供应链效率与效率指标的关系

N. Bocharova
{"title":"供应链效率与效率指标的关系","authors":"N. Bocharova","doi":"10.30977/etk.2225-2304.2022.39.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the difference between the concepts of efficiency and effectiveness of supply chains. It is established that effective management of production processes and logistics of any enterprise is not possible without determining the relevant and structured information about the state of the elements of the supply chain and the processes that take place in it. It is researched and formulated that the generally accepted system of measuring the efficiency of the enterprise is a balanced system of key indicators of supply chain efficiency. But based on the analysis of different points of view of scientists, it is determined that to assess the effectiveness of supply chains of enterprises, the vast majority of scientists suggest using ten key indicators, namely: service quality, product quality, lead time (response rate), overall logistics costs, financial indicators ), value added, reliability, flexibility (maneuverability), power, assets. The differences between the SCOR model used at the three levels of metrics, which are designed to assess the effectiveness of decisions at the strategic level, have been studied and established. At the first level, there are indicators that characterize the general state of the supply chain – key performance indicators (KPI – Key Performance Indicator). At the second level – indicators that help diagnose level 1 indicators and identify deviations. The third level of indicators diagnoses the indicators of the 2nd level, respectively. In this case, all metrics must have a hierarchical structure. It is established that the main differences between the concepts of efficiency and effectiveness of supply chains are that efficiency is associated with minimizing all related resources and processes, while efficiency is aimed at achieving all goals, higher results, completed activities and customer satisfaction, focusing on the customer and the goal as much as possible, thus achieving supply chain optimization. Effectiveness is the highest attempt to reduce all resources by maximizing the use of all capacities, the response tries to be as flexible and customer-oriented as possible. A matrix of efficiency of supply chains is proposed, which takes into account the indicators of their efficiency. Efficiency and effectiveness can improve the productivity of the supply chain through enhanced collaboration with all relevant actors.","PeriodicalId":372796,"journal":{"name":"Economics of the transport complex","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EFFICIENCY AND EFFICIENCY INDICATORS OF SUPPLY CHAINS\",\"authors\":\"N. Bocharova\",\"doi\":\"10.30977/etk.2225-2304.2022.39.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the difference between the concepts of efficiency and effectiveness of supply chains. It is established that effective management of production processes and logistics of any enterprise is not possible without determining the relevant and structured information about the state of the elements of the supply chain and the processes that take place in it. It is researched and formulated that the generally accepted system of measuring the efficiency of the enterprise is a balanced system of key indicators of supply chain efficiency. But based on the analysis of different points of view of scientists, it is determined that to assess the effectiveness of supply chains of enterprises, the vast majority of scientists suggest using ten key indicators, namely: service quality, product quality, lead time (response rate), overall logistics costs, financial indicators ), value added, reliability, flexibility (maneuverability), power, assets. The differences between the SCOR model used at the three levels of metrics, which are designed to assess the effectiveness of decisions at the strategic level, have been studied and established. At the first level, there are indicators that characterize the general state of the supply chain – key performance indicators (KPI – Key Performance Indicator). At the second level – indicators that help diagnose level 1 indicators and identify deviations. The third level of indicators diagnoses the indicators of the 2nd level, respectively. In this case, all metrics must have a hierarchical structure. It is established that the main differences between the concepts of efficiency and effectiveness of supply chains are that efficiency is associated with minimizing all related resources and processes, while efficiency is aimed at achieving all goals, higher results, completed activities and customer satisfaction, focusing on the customer and the goal as much as possible, thus achieving supply chain optimization. Effectiveness is the highest attempt to reduce all resources by maximizing the use of all capacities, the response tries to be as flexible and customer-oriented as possible. A matrix of efficiency of supply chains is proposed, which takes into account the indicators of their efficiency. Efficiency and effectiveness can improve the productivity of the supply chain through enhanced collaboration with all relevant actors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of the transport complex\",\"volume\":\"148 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of the transport complex\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30977/etk.2225-2304.2022.39.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of the transport complex","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30977/etk.2225-2304.2022.39.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了供应链的效率和有效性概念之间的差异。可以确定的是,如果不确定有关供应链要素和其中发生的过程的状态的相关和结构化信息,就不可能对任何企业的生产过程和物流进行有效管理。研究并制定了公认的衡量企业效率的体系是供应链效率关键指标的平衡体系。但在分析了科学家们不同观点的基础上,确定了要评估企业供应链的有效性,绝大多数科学家建议使用十个关键指标,即:服务质量、产品质量、交货时间(响应率)、整体物流成本、财务指标、附加值、可靠性、灵活性(可操作性)、动力、资产。已经研究并建立了用于评估战略层面决策有效性的三个度量级别的SCOR模型之间的差异。在第一级,有表征供应链一般状态的指标-关键绩效指标(KPI -关键绩效指标)。在第二级-帮助诊断第一级指标和识别偏差的指标。第三层指标分别对第二层指标进行诊断。在这种情况下,所有指标都必须具有层次结构。本文认为,供应链的效率和有效性概念的主要区别在于,效率是与最小化所有相关的资源和过程有关,而效率是与实现所有目标,更高的结果,完成的活动和客户满意度有关,尽可能地关注客户和目标,从而实现供应链的优化。有效性是通过最大限度地利用所有能力来减少所有资源的最高尝试,响应试图尽可能灵活和以客户为导向。提出了考虑供应链效率指标的供应链效率矩阵。效率和有效性可以通过加强与所有相关参与者的合作来提高供应链的生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EFFICIENCY AND EFFICIENCY INDICATORS OF SUPPLY CHAINS
The article examines the difference between the concepts of efficiency and effectiveness of supply chains. It is established that effective management of production processes and logistics of any enterprise is not possible without determining the relevant and structured information about the state of the elements of the supply chain and the processes that take place in it. It is researched and formulated that the generally accepted system of measuring the efficiency of the enterprise is a balanced system of key indicators of supply chain efficiency. But based on the analysis of different points of view of scientists, it is determined that to assess the effectiveness of supply chains of enterprises, the vast majority of scientists suggest using ten key indicators, namely: service quality, product quality, lead time (response rate), overall logistics costs, financial indicators ), value added, reliability, flexibility (maneuverability), power, assets. The differences between the SCOR model used at the three levels of metrics, which are designed to assess the effectiveness of decisions at the strategic level, have been studied and established. At the first level, there are indicators that characterize the general state of the supply chain – key performance indicators (KPI – Key Performance Indicator). At the second level – indicators that help diagnose level 1 indicators and identify deviations. The third level of indicators diagnoses the indicators of the 2nd level, respectively. In this case, all metrics must have a hierarchical structure. It is established that the main differences between the concepts of efficiency and effectiveness of supply chains are that efficiency is associated with minimizing all related resources and processes, while efficiency is aimed at achieving all goals, higher results, completed activities and customer satisfaction, focusing on the customer and the goal as much as possible, thus achieving supply chain optimization. Effectiveness is the highest attempt to reduce all resources by maximizing the use of all capacities, the response tries to be as flexible and customer-oriented as possible. A matrix of efficiency of supply chains is proposed, which takes into account the indicators of their efficiency. Efficiency and effectiveness can improve the productivity of the supply chain through enhanced collaboration with all relevant actors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信