评估测量不变性与二分类项目:从赞比亚样本的初等数学评估的情况

Mumba Brian, Alici Devrim, Uzun N. Bilge
{"title":"评估测量不变性与二分类项目:从赞比亚样本的初等数学评估的情况","authors":"Mumba Brian, Alici Devrim, Uzun N. Bilge","doi":"10.26634/jpsy.16.1.18942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of measurement invariance is an essential component of construct validity in psychological measurement. However, the procedure for assessing measurement invariance with dichotomous items partially differs from that of invariance testing with continuous items. However, many studies have focused on invariance testing with continuous items or ordered polytomous items. Hence, this study assessed the measurement invariance with dichotomous items using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The study was conducted with data from primary school students who participated in the Early Grade Mathematics Assessment Survey (EGMA) from different provinces of Zambia in 2018. The study determined measurement invariance for three subtests of EGMA according to gender. The total sample consisted of 4698 individuals (49% male, n = 2305 and 51% female, n = 2393). The method used was a Confirmatory Factor Analysis with three highly correlated factors, number identification, number discrimination, and recognition of number patterns. The findings revealed measurement invariance of the EGMA model as defined by three subtests (number identification, number discrimination, and recognition of number patterns) across gender subgroups. However, individual analysis of each subtest revealed that the test scores have the same unit of measurement for both male and female on two factors, excluding those of number identification that lack measurement invariance. Finally, these results contribute to evidence of validity for EGMA scores in terms of their internal structure from the perspective of equality of measurement.","PeriodicalId":123621,"journal":{"name":"i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing measurement invariance with dichotomous items: The case of early grade mathematic assessment from the zambian sample\",\"authors\":\"Mumba Brian, Alici Devrim, Uzun N. Bilge\",\"doi\":\"10.26634/jpsy.16.1.18942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessment of measurement invariance is an essential component of construct validity in psychological measurement. However, the procedure for assessing measurement invariance with dichotomous items partially differs from that of invariance testing with continuous items. However, many studies have focused on invariance testing with continuous items or ordered polytomous items. Hence, this study assessed the measurement invariance with dichotomous items using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The study was conducted with data from primary school students who participated in the Early Grade Mathematics Assessment Survey (EGMA) from different provinces of Zambia in 2018. The study determined measurement invariance for three subtests of EGMA according to gender. The total sample consisted of 4698 individuals (49% male, n = 2305 and 51% female, n = 2393). The method used was a Confirmatory Factor Analysis with three highly correlated factors, number identification, number discrimination, and recognition of number patterns. The findings revealed measurement invariance of the EGMA model as defined by three subtests (number identification, number discrimination, and recognition of number patterns) across gender subgroups. However, individual analysis of each subtest revealed that the test scores have the same unit of measurement for both male and female on two factors, excluding those of number identification that lack measurement invariance. Finally, these results contribute to evidence of validity for EGMA scores in terms of their internal structure from the perspective of equality of measurement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.16.1.18942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.16.1.18942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

测量不变性评估是心理测量中构念效度的重要组成部分。然而,用二分类项目评估测量不变性的方法与用连续项目评估不变性的方法有部分不同。然而,许多研究都集中在连续项目或有序多元项目的不变性检验上。因此,本研究使用验证性因子分析来评估二分类项目的测量不变性。该研究使用了2018年参加赞比亚不同省份早期数学评估调查(EGMA)的小学生的数据。研究确定了EGMA三个子检验按性别的测量不变性。样本总数为4698人,其中男性占49%,n = 2305,女性占51%,n = 2393。使用的方法是一个验证性因子分析与三个高度相关的因素,数字识别,数字歧视和识别数字模式。研究结果揭示了EGMA模型的测量不变性,该模型由三个子测试(数字识别、数字歧视和数字模式识别)在性别亚组中定义。然而,对每个子测试的个体分析表明,在两个因素上,男性和女性的测试分数具有相同的测量单位,排除了缺乏测量不变性的数字识别。最后,从测量相等性的角度,这些结果有助于证明EGMA分数在其内部结构上的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing measurement invariance with dichotomous items: The case of early grade mathematic assessment from the zambian sample
Assessment of measurement invariance is an essential component of construct validity in psychological measurement. However, the procedure for assessing measurement invariance with dichotomous items partially differs from that of invariance testing with continuous items. However, many studies have focused on invariance testing with continuous items or ordered polytomous items. Hence, this study assessed the measurement invariance with dichotomous items using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The study was conducted with data from primary school students who participated in the Early Grade Mathematics Assessment Survey (EGMA) from different provinces of Zambia in 2018. The study determined measurement invariance for three subtests of EGMA according to gender. The total sample consisted of 4698 individuals (49% male, n = 2305 and 51% female, n = 2393). The method used was a Confirmatory Factor Analysis with three highly correlated factors, number identification, number discrimination, and recognition of number patterns. The findings revealed measurement invariance of the EGMA model as defined by three subtests (number identification, number discrimination, and recognition of number patterns) across gender subgroups. However, individual analysis of each subtest revealed that the test scores have the same unit of measurement for both male and female on two factors, excluding those of number identification that lack measurement invariance. Finally, these results contribute to evidence of validity for EGMA scores in terms of their internal structure from the perspective of equality of measurement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信