{"title":"具有增益调度控制的单目标优化","authors":"Tainara Marques, G. Reynoso-Meza","doi":"10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a new method for adjusting the gain-scheduling controller, using the $\\nu$-gap metric to reduce the number of gains in the gain-scheduling set and optimizing the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) values through single-objective optimization. For that, an algorithm was created with all the proposed steps, applying to a Peltier cell and comparing the results with two controllers: gain scheduling adjusted by a classical technique and PI controller adjusted with multiobjective optimization presented in [1]. With the reduced set, two new controllers were created: the first one optimizing a controller for each model in the set separately; the second one optimizing a single controller optimizing the whole set. As a result, it is observed that the separately optimized group is able to control almost as well as the gain scheduling adjusted by a classical technique and the PI controller tuning with multiobjective optimization, but both present a great effort in the control action. With a single controller, the response is slower, but the effort of the control action is significantly better.","PeriodicalId":328922,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-objective optimization with gain scheduling control\",\"authors\":\"Tainara Marques, G. Reynoso-Meza\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a new method for adjusting the gain-scheduling controller, using the $\\\\nu$-gap metric to reduce the number of gains in the gain-scheduling set and optimizing the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) values through single-objective optimization. For that, an algorithm was created with all the proposed steps, applying to a Peltier cell and comparing the results with two controllers: gain scheduling adjusted by a classical technique and PI controller adjusted with multiobjective optimization presented in [1]. With the reduced set, two new controllers were created: the first one optimizing a controller for each model in the set separately; the second one optimizing a single controller optimizing the whole set. As a result, it is observed that the separately optimized group is able to control almost as well as the gain scheduling adjusted by a classical technique and the PI controller tuning with multiobjective optimization, but both present a great effort in the control action. With a single controller, the response is slower, but the effort of the control action is significantly better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Single-objective optimization with gain scheduling control
This article presents a new method for adjusting the gain-scheduling controller, using the $\nu$-gap metric to reduce the number of gains in the gain-scheduling set and optimizing the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) values through single-objective optimization. For that, an algorithm was created with all the proposed steps, applying to a Peltier cell and comparing the results with two controllers: gain scheduling adjusted by a classical technique and PI controller adjusted with multiobjective optimization presented in [1]. With the reduced set, two new controllers were created: the first one optimizing a controller for each model in the set separately; the second one optimizing a single controller optimizing the whole set. As a result, it is observed that the separately optimized group is able to control almost as well as the gain scheduling adjusted by a classical technique and the PI controller tuning with multiobjective optimization, but both present a great effort in the control action. With a single controller, the response is slower, but the effort of the control action is significantly better.