在调节输出力的过程中,拮抗肌是如何收缩的?

Michihiko Fukunaga, Ryoga Fujioka, Yuta Kawasaki
{"title":"在调节输出力的过程中,拮抗肌是如何收缩的?","authors":"Michihiko Fukunaga, Ryoga Fujioka, Yuta Kawasaki","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muscle forces or joint loads during daily living are important data for designing assistive devices or interfaces. Since it is difficult to measure them, they are usually calculated by static or dynamic simulations. However, such simulation requires some assumptions to solve the statically indeterminate problem, which is, the number of muscles is larger than the number of the static or dynamic conditions. One reason for the indetermination is the simultaneous contraction of the antagonist muscle. Antagonist muscles are considered to be exerted to increase the stiffness of the joint, however, it is not used as the condition to solve the indeterminate problem yet, because there is no quantitative evidence. We have assumed that the antagonist would contract during modulating the output force sensitively. Although we already confirmed the assumption by simulation, the experimental support to show the validation had been lacking. Therefore, we performed the experiment to confirm the assumption using the upper limb. Test subjects were asked to grasp a handle with a force sensor and push/pull it; by maximum force, about half of the maximum force, and the half force by monitoring the output of the force sensor with inputting some unpredictable external force. EMGs of the biceps and triceps brachii were measured. As a result, the antagonist was exerted only in the condition of monitoring the force to modulate the output. Our future plan is to confirm the relation between the magnitude of the antagonist exertion and the sensitivity to modulate the output force.","PeriodicalId":130337,"journal":{"name":"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do the antagonistic muscles contract during modulating the output force?\",\"authors\":\"Michihiko Fukunaga, Ryoga Fujioka, Yuta Kawasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1003041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Muscle forces or joint loads during daily living are important data for designing assistive devices or interfaces. Since it is difficult to measure them, they are usually calculated by static or dynamic simulations. However, such simulation requires some assumptions to solve the statically indeterminate problem, which is, the number of muscles is larger than the number of the static or dynamic conditions. One reason for the indetermination is the simultaneous contraction of the antagonist muscle. Antagonist muscles are considered to be exerted to increase the stiffness of the joint, however, it is not used as the condition to solve the indeterminate problem yet, because there is no quantitative evidence. We have assumed that the antagonist would contract during modulating the output force sensitively. Although we already confirmed the assumption by simulation, the experimental support to show the validation had been lacking. Therefore, we performed the experiment to confirm the assumption using the upper limb. Test subjects were asked to grasp a handle with a force sensor and push/pull it; by maximum force, about half of the maximum force, and the half force by monitoring the output of the force sensor with inputting some unpredictable external force. EMGs of the biceps and triceps brachii were measured. As a result, the antagonist was exerted only in the condition of monitoring the force to modulate the output. Our future plan is to confirm the relation between the magnitude of the antagonist exertion and the sensitivity to modulate the output force.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日常生活中的肌肉力量或关节负荷是设计辅助装置或界面的重要数据。由于难以测量,通常通过静态或动态模拟来计算。然而,这种模拟需要一些假设来解决静不确定问题,即肌肉的数量大于静态或动态条件的数量。不确定的一个原因是拮抗剂肌同时收缩。拮抗剂肌肉被认为是用来增加关节刚度的,但由于没有定量的证据,它还没有被用作解决不确定性问题的条件。我们假设在敏感地调制输出力时拮抗剂会收缩。虽然我们已经通过仿真验证了这一假设,但缺乏证明其有效性的实验支持。因此,我们使用上肢进行实验来证实这一假设。测试对象被要求抓住带有力传感器的手柄并推/拉它;通过最大力,大约是最大力的一半,而这一半力通过监测力传感器的输出,同时输入一些不可预测的外力。测量肱二头肌和肱三头肌肌电图。因此,拮抗剂仅在监测力调节输出的条件下发挥作用。我们未来的计划是确认拮抗作用的强度和调节输出力的灵敏度之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do the antagonistic muscles contract during modulating the output force?
Muscle forces or joint loads during daily living are important data for designing assistive devices or interfaces. Since it is difficult to measure them, they are usually calculated by static or dynamic simulations. However, such simulation requires some assumptions to solve the statically indeterminate problem, which is, the number of muscles is larger than the number of the static or dynamic conditions. One reason for the indetermination is the simultaneous contraction of the antagonist muscle. Antagonist muscles are considered to be exerted to increase the stiffness of the joint, however, it is not used as the condition to solve the indeterminate problem yet, because there is no quantitative evidence. We have assumed that the antagonist would contract during modulating the output force sensitively. Although we already confirmed the assumption by simulation, the experimental support to show the validation had been lacking. Therefore, we performed the experiment to confirm the assumption using the upper limb. Test subjects were asked to grasp a handle with a force sensor and push/pull it; by maximum force, about half of the maximum force, and the half force by monitoring the output of the force sensor with inputting some unpredictable external force. EMGs of the biceps and triceps brachii were measured. As a result, the antagonist was exerted only in the condition of monitoring the force to modulate the output. Our future plan is to confirm the relation between the magnitude of the antagonist exertion and the sensitivity to modulate the output force.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信