[减轻镇咳祛痰药所致精神和行为障碍的行为学研究]。

H Kuribara, S Tadokoro
{"title":"[减轻镇咳祛痰药所致精神和行为障碍的行为学研究]。","authors":"H Kuribara,&nbsp;S Tadokoro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previously, we reported that psychotic and behavioral disorders induced by repeated abuse of a commercial preparation of antitussive and expectorant (BRON-W Solution, SS Pharmaceut.) was mainly due to caffeine (CAF). In order to reduce such problem, we assessed effects of a preparation containing theophylline (THEO) as the substitution of CAF, and dihydrocodeine (2HCOD), methylephedrine (MEPH) and chlorpheniramine (CPA) on ambulatory activity and discrete lever-press avoidance response in mice. It is well known that THEO is less potent in the central action than CAF, but its relaxant action on smooth muscle is about 2 times as potent as that of CAF. Therefore, the dose of THEO administered was half of that of CAF. A significant increase in the ambulatory activity was produced by the administration of CAF and/or mixed preparations, in which CAF was contained with 2HCOD, MEPH and CPA at the same doses with those in BRON 10 ml/kg. The ambulation-increasing effects of THEO and THEO-containing preparations were less potent than those of CAP and CAF-containing preparations. Furthermore, repeated 5 times administration of CAF-containing 4-drug preparation (CAF + 2HCOD+MEPH+CPA) elicited a progressive enhancement of the ambulation-increasing effect. Whereas, almost the same effect was reproduced throughout the 5 times administration of THEO-containing 4-drug preparation (THEO + 2HCOD+MEPH+CPA). The discrete lever-press avoidance response was disrupted (i.e., decrease in the avoidance rate) by CAF-containing preparations. However, THEO-containing preparations did not induce such disruption of the avoidance response, but rather improved the avoidance response (i.e., increase in the avoidance rate).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77015,"journal":{"name":"Arukoru kenkyu to yakubutsu izon = Japanese journal of alcohol studies & drug dependence","volume":"27 2","pages":"159-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Behavioral study on reduction of psychotic and behavioral disorders induced by antitussive and expectorant].\",\"authors\":\"H Kuribara,&nbsp;S Tadokoro\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previously, we reported that psychotic and behavioral disorders induced by repeated abuse of a commercial preparation of antitussive and expectorant (BRON-W Solution, SS Pharmaceut.) was mainly due to caffeine (CAF). In order to reduce such problem, we assessed effects of a preparation containing theophylline (THEO) as the substitution of CAF, and dihydrocodeine (2HCOD), methylephedrine (MEPH) and chlorpheniramine (CPA) on ambulatory activity and discrete lever-press avoidance response in mice. It is well known that THEO is less potent in the central action than CAF, but its relaxant action on smooth muscle is about 2 times as potent as that of CAF. Therefore, the dose of THEO administered was half of that of CAF. A significant increase in the ambulatory activity was produced by the administration of CAF and/or mixed preparations, in which CAF was contained with 2HCOD, MEPH and CPA at the same doses with those in BRON 10 ml/kg. The ambulation-increasing effects of THEO and THEO-containing preparations were less potent than those of CAP and CAF-containing preparations. Furthermore, repeated 5 times administration of CAF-containing 4-drug preparation (CAF + 2HCOD+MEPH+CPA) elicited a progressive enhancement of the ambulation-increasing effect. Whereas, almost the same effect was reproduced throughout the 5 times administration of THEO-containing 4-drug preparation (THEO + 2HCOD+MEPH+CPA). The discrete lever-press avoidance response was disrupted (i.e., decrease in the avoidance rate) by CAF-containing preparations. However, THEO-containing preparations did not induce such disruption of the avoidance response, but rather improved the avoidance response (i.e., increase in the avoidance rate).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arukoru kenkyu to yakubutsu izon = Japanese journal of alcohol studies & drug dependence\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"159-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arukoru kenkyu to yakubutsu izon = Japanese journal of alcohol studies & drug dependence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arukoru kenkyu to yakubutsu izon = Japanese journal of alcohol studies & drug dependence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前,我们报道了反复滥用一种镇咳祛痰药(brown - w Solution, SS制药)引起的精神和行为障碍主要是由咖啡因(CAF)引起的。为了减少这一问题,我们评估了一种含有茶碱(THEO)代替CAF的制剂,以及二氢可因(2HCOD)、甲基麻黄碱(MEPH)和氯苯那敏(CPA)对小鼠动态活性和离散杠杆按回避反应的影响。众所周知,THEO的中枢作用不如CAF,但其对平滑肌的松弛作用约为CAF的2倍。因此,THEO的剂量是CAF的一半。CAF和/或混合制剂中,CAF与2HCOD、MEPH和CPA以与BRON相同的剂量(10 ml/kg)混合施用,可显著提高其动态活性。THEO和含有THEO的制剂的增加活动的作用不如含有CAP和cafo的制剂。此外,反复5次给药CAF + 2HCOD+MEPH+CPA的4种药物制剂可逐渐增强小鼠的活动能力。而含THEO的四药制剂(THEO + 2HCOD+MEPH+CPA) 5次给药后,效果几乎相同。离散的杠杆按压回避反应被含钙制剂破坏(即,降低回避率)。然而,含有theo的制剂并没有引起这种回避反应的破坏,而是改善了回避反应(即增加了回避率)。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Behavioral study on reduction of psychotic and behavioral disorders induced by antitussive and expectorant].

Previously, we reported that psychotic and behavioral disorders induced by repeated abuse of a commercial preparation of antitussive and expectorant (BRON-W Solution, SS Pharmaceut.) was mainly due to caffeine (CAF). In order to reduce such problem, we assessed effects of a preparation containing theophylline (THEO) as the substitution of CAF, and dihydrocodeine (2HCOD), methylephedrine (MEPH) and chlorpheniramine (CPA) on ambulatory activity and discrete lever-press avoidance response in mice. It is well known that THEO is less potent in the central action than CAF, but its relaxant action on smooth muscle is about 2 times as potent as that of CAF. Therefore, the dose of THEO administered was half of that of CAF. A significant increase in the ambulatory activity was produced by the administration of CAF and/or mixed preparations, in which CAF was contained with 2HCOD, MEPH and CPA at the same doses with those in BRON 10 ml/kg. The ambulation-increasing effects of THEO and THEO-containing preparations were less potent than those of CAP and CAF-containing preparations. Furthermore, repeated 5 times administration of CAF-containing 4-drug preparation (CAF + 2HCOD+MEPH+CPA) elicited a progressive enhancement of the ambulation-increasing effect. Whereas, almost the same effect was reproduced throughout the 5 times administration of THEO-containing 4-drug preparation (THEO + 2HCOD+MEPH+CPA). The discrete lever-press avoidance response was disrupted (i.e., decrease in the avoidance rate) by CAF-containing preparations. However, THEO-containing preparations did not induce such disruption of the avoidance response, but rather improved the avoidance response (i.e., increase in the avoidance rate).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信