{"title":"对马克·格兰诺维特嵌入性概念的批判","authors":"J. Tittenbrun","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1894033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper critically analyses Mark Granovetter's popular concept of embeddedness. It is shown that this notion is based on a simplistic, overly narrow view of social relations and social structures. An alternative view overcoming those weaknesses is put forward.","PeriodicalId":409714,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations (Analysis) (Topic)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Critique of Mark Granovetter's Notion of Embeddedness\",\"authors\":\"J. Tittenbrun\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1894033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper critically analyses Mark Granovetter's popular concept of embeddedness. It is shown that this notion is based on a simplistic, overly narrow view of social relations and social structures. An alternative view overcoming those weaknesses is put forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations (Analysis) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations (Analysis) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1894033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations (Analysis) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1894033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward a Critique of Mark Granovetter's Notion of Embeddedness
The paper critically analyses Mark Granovetter's popular concept of embeddedness. It is shown that this notion is based on a simplistic, overly narrow view of social relations and social structures. An alternative view overcoming those weaknesses is put forward.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
