政治事实信念中的党派偏见

John G. Bullock, A. Gerber, Seth J. Hill, G. Huber
{"title":"政治事实信念中的党派偏见","authors":"John G. Bullock, A. Gerber, Seth J. Hill, G. Huber","doi":"10.1561/100.00014074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Partisanship seems to affect factual beliefs about politics. For example, Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say that the deficit rose during the Clinton administration; Democrats are more likely to say that inflation rose under Reagan. We investigate whether such patterns reflect differing beliefs among partisans or instead reflect a desire to praise one party or criticize another. We develop a model of partisan survey response and report two experiments that are based on the model. The experiments show that small payments for correct and \"don't know\" responses sharply diminish the gap between Democrats and Republicans in responses to \"partisan\" factual questions. The results suggest that the apparent differences in factual beliefs between members of different parties may be more illusory than real.","PeriodicalId":286096,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Political Parties (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"386","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs About Politics\",\"authors\":\"John G. Bullock, A. Gerber, Seth J. Hill, G. Huber\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/100.00014074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Partisanship seems to affect factual beliefs about politics. For example, Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say that the deficit rose during the Clinton administration; Democrats are more likely to say that inflation rose under Reagan. We investigate whether such patterns reflect differing beliefs among partisans or instead reflect a desire to praise one party or criticize another. We develop a model of partisan survey response and report two experiments that are based on the model. The experiments show that small payments for correct and \\\"don't know\\\" responses sharply diminish the gap between Democrats and Republicans in responses to \\\"partisan\\\" factual questions. The results suggest that the apparent differences in factual beliefs between members of different parties may be more illusory than real.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Political Parties (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"386\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Political Parties (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Political Parties (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 386

摘要

党派之争似乎会影响有关政治的事实性信念。例如,共和党人比民主党人更有可能说,在克林顿执政期间,赤字增加了;民主党人更有可能说,通货膨胀在里根执政期间有所上升。我们调查这些模式是否反映了党派之间的不同信仰,还是反映了赞扬一方或批评另一方的愿望。我们开发了一个党派调查反应模型,并报告了基于该模型的两个实验。实验表明,对正确回答和“不知道”回答的小额奖励大大缩小了民主党和共和党在回答“党派”事实问题时的差距。结果表明,不同党派成员在事实信念上的明显差异可能更多是虚幻的,而不是真实的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs About Politics
Partisanship seems to affect factual beliefs about politics. For example, Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say that the deficit rose during the Clinton administration; Democrats are more likely to say that inflation rose under Reagan. We investigate whether such patterns reflect differing beliefs among partisans or instead reflect a desire to praise one party or criticize another. We develop a model of partisan survey response and report two experiments that are based on the model. The experiments show that small payments for correct and "don't know" responses sharply diminish the gap between Democrats and Republicans in responses to "partisan" factual questions. The results suggest that the apparent differences in factual beliefs between members of different parties may be more illusory than real.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信