料方面遇到困难,因为鉴于用户的特殊困难和需要,资料的内容和格式没有以适当的方式提供。此外,在使用信息的过程中没有提供系统的支持。本研究强调信息获取权应被理解为一种“社会权利”,并提出了一些政策措施,如提供个性化的信息服务和通过案例查找的方式先发制人地提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Qualitative Study on the Rights of Access to Information on Social Service
The aim of the study is to examine the experiences and issues of the access to information of social services and explore ways to improve the right of access to information. In-depth interviews and focus group interviews were conducted with twenty participants which were composed of service users and experts in the service area for children, youth, single parents, the elderly, the disabled, community services. It is found that service users attempted to obtain social service information in a number of ways such as the access to public organization and searching in the internet by themselves. However, they experienced difficulties in acquiring the information since the contents and format of it was not provided in a proper way given the particular difficulties and needs of the users. Moreover, the systematic supports was not provided in the processes of using information. The study strongly emphasizes that the right of access to information should be understood as ‘social rights’ and suggests some policy measures, such as the provision of customized information service and the preemptive provision of information through case finding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信